Defensive Kool-Aid
First thing...
I want to note that I think this forum is a great place to talk Bengals football. For the most part, everyone who participates seems to have a solid understanding of the Bengals and the game and many of the regular guys who post messages have interesting opinions that I appreciate reading and hearing.
To my "Kool-Aid" point though...a few of us have discussed "Drinking the Kool-Aid" as it pertains to the defense with the addition of Zimmer, Rivers, and the "potential" (I'm tired of that word) of the young secondary and D-Tackles.
...well I was at practice on Friday and "potential" or not, that defense looks AWFUL. ...they don't "look like they have potential." They look "Awful right now." "Potential" doesn't mean anything. And it doesn't win football games.
Guys like Fanene, Darryl Blackstock (who?), Jeanty, Frostee Rucker, Brandon Johnson, Dhani Jones...these are all guys being counted on to start or play key roles on the defense. (Uugggghhh)
If that doesn't make you scared, I don't know what will. No offense, I'm sure these guys are all noble journeymen and good characters -- but these guys are all scabs. Really. I've been reading everyone's comments about how excited they are about the defense...and I have to admit, I have been a little excited too...but after seeing that collection on defense yesterday?
I don't know about the rest of you, but I don't know how to get excited about fielding a team full of retreads and stop-gaps. That defense looks like it was pieced together by Rachel Phelps and is being managed by Lou Brown. Hey, hopefully the Bengals will have the same outcome as that fictional Indians team did.
So anyways, I don't want to hear about Zimmer's job he did in Dallas with a bunch of no-names. Anyone like to remember the playmakers he had too? The Bengals D has ZERO playmakers.
So who are the Bengals leaders and potential playmakers or gamebreakers on defense? John Thornton (He might be on the 40 Under 40 list but has this dude made a play in 5 years?), Dexter Jackson (aka: "Larry Brown The 2nd"), and Dhani Jones. (Solid player back in '03, I'll give him that) Those are the 3 guys us fans are counting on to lead the Bengals defense at their 3 respective positions?? Again, not to sound like a jerk, but if that gets you excited, the Kool-Aid you're drinking must be high octane. These guys couldn't even start on most NFL teams.
I know the preseason is the one time where every fan can feel great about the upcoming season...but man, not only do I not see it...but the thought of that crew trying to line up against the NFC East and the AFC South makes me squirm.
So...while the offense looks stout and it's exciting to drink the Kool-Aid and think about the "Potential" of such players like Rivers, Marvin White, Ndukwe, Geathers, and Peko, lets talk about who's actually done something in this league and who has the "Ability" to do it NOW (Team slogan?) as opposed to who "might be good in 2-3 years."
I know I sound like an eternal pessimist but lets talk about reality and not what our fantasies are.
Thoughts??
0 recs |
17 comments
Comments
Good post John
I hate to say it, but I think you make good points. From my own perspective, I’m high on this defense because of the “potential” word and because of the things we’ve heard from Mike Zimmer. But potential doesn’t win games, that’s for damn sure.
You’re right, whose this team’s defensive leader? Whose this team’s defensive playmakers?
I admit, I’m drinking the Kool-Aid right now - and I’m sucker enough to do it every season. Not just because I’m a Bengals fan though, but because the training camp period is always a place we get sucked into believing some things will improve - which in reality, this team hasn’t done since 2005.
Again, good post man. I upgraded it to the front page.
