Thinking out loud: Will the Bengals cut Jeremi Johnson?
Each of the past two seasons, the Bengals broke training camp with four running backs on roster. Each included Rudi and Jeremi Johnson and Kenny Watson. Neither included Chris Perry. As for the fourth running back: in 2006, it was Quincy Wilson, in 2007, it was Clinton Dawson.
It would seem to us that running backs, provided the team breaks with four, would be easy to project save for unexpected injuries (or in Perry's case, unexpected health). The Bengals have nine running backs signed for 2008 -- three acquired as undrafted college free agents. We can bank on Rudi Johnson, Chris Perry and Kenny Watson. But what about the fourth?
Will the Bengals keep Jeremi Johnson? You're asking, why wouldn't they? While Reggie Kelly has lined up as the team's full back in the past, the Bengals are toying with the idea of lining up Daniel Coats there also. Perhaps as an understudy once Kelly's contract expires with Coats being a practice squad player in the meantime. They've also admitted to incorporating a spread-like offense (actually, just saying it will be more 3-4 WR formations). Those two things alone makes you wonder if they're plans does not include Jeremi Johnson. On the other hand, we're in the belief that Coats really has no shot at making the 53-man roster.
If the Bengals choose to cut Jeremi, then that would open a spot for fan-favorite, DeDe Dorsey. The Bengals would have a fullback in Kelly (thus opening the door for Ben Utecht full time at Tight End) and four running backs (if the past two seasons hold true). Granted, there's no rule that states that team's must have only four running backs -- though it would seem logical to avoid hurting depth at other spots.
I'm merely speculating here. But my surprise cut of 2008, at this juncture, would be Jeremi Johnson to make way for Dorsey. Just a thought...
0 recs |
5
comments
Read Related
Comments
and Perry’s a pretty good receiver. We could have utecht, perry, kelly and two WRs on the field and the D will have no clue how they are going to line up. Could be a TE, FB, and RB… or it could be an empty backfield.
http://goallineblitz.com/game/signup.pl?ref=2703832
by kirby28 on May 22, 2008 7:43 AM EDT 0 recs
good idea
I like Jeremy and he’s been a solid player and teammate but, if you’ve got tights that arguably block as well or better and are obviously better receivers, then it would make sense. I doubt Johnson would have trouble getting picked up if we cut him. Would he be worth anything in trade?
I’m not sold on Dorsey. Yeah, he was exciting last year at times but, compared to the way Rudi was running, I would have looked speedy coming out of that backfield. Okay, I don’t look speedy anywhere. Perhaps we could use Jeremy Johnson’s spot for another position altogether, like WR or maybe one of those tweener DE/LBs.
by IgnatiusJReilly on May 22, 2008 11:10 AM EDT 0 recs
but
How many teams flat out just don’t have a fullback on their roster?
I doubt Coats is making the team with the addition of Utecht and Sherry.
by mp45242 on May 22, 2008 11:58 AM EDT 0 recs
To be honest....
It would seem to me that Sherry would be more PS material during his rookie season. I would suspect, however, that Coats, unless he blows minds, that he might not even make the team. The last effort to find a spot for him relies on the theory that the Bengals acquire tight ends as blockers.
So if Coats is dropped, then the Bengals TE would look like Kelly (mostly FB), Utecht and Sherry. If Coats DOES make the team and Dorsey doesn’t, then that would invite Sherry to the roster.
Blogger at CincyJungle.com
by Kirkendall on
May 22, 2008 8:11 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Coats
I’d say Coats over Sherry and I’m not sure where- if anywhere- Nate Lawrie fits. Alternatively, Jason Shirley would look awfully imposing lined up in the backfield.
by IgnatiusJReilly on May 22, 2008 3:49 PM EDT 0 recs






