Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jerry Sandusky's Wife Tries To Run A Reporter Over

Whats the Soup du jour?

Keith Rivers better get used to saying that phrase because he will be eating his meals through a straw for a while.  I am a Bengals fan through and through, but I couldn't believe how many people went off the hook about the Hines Ward hit.  Everyone was saying it was dirty and unnecessary.  I want to set the record straight.  1.  It was a clean hit.  The head was in front.  It didn't draw a flag.  2.  It was necessary.  If you watch the replay Rivers was going in for the tackle.  I don't like the Steelers, but you have to like the way they play.  Physical to the whistle.  Disagree if you must.  Here is the link to highlight of the hit. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mXxc9OxIJyc

This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Cincy Jungle's writers or editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of Cincy Jungle's writers or editors.

Comment 2 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

RE:

I’m not saying it was dirty. I made that point in the comments during the game thread — just wanted to see what others thought late last night. However, we’re 0-7, had our first round draft pick injured for the season, spanked 38-10 by the Steelers. All in one day. So I’m not going to blame fans for being ticked about it.

Blogger at CincyJungle.com -- SB Nation Cincinnati Bengals blog.

by Josh Kirkendall on Oct 20, 2008 4:42 PM EDT reply actions  

It's still a double standard

We all love hard hits that decleat a football player and we all hate injuries. To this end, the NFL has created rules to maintain the integrity and excitement of the game while protecting player health, specifically in cases where a player is in a defenseless position. I think Ward’s hit was in a grey area that the NFL should consider regulating. Had Ward simply used his shoulder, he could have knocked Rivers down just as hard and had the same effect on the outcome of the play. Instead, Ward lowered his head and hit Rivers in the jaw. I don’t think Ward tried to hurt anybody, but he made a choice that seriously increased the possibility of hurting somebody. This is the same issue as spearing on defense, legwhipping on the O-line, the George-Foster rule, and the Warren Sapp rule, the Carson Palmer rule, et al. – football is violence with rules. Ward’s conduct is close to diving into someone’s knee. What is the difference between Ward’s hit on Rivers and the hit on Anquan Boldin? Both were hard, both were with the helmet, both seriously affected the health of the recipient. What is Ward’s jaw was broken in the same manner? Don’t tell me that he would call the hit clean.

"Ryan, Things in here don't react too well to bullets." - Marko Ramius

by TarZander on Oct 20, 2008 8:12 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Cincinnati Bengals.

Editor-In Chief

Cj_small Josh Kirkendall

5255_133614603784_666578784_2414703_1976100_n_small Jason Garrison

Editor/Managing Editor

Rudiblanket_small Anthony Cosenza

Authors

Photo_3_small BeerRun

010511170110_small Joe Goodberry

40297_422933299865_509514865_4658259_6466915_n_small Ryan Harper

Moderators

Nfl palewook

680764146_0eac16fabd_small 80%OFTHETIMEIMRIGHTEVERYTIME

Koolaid_small UpStateMike

Bengals_stamp_by_jamaal10_small Doc Scratch