Blogger at CincyJungle.com
by Kirkendall on Aug 9, 2008 1:09 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Kool-Aid
i can’t really say i don’t understand why you would say that about the state of the bengals defensive, tho i would have to disagree on a few points. as far as no play-makers i would say that geathers, joseph, odom, and jackson have proven themselves as playmakers, and hall, rivers, ndukwe and white have at least entered the ring.
tho everyone says you’re not allowed to say it, the fact is the defense’s number one problem over the last few years has been injury, and not just randomed starters injured here and there, but position groups being wiped out year after year. go back to the safeties three years ago when we had herring and williams out, after losing our 2nd string SS we were starting arizona’s third string SS ohalate (if i spelled it wrong it’s cause i’m not gonna bother to look it up). then it was the O line, then the LB’s….we all remember.
tho reading what i wrote it occurred to me that there is an equal biggest problem, our team is designed for the offensive to be able to move the ball, and control the clock. you don’t have to look much further than last year’s run of one third-down coversion in eighteen attempts to see from where the defensive issues stem.
....first post and it was a long one….sorry….i really enjoy your site tho!!
by bigfatstella on Aug 9, 2008 7:59 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Relativity
IF we can run the ball again this year, then the defense doesn’t have to be full of playmakers and be Top 5, in order for the Bengals to be successful, it just has to be a step better than it was in the past.
CB: Joseph and Hall have another year under their belt, and Deltha as the nickel isn’t bad, and is much better than having Tory (Skeletor) James out there.
S: Possibly a step back losing Madieu, but he didn’t play any better than Marvin White last year. Jackson, White, and Ndukwe isn’t a bad rotation
LB: Rivers is a stronger, faster version Landon, and while Dhani and Jeanty are ‘stop-gap’ type players, they are better line backers than Geathers, and Corey Mays, picked up off the street.
D-Line: Thornton needs to be upgraded, but I believe Odom, overall, will be comparable to J. Smith with a better pass rush, and weaker run support, which is a trade off I’m willing to take. If Geathers can actually stay at End, he and Odom will create more pressure than we seen in years. Also,It doesn’t take years to learn how to play DT, so I think Sims or Shirley will be an upgrade as 3rd and 4th tackles.
I think that each unit is better than last year, and while non of them are great if a whole unit doesn’t get decimated, as BFS pointed out, the D will be good enough.
by R.F. Mehl on Aug 10, 2008 2:06 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
From One
That’s an impressive analysis from viewing just one practice. Hope you’re wrong. We won’t know anything about the D until after Game 2 or 3, or maybe even Game 4, Cleveland.
by Timzilla on Aug 10, 2008 6:33 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
More Kool-Aid...
OK, I’m really NOT trying to sound like an angry Bengals fan…but in all honestly, lets call a spade a spade. Yes, I am pessimistic because every year I think things are going to change, and of course they never do. That’s why I come across the way I do. Addressing a few of the comments…
BFS:
So you think this defensive unit is full of playmakers? You serious?? Jonathan Joseph a playmaker? I’d have to blatantly say, not so much. I DO like Joseph and here we all go again, I think Joseph has “Great Potential.” But, crimany, aren’t we all getting tired of talking about how great our players might one day be?!?
I don’t think I need to sit here and reiterate how many interceptions J-Jo should have in career by now, do I? Anyone remember, oh I don’t know…12 BLATANT drops that he’s had??
Playmakers don’t drop interceptions, BFS.
And Odom? Ahhhh, I don’t know. Maybe. (Aka, he’s got “potential”)
Dexter Jackson? C’mon. Like I said, homeboy should change his name to Larry Brown.
But yes, you’re right. Injuries HAVE played a huge part to that defense’s demise in ‘07. But you want to tell me how the Bengals are different in that regard to EVERY other team in the NFL?!? Injuries are a part of the game. Team’s only have 53 man rosters. Every team faces it. Injuries are not an excuse.
RFM:
I agree with you. This defense doesn’t have to be a top 5 unit in order for the Bengals to be successful. But clearly they can’t be a bottom 3 unit either. The offense can’t go out every week, every series, every quarter, etc and pitch a perfect game.
And I also agree that even with my pessimism, the secondary is clearly better than the secondary that sported Afani Ohalete. (However the heck you spell his name) Speaking of the spelling though… Who cares if any of us misspell his name! That dude sucked so bad he doesn’t deserve for anyone to spell his name correctly! He’s lucky he gets mentioned for crying out loud.
