The number "23" is just a number
![]() |
Walter Sparrow is haunted by "The Number 23". |
It's often easy to lose things in stats. For instance, you know that Ryan Fitzpatrick had eight touchdowns this season. But can you tell me which team his fifth touchdown was against? Considering how low that number is, you just might. Bad example. We love Crazy Legs. It wasn't as if he single-handedly lost us football games. No. That was Corey Webster. We don't forget.
Stats as a whole can picture the performance of a single player. Not the team. The team is the accumulation of stats with all players. It's the team stats that matter; the third down conversions, the yards-per-rush with all running backs, time of possession, etc. And, um, the score. Don't forget that; kind of important. There's another stat, specifically marked "To Cincinnati", with the only coherent response being "holy crap, how many?"
Throughout the season the Bengals lost 23 players to IR; several of whom left with an injury settlement. Carson Palmer went down early in the season, didn't play again. Stacy Andrews went down late in the season. Neither are included as the "23". Fingerling freaks. Andrew Whitworth, Scott Kooistra and Dan Santucci are three linemen that project on next year's roster (because they have signed contracts through next year). Marvin White, Johnathan Joseph, Keith Rivers, Robert Geathers and Dexter Jackson weren't just defensive players that went down, they were starters (yes, Jackson started three games). Along with several others, these players will be back next season.
If that's too detailed, the generic crack-the-stat version looks like this: starting left guard, primary backup at tackle and guard, backup center, starting defensive end, two starting safeties, a starting cornerback, and a starting linebacker.
It's granted, understood and accepted that injuries happen with all teams. Better teams have better talent lower in their depth charts creating a scenario where a backup player becomes a starter because he performed better while playing for the injured starter. We're also not telling you that you should expect an undefeated season, or even a playoff berth. However, when you have that many people go down, most of whom are returning in 2009, the team has to get better. Right?
So it's easy to say 23 players on injured reserve. After all, 23 is just a number, high enough that the context within the number begins to fade. The best part about the off-season and training camp, is that that number should default back to zero. Of course, like seasons before, we'll start watching a new crop of injured players suffer hamstring injuries during training camp that could miss the start of the season. But that's later.
Comments
Any adept of the Bavarian Illuminati
will tell you that the significance of “23” is merely a subheading under the “Law of 5’s”.
“23” = “2” and “3” and “2” + “3” = “5”.
“5”, as in the formation of the square, the Golden MeanArm’s “9”, which is to say “3” to the “2nd” power or, again, “3” + “2”.
Or, the dreaded public displays of “Ocho”(“Dos” to the Power of “Tres”, lest we forget), “Cinco”, which not only translates to “5” but has “5” letters.
And then there is the little matter of Mike “B-R-O-W-N”…
by IgnatiusJReilly on
Jan 7, 2009 11:01 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Um, yeah...wow...
…that’s just what I was thinking, yeah… ;-)
by TheWalrus1971 on
Jan 7, 2009 12:19 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
23
As long as the name Perry, isn’t written over 23 next year, I will be happy. We have wasted enough money on him.
If we cut Perry, Levi and Dexter, there should be enough money to go get a good O-lineman
by R.F. Mehl on
Jan 7, 2009 4:45 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
To that list of cuts
I’d like to 86 half our free agent crop from last year- to wit, Mssrs. Utecht and Odom. They’re like when you light that superspectacular firework to end the 4th festivities and you turn away, stick your fingers in your ears, and….the wick burns mrrily down to the device and just sputters out. A-HA!
by IgnatiusJReilly on
Jan 7, 2009 9:12 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs













