Rankings and Picks for Week Six
I'm not one that often does NFL-specific subjects, outside of our 4-1 Cincinnati Bengals. Oh, that sounds good. Our, 4-1 Cincinnati Bengals. Each week we're asked to provide our own Power Picks to SB Nation. Then they combine all of the bloggers rankings and sort them out in some complicated formula (like adding them and dividing them) to come out with the ranking. Take note, I ranked the Bengals, last week, eighth overall. However, when complicated formula was applied to the other 31 bloggers rankings, we were listed as 14th in the SB Nation Power Rankings for Week 5. I'm sure a win over the Ravens will help us somewhat.
Below the jump I list the rankings I gave, as well as my winners for the week -- would have liked to wait a while, but someone mentioned something called a deadline. And Wiki says that a deadline is "narrow field of time that some sort of objective or task must be accomplished by." Bloggers. Deadlines. What has this world come to?
Here's the objective. The following is my rankings. You can debate (friendly, of course) my rankings and selections or make your own.
| 1 | Indianapolis Colts | 17 | Miami Dolphins |
| 2 | Minnesota Vikings | 18 | Houston Texans |
| 3 | New York Giants | 19 | Green Bay Packers |
| 4 | New Orleans Saints | 20 | Jacksonville Jaguars |
| 5 | Denver Broncos | 21 | San Diego Chargers |
| 6 | Cincinnati Bengals | 22 | Seattle Seahawks |
| 7 | Philadelphia Eagles | 23 | Washington Redskins |
| 8 | Chicago Bears | 24 | Tennessee Titans |
| 9 | Atlanta Falcons | 25 | Carolina Panthers |
| 10 | Baltimore Ravens | 26 | Tampa Bay Buccaneers |
| 11 | New York Jets | 27 | Detroit Lions |
| 12 | San Francisco 49ers | 28 | Cleveland Browns |
| 13 | New England Patriots | 29 | Buffalo Bills |
| 14 | Pittsburgh Steelers | 30 | Kansas City Chiefs |
| 15 | Dallas Cowboys | 31 | Oakland Raiders |
| 16 | Arizona Cardinals | 32 | St. Louis Rams |
| Game | Winner |
| Houston @ Cincinnati | Cincinnati (d'uh) |
| Detroit @ Green Bay | Green Bay |
| St. Louis @ Jacksonville | Jacksonville |
| Baltimore @ Minnesota | Minnesota |
| NY Giants @ New Orleans | New York Giants |
| Cleveland @ Pittsburgh | Pittsburgh |
| Carolina @ Tampa Bay | Tampa Bay |
| Kansas City @ Washington | Kansas City |
| Philadelphia @ Oakland | Philadelphia