Anyways, my point is that being better than that doesn’t say much.
Any for everyone that thinks we can anoint Keith Rivers a star and a playmaker, does anyone remember the rookie year David Pollack had? When you miss half of camp like Rivers did, lets not pretend the kid is going to magically be inserted into the lineup in September and everything will be just peachy. All Keith Rivers is TODAY is a player who has “Potential.” The guy hasn’t played one down in the NFL and you’re trying to tell me he’s a playmaker?? Don’t you have to first make plays to be a playmaker? Yeah, he’s a 1st round pick out of a big time college. You know what?? So was Javon Langford.
And TimZilla…I do like reading your comments. Really. But it’s obvious you and I just differ in our thoughts…
...but my “analysis” wasn’t based off of seeing one practice. It was based off of 25 years of frustration. Moreover, it doesn’t take an expert to see that the group of misfits that team has masquerading as an NFL defense is pretty sad.
by JohnCockToastin on Aug 10, 2008 1:16 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
injuries
injuries don’t matter? alright, but when pitt lost three starters (only 3) they went 1 and 3 to finish the season….they lose 43 and they’re a different team.
as to how the bengals injuries have been different from every one elses, i thought i made that point, but here it is again. no team in the nfl can have an entire postion group decimated and expect to win. if you lose 5 starters that’s bad. when they are all safeties it’s devastating. when u loose 14 lb’s in a season your def is gonna struggle. when the millions you spent on your O line are injured on the bench you are gonna become one dimensional and easy to defend, one run to nowhere and two passes, another three and out. Get back out there and win D!
sure every 20 years somebody finds a tom brady, but if you really could replace a 1-6 mill a year starter with a $250, 000 back up, then why in the world would anyone ever make anything beyond league minimum?
i would love to see the breakdown of injuries the bengals have had since the browns game in 06….btw…..that’s when they started losing after their rise in 05. that game it was dexter jackson, tab perry, pollack and a fourth i can’t remember…want to say it was the game we lost rich braham. dexter was the only to return that year….or any year…...tab was certainly never the same.
but the real point again is not just the amount of injuries to starters but how we have almost freakishly been hit over and over in the same position group. safeties that year, LB’s this year. O line every year….i wasn’t gonna mention rb’s but….rudi, perry, irons…1,2, and 3 on the roster…..remember the game we ran outta centers? how bout the kicker we signed to cover for graham for a game and he took a season ending injury on his only play and they had to pay him for the whole year? LOL!!!
i understand why you can’t just say “hey, we lost a key guy so now we can’t win”. but if you really think injuries don’t play a part in wins and loses, well, the bitterness has clouded your judgement. what bitterness? not really sure how the bengals def 25 years ago has anything to do with the practice you watched….goin out on a limb, but i’m gonna say most of 1983’s roster has retired.
now all that said, do i want to see better play on that side? absolutely. was there a problem with the scheme in my opinion? maybe, but again the offense failed to score 21 points in 5 of the 9 losses last year and two of the wins. they scored only 21 in three more games, 1 win and 2 losses. have i seen bad plays? of course, i’ve seen plays that made me wanna rip the tv off the wall…but remember that every team gets scored on pretty much every week. why? cause somebody on D got beat. the fact is the bengals are where every team that competes is, looking to improve depth and hoping to stay healthy.
i remember the D playing very well in several games towards the last third of the season…..and i remember plays being made….geathers is really not a play maker? and all those dropped int’s joseph had his rookie year i believe go in the stat books as passes defended, not passes dropped. dexter has a superbowl mvp and ring that speaks way louder than you will ever type.
we have what is supposed to be one of the most potent offenses in the nfl, and it ’s coming into camp healthier than it’s been in 3 years…...they damm well better make that D look bad at practice.
