Cincy Jungle: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:





Someone wrote that the Steelers are like the Bengals... seriously

The problem with a stigma is that they don't go away. Often, these days, the Bengals are still the poster children for for an incredible stretch of misconduct -- in 2006. The last Bengals player arrested was Quincy Wilson on June 18, 2007, charged with disorderly conduct for refusing to disperse among a large crowd. Before that, Johnathan Joseph was arrested for possession of marijuana on January 22, 2007. In between Henry failed to use his turn signal. Levi Jones was jumped by Joey Porter and his posse -- who never received a suspension, by the way. The remaining arrests, against Bengals players, occurred before 2007.

To say it's been a long time, in comparison to the conduct of other team's players, becomes a mild understatement.

I took Mark Madden's piece comparing the Steelers and Bengals for their respective conduct issues. The context of the title "Steelers no different than Bengals" jacks an assortment of extreme debates. Many of which resemble the Bengals as the typical conduct benchmark. Madden makes the point, which is partly my own assumption, that there's little noise from the league, media or even the fans regarding Steelers players getting arrested.

I have a theory. Fans and media expect it. It's even defining NFL Chancellor Roger Goodell's legacy. You might get a blurb on the headlines of ESPN.com's home page, but that's the brightest the spotlight shines. NFL player arrested? What's new? Sad.

So the NFL beat rolls on.

In other topics, Chad is confirming what we already knew; he went apeshit during half time of the 2005 Wild Card game and that he had to be restrained. Actually, do we really care what Chad says or doesn't say anymore? Should we boycott all Chad Johnson related items outside of actual football?

0 recs | Comment 5 comments

Story-email Email | Print |

Comments

Display:

Steelers
In addition to the incidents cited by Madden, the Steelers have had multiple other legal issues, notably Clark Haggans DUI at 3 times the legal limit.  The incident started as road rage, and the police arrested Haggans as he was chasing another motorist on foot.  I think that tops any of Henry's exploits.  
The moral high ground, that it is perceived that the Steelers stand on, is nonsense.

by Smigelskas on Mar 18, 2008 6:33 PM EDT   0 recs

Amen
I've been saying this for a while.  To be honest, however, it's more sad than vindicating.  I wish that the entire NFL - to include the Bengals - would clean up their act.  It just pissed me off that the Bengals were portrayed as the poster children when most of their transgressions derived from immaturity rather than malice.  The Bengals never reached the point of instutionalized illegality -- like the Dallas Cowboys of the 1990s.  Why aren't they cited as the nadir?
"Ryan, Things in here don't react too well to bullets." - Marko Ramius

by TarZander on Mar 18, 2008 7:58 PM EDT   0 recs

Last comment on Chad?
Maybe that's wishful thinking. Could someone please explain to me the financial problems of dealing the malcontent wide receiver? I mean, I know about the roster problems at wide receiver it would create but what would trading Chad, say to move up in the draft, cost us financially? Doesn't whoever we trade him to take on the responsibility of fulfilling- or renegotiating- his existing contract? I know that TJ isn't really a #1 receiver, that Henry can't really be counted on- nor can Holt, Chapman, or Maxwell, and that even going Kelly or Hardy in the draft doesn't guarantee results- not to mention that 9 or higher is way too early for either wideout and that 47 is way too late, but I still don't want him around anymore. It's like, no matter how much you may love your cojones, if one of them turns cancerous, you get that bastard gone. Not that Chad is one of my testicles...

by IgnatiusJReilly on Mar 19, 2008 11:49 AM EDT   0 recs

re:
The financial issues is the dead money that would go against OUR cap. Trading Chad means we'd lose, roughly, $8 million against the cap. <a href="http://www.cincyjungle.com/story/2008/2/5/193133/3354">More.</a> The new team would take on his base salary.

Additionally, moving up the draft means we'd be paying more, exponentially more the higher up we go.

by Kirkendall on Mar 21, 2008 12:04 PM EDT   0 recs

This Story is Getting some Traction
Finally the national media is beginning to expose the Pittsburgh Steelers for the hypocrites they are.  Did Mike Brown ever try to justify his players' off-the-field problems to the extent Rooney does in the article?

http://myespn.go.com/blogs/hashmarks/0-5-802/Steelers-against-domestic-abuse--for-non-starters-.html ?lpos=spotlight&lid=tab7pos2

"Ryan, Things in here don't react too well to bullets." - Marko Ramius

by TarZander on Mar 21, 2008 8:07 PM EDT   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Cincinnati Bengals.
Ad-medium-smq

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Fast_plane_bengal_small
Bengals Web Site?
Atari_small
Geather's cousin in New Orleans
Wimbley_small
Cool MMORPG footballgame
Pgf_small
Alexander to the Bengals?
Curtis_isaac_small
One from the invites...
Dsc_0113_small
Keith Rivers
Atari_small
Buzz Bissinger is FIRED up.
Fast_plane_bengal_small
No RB picks vs Defense
Fast_plane_bengal_small
Jason Shirley
Curtis_isaac_small
Jason Shirley- Manchild.

Post New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Ad-banner-faketeams
Site Meter