Long way to go before Palmer could be argued as the greatest Bengals quarterback
Is Carson Palmer the best quarterback in team history? The question was posed by Study of Sports, introducing with, "Many would argue that Carson Palmer is the best quarterback that the Bengals have had in their franchises history." In truth, we're not really aware of many that think so, leaving the debate between Ken Anderson and Boomer Esiason. Both have Super Bowl appearances. Both have winning records as the Bengals starting quarterback (Anderson is 91-81, Esiason is 62-61).
While Carson Palmer is 32-29, he has no Super Bowl appearances and his lone playoff ended after the second play of the Wild Card game against Pittsburgh. Not that it is his fault; it's not. Still, Paul Brown, the revered father of the Cincinnati Bengals franchise, once said that "the test of a quarterback is where his team finishes." He said that in reflection of Otto Graham, calling him the best of all time. However, that quote has just as much truthful meaning today as ever.
Palmer, on the other hand, is on pace to break several all-time records, provided he stays healthy.
| Palmer | Anderson | Boomer | |
| Seasons | 6 | 16 | 10 |
| Games | 65 | 192 | 134 |
| Attempts | 2,165 | 4,475 | 3,564 |
| Completions | 1,380 | 2,654 | 2,015 |
| Comp % | 63.7% | 59.3% | 56.5% |
| Yards | 15,630 | 32,838 | 27,149 |
| TDs | 107 | 197 | 187 |
| INTs | 67 | 160 | 131 |
We'll pretend Palmer's first season didn't happen -- he sat behind Jon Kitna. Even so, Palmer is on pace to surpass Esiason with the complicated mathematical formula of multiplying Palmer's stats, by two. In that respect, Palmer is on pace for 214 touchdowns and 31,260 yards passing. If that pace holds true, then Palmer, if he plays another 10 seasons, will shatter Anderson's numbers.
In the end, stats have very little meaning in the grand scheme of things. Palmer must stock pile wins now, or else he won't surpass either Boomer or Anderson. We're not saying that Palmer is not going to be the greatest quarterback in franchise history. Neither did that initial piece reference at the opening. However, he still has a ways to go before surpassing Kenny Anderson and Boomer Esiason.
0 recs |
3 comments
|
Comments
I voted for Kenny
Although his per season numbers aren’t as impressive as Boomer’s, he played most of his career in the defense dominated 70s where 3000 yard passers were a rarity. The Bengals also had some damn good teams in the seventies, just overshadowed by the Steelers.
There is one thing that would put Palmer in the running… and we know what that is.
by goffchile on Jan 21, 2009 1:05 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I must protest
that neither Turk Schonert nor Jack “The Throwin’ Samoan” Thompson.
by IgnatiusJReilly on Jan 21, 2009 10:06 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Hey, he didn't say the WORST Bengals QB!
…LOL…although neither of those guys qualify, of course. And Turk did actually help Ken Anderson get a job when he needed one a couple of Senior Bowls ago, right?
But really…who would we consider to be the WORST overall Bengals QB? Akili Smith? David Klingler? Jay Schroeder or Scott Mitchell? Not just looking at numbers here…we’re talking about overall negative impact on the team.
by TheWalrus1971 on Jan 22, 2009 9:48 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs

by 

