as bengals fans we’ve lost so long and have seen so many bad teams wear the stripes that it starts to feel like everyone else is on top…we were just on the bottom….now we have a top 12 team, at least top 16 because of carson and the o line alone. as far as “potential” we have a team that could be elite. the bengals is now a team that was put together very well from players to coaches, but face it…it’s designed to be an offesive power….so when that isn’t working the concept won’t work and who will end up looking bad? the defense. i understand your frustration but i’m tired of hearing people beat on the defense for what really amounts to the offense not doing what they were paid the big money to do. just like every other GOOD football team in the nfl, you have to have your best players playing at their highest level, you have to get a few balls to bounce your way (every steelers playoff game in 05), AND YOU HAVE TO STAY HEALTHY!!
now seriously…...can i borrow your towel? my car hit a water buffalo.
by bigfatstella on Aug 10, 2008 3:58 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I take it back, I take it alllll back
I guess I was guilty of buying into the talk, new coach, new attitude, new guys, but the result last night, especially when it was #1’s vs #1’s was atrocious. Minimal pressure on the QB, weak against the run, horrible tackling, this D has a LOT of work to do in the next 3 weeks or it’s going to look like most every other D we’ve run out there the last 10 seasons.
And the #1 Offense wasn’t anything to write home about either. I know you aren’t supposed to take too much from a pre-season game, but man that was disappointing all the way around.
by Galaxy CDS on Aug 12, 2008 10:06 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Don't take anything from it
Not only did many players sit the game, but I don’t think the Bengals did much game-planning, kept it simple to get an idea where they are at with fundamentals and with new players. Piss poor tackling was my biggest concern, but the game was just meaningless and I picked up plenty of positives.
Blogger at CincyJungle.com
by Kirkendall on Aug 12, 2008 10:55 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nothing else matters
Pre-season or not, game-planning or no, if these guys can’t still can’t tackle nothing else matters. You can run the best designed scheme in the league, and your guys can “play fast”, but if they can’t put the guy on the ground when they get there it’s all for nothing.
by Galaxy CDS on Aug 12, 2008 11:18 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Still...
They have just under four weeks to fix it.
Blogger at CincyJungle.com
by Kirkendall on Aug 12, 2008 12:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Here's hopin'
I want to believe…but last night was a little bit of a faith shaker. We’ll see. Injury risk be damned, if I was coaching them those boys they’d be in pads tackling each other til they figured it out.
by Galaxy CDS on Aug 12, 2008 12:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Just remember
I like the kool-aid… :)
Blogger at CincyJungle.com
by Kirkendall on Aug 12, 2008 2:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Standing firm on my original thought
Understandably, the preseason is just that and we all know it. I think we all know we can’t get too excited over good, bad, or indifferent play. However, weren’t we all looking for a spark, someone to make some plays and step up? Something??
Geathers made a nice play…and actually so did my man “Larry Brown.” But Marvin White’s 4 missed tackles (all that went for 1st downs and a 30 yard TD) left me just shaking my head.
Him getting TRUCKED by Donald Driver was the most embarrassing. Hey dude, those long things attatched to your shoulders…with hands at the end of them?? ...yeah, those are arms. Use them.
I thought Rivers looked the part. The other linebackers in my opinion kept getting caught up in the wash on almost every play—which isn’t good. (Johnson made a nice play that I saw though).
I thought all of the DB’s looked flat out attrocious. That first series should have been a completion on 3rd and 19. There was actually a few key drops that Green Bay receivers made that bailed our group out on 3rd downs.
Rod Jones…I mean, David Jones can go ahead and become our new “Toast” it seems. (Maybe a bit harsh…but I think it’s kinda funny. Was I the only one that saw a Bengals Corner named Jones being burnt and NOT think “Toast“)
Those guys made Arron Rodgers look like a stud.
by JohnCockToastin on Aug 12, 2008 11:31 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
David Jones
I wondered about him last year when the Saints let him go to keep Jason David, whom we all watched get flat taken to school by Manning and Wayne in the season opener. Heard so much good word about him this spring and summer and he comes out looking like that?
