Should the Bengals Address Running Back in Draft?
CincyJungle made an upgrade. Read this first to get acquired to the site (like obtaining your old usernames).
In Geoff Hobson's latest, he makes the point that the Bengals are very likely going after a running back and (not "or", and) wide receiver in the top-three rounds after the possibly of drafting Leodis McKelvin if Sedrick Ellis is gone. It's safe to say that the Bengals are unlikely to use their first pick for their #3 wide receiver. Not because their picking ninth, rather the strength of the wide receiver class is considered down, by some. Scouts.com ranks Malcolm Kelly as the highest rated wide receiver at 16. And after his "I'm really fast if I run on really fast surface" episode, his stock started slipping. It's realistic that he could drop to the Bengals second pick. Though, I wouldn't be surprised if he's already gone. I'd be surprised if he's around and the Bengals pass on him after Bob Bratkowski checked out the Oklahoma wide receiver during a two-man workout at Oklahoma earlier this month.
So we can assume the following. That the Bengals will draft either Ellis or McKelvin in the first round -- just because those names appear most often. In the second round, if he's available, the Bengals will help their wide receiver spot with Kelly -- or another WR at least. I don't have any inside information on that, just that it seems marked that way.
But running back in the third?
It's honestly not a bad idea, but something has to give. It's a foregone conclusion -- well, it should be -- that Chris Perry would be axed first. He's got talent, but his health is simply not dependable. Nor is Rudi Johnson's return to 03-05 form, nor is the recovery of Kenny Irons after shredding his knee last pre-season. Kenny Watson is really the only "sure thing" returning while DeDe Dorsey has little room for leverage.
So this topic is, if the Bengals draft a running back (anywhere in the first three rounds), should they and who? (other than Chris Johnson).
0 recs |
8 comments
Comments
What if McFadden drops to 9?
Take him? Trade with Dallas?
by BeerRun on Apr 23, 2008 4:31 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
RE:
Taking McFadden would mean major change w/ RB, IMHO. Rudi wouldn’t be a serviceable backup running back—he’s the type that needs that momentum throughout the game to become better. Chris Perry, adios. Kenny Irons, who knows. Play or not play.
I don’t have a problem with the McFadden pick, but they’d likely have to re-haul their RBs.
Blogger at CincyJungle.com
by Kirkendall on Apr 24, 2008 9:28 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
RE:
Which is probably needed anyhow.
Blogger at CincyJungle.com
by Kirkendall on Apr 24, 2008 9:30 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
This is starting to scare me
I really hope that Ellis is available. Basically, if we draft Mckelvin, then a WR, then a RB and then hope to pick up an impact DT later--I dunno-is it safe to call 2008 a rebuilding year? I understand the logic of taking the best player available and if Mckelvin is it-so be it-but at the same time is a cornerback the best use of a first round pick (particularly a #9?) and when you are already strong at that position?
We are more likely to draft a RB in the second/third round if we get Ellis rather than Mckelvin-at least that is what I hope. It would be really hard to pass on Chris Johnson in round 2 with Ellis already in the fold. There are number of decent backs in the 2-3 round range. Kevin Smith and Matt Forte might make nice picks (one of them should be there in round 3). Both are more “Rudi-like”-between the tackles, makes the first guy miss type backs. Jamaal Charles might make a nice pick as well—more of a speedster and he can catch (probably will be there round 2, but not later).
It seems like the WR class is pretty flat-meaning that there are bunch of guys that all have potential, but none that particularly stand out. If we are looking for a #3 receiver, I think we can get a decent one in round 4-5.
I would hate to reach for a receiver because we are flustered by Ocho Cinco.
by goffchile on Apr 24, 2008 7:37 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
RE: 2008
Honestly, I don’t see us doing much better than our typical 8-8. And barring an absolute disappointment, I think the Browns and Steelers may finish with better records. But who knows. Wacky things happen in the NFL all the time. Who would have thunk after 2006 that Chad Johnson would be who he is today.
Blogger at CincyJungle.com
by Kirkendall on Apr 24, 2008 9:01 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
RE: WR
Per the PFT guys, Manningham could drop to the second day.
Blogger at CincyJungle.com
by Kirkendall on Apr 24, 2008 9:08 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re:
I’m content to go with Rudi as the bellcow, at least initially, this year, so long as we bring in someone with some homerun ability to spell him and/or as a change of pace. Of course, if Ghiaciuc(sp?) doesn’t start getting a better push off the ball, there won’t be much point to sending Rudi between the tackles. Y’all know my feelings on Chris Johnson but there are others I’d like to have- besides at #9. Matt Forte, Kevin Smith, Felix Jones, maybe even Steve Slaton for some scat ability.
I’m not sold on McKelvin at 9 either. Sure, he’s potentially a great return man but, honestly, when are enough first round corners enough? What does it do to Hall and Joseph to go first round on their backups. I think there are plenty of nickel corners available later- Godfrey, Scandrick, Tyvon Branch. That said, in the horrible event we don’t get Ellis- who’s decidedly worth trading up for- I’d be more inclined to go Harvey or Rivers than Leodis.
Inre Manningham. He’s not all that fast and he strikes me as a slightly more sophisticated Chris Henry. We ought to avoid him like the plague. Kelly would be wonderful, Dexter Jackson from App. State, Jerome Simpson from Coastal Carolina, Jordy Nelson, Marcus Monk, Manningham’s bookend, Adrian Arrington, even small school speedster, Pierre Garcon from Mt. Union would be good gets. Although do you really want a guy on the team named “Pierre”?
by IgnatiusJReilly on Apr 24, 2008 9:59 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I’d take Pierre Thomas in a heartbeat =)
I could see them taking a RB with the supp. 3rd…. but if they go CB, WR… they have to pick up a DT like Harrison or Bryant with thier 3rd pick.
http://goallineblitz.com/game/signup.pl?ref=2703832
by kirby28 on Apr 25, 2008 7:54 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 


















