Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Dallas Cowboys Projects: Andre Holmes

Another word on overtime in the NFL

I disagree with C. Trent that overtime in the NFL is fair. Sourcing a Time Magazine article, he writes that 44% of the teams that win the overtime coin toss, go out and win the game without allowing the opposition an opportunity to touch the ball. Nearly half of the time the other team doesn't touch the ball, and that's fair? That's the argument against overtime in the NFL; give the other team a shot on offense, that's the only thing being asked. Want to have a regulation format (kickoff, return, punt)? Fine.

Once Team A gets rid of the ball (either through scoring or punting or turnover), then Team B gets a shot. After that, if the score is tied, it's sudden death. Next score wins. Drop that 44% to zero. The clock starts on the very first possession, and still applies like it does now. Luck for actions that are not performed by the players should never be in the equation of who wins. Ever.

I don't believe in suggesting that the NFL should suddenly become college football's format either; rules applied and enforced exactly as they're written. Though I tend to find myself enjoying college overtimes a hell of a lot more than the NFL's version. But why can't there be some effort at refining the existing format? Give the other team a shot. If Team A doesn't score on their first possession, then it doesn't matter; sudden death applies anyway.

Comparing general overtime regulations to the Bengals tie Sunday doesn't make sense either. Ties are so rare, that before Sunday, no one talked about them and a frightening revelation was learned when a high-profile player didn't even realize they existed. One tie since 2002 isn't a problem; it's an aberration between two teams that aren't going to the playoffs anyway. Though I do agree, if the NFL is going to change the format anyway, discover ways to eliminate rules in which allows a tied final score. But to react to this game? Nah. No big deal.

Based on watching Sunday's game, I don't think either team would have scored in a second overtime anyway. Once you play 75 minutes worth of football, something needs to be decided. These players can't play for that long, they are not conditioned to do so, and for the Bengals, they only have three days to rest before Thursday night's game against the Steelers.

Comment 0 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Cincinnati Bengals.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Img_5375_small
Heard the song "Bennie and the Jets" today at work, and it got me thinking.

Recent FanPosts

Small
New look for Cincy Jungle?
Small
2015 NFL Power Rankings
Small
Mike Thomas as the #2?
Small
On paper Andy Dalton will have an easier schedule in 2012
Small
Does an Oakland non wild card playoff victory....
Small
Has anyone heard anything on Andre Smith?
Small
Okay guys it is time I got something off my chest
Small
Any News of other draft pick signings??
Ajgreen_small
Who Is RB/FB Jourdan Brooks?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Editor-In Chief

Cj_small Josh Kirkendall

Editor/Managing Editor

Rudiblanket_small Anthony Cosenza

5255_133614603784_666578784_2414703_1976100_n_small Jason Garrison

Authors

Photo_3_small BeerRun

010511170110_small Joe Goodberry

40297_422933299865_509514865_4658259_6466915_n_small Ryan Harper

Small Brennen Warner

Sb_nation_small Jack Cassidy

580551_10150822857707018_613867017_11694254_1239726425_n_small Nick_Crago

Img_0783_small Mike Fightmaster

Moderators

Nfl palewook

680764146_0eac16fabd_small 80%OFTHETIMEIMRIGHTEVERYTIME

Tawky_tawny_small UpStateMike

Joeb698_86e260_small joeb69

Bengals_stamp_by_jamaal10_small Doc Scratch