Simeon Castille FTW.
by A Pragmatic Bengals Fan on Aug 13, 2008 1:17 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Brent
OK…
1st…you’re either in high school or college cause there’s no WAY you have a job. If you do have a job, I’m sure you’re bound to lose it. Take a knee.
2nd…If you think Corey Lynch is a “Playmaker” cause he blocked a field goal for App. St., why don’t you go back to watching college football.
3rd…If you think Marvin White is playmaker, you must not have tuned in Monday Night. He made lots of plays alright. Just real bad ones, unfortunately for us.
4th…I take back my original thoughts (sorry Kirkendall), Apparently not everyone on this forum has something good/relevant to say.
5th…I apologize for sounding pessimistic and realize I come across that way. I understand this is a place for Bengals fans to talk positively and enjoy each others feedback…so apparently I’m out of line and fans who have honest and realistic opinions shouldn’t bother contributing. Brent, you did a marvelous job in making me realize that. Good for you. I think I should go away and leave “blogging” to intelligent idiots and homers who refuse to see both sides of the coin. WTF was I thinking?? Thanks for telling me to lick your nuts too. You’re a real class act. I’d like to shake your hand. I wish I could.
by JohnCockToastin on Aug 15, 2008 5:42 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Brent doesn't speak for the rest of us,
Nor is it likely he has any nuts to be licked(see below).
Just a few thoughts on the D:
Secondary: Can be nothing but better with Leon, JonJo, Chinedum, and Marvin all having last year under their belts. No, Marvin’s tackling Monday didn’t get it done but he knows that and I fully expect him to make the corrections- to include, say, wrapping up. With Deltha and Dexter as backups/veteran mentors and the additions of Corey Lynch- who is, just from watching him at camp and in limited teams and defense Monday, a baller- and possibly Simeon Castille, I have to admit I’m a bit optimistic about this group.
Linebackers: While my fantasy lineup would have included Odell in the middle instead of Dhani Jones, after the M*A*S*H rerun that was last year, this group will be vastly improved. That would be so if the only addition was Keith Rivers and we’ve also got the impressive Brandon Johnson(oddly, I assumed it would be Blackstock out of the two former Cardinals, that was more likely to shine), Blackstock, a healthy and more experienced Jeanty, and a healthy for the first time, Eric Henderson. Dhani actually knows the defense going into this season- unlike last year’s trial by fire, and arguably our most talented backer, Brooks, is fighting to even make the squad. And, for god’s sakes, don’t forget Bjork!
D-Line: Admittedly, the obvious improvement of the two previous groups may mean little if we don’t get some better play out of this group. Geathers being back at his natural position is one improvement. Odom, even injured, is a serious step up from Justin Smith. I think Domato Peko is a good tackle in need of a larger than Thornton running mate on the inside. Enter Sims and Shirley. I feel good about Shirley being taken under Thornton’s wing and John’s acceptance that he may very well be mentoring the guy who eventually takes his job. I’ve never doubted Sims and the two giants should prove a modest upgrade at the very least. Also, this group will benefit from Zimmer’s plan to use the oversized but swift Henderson and Brooks as rush specialists as well as his aggressive scheme sending different players, from different parts of the line on blitzes.
No, this isn’t the Lewis/Suggs/Gregg/Ngata/Thomas/Reed Raven defense of several years ago but I think this D could potentially hold it’s own. Assuming we straighten out the rushing problem on offense, a mid-ranked defense is all we really need to win. I think there’s a better than good chance of that happening.

Um, Brent?
by IgnatiusJReilly on Aug 15, 2008 6:45 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Right!
I’m not trying to act like a “prophet” nor do I want to say I told you so…
But it looks…REAL bad.
by JohnCockToastin on Aug 18, 2008 9:54 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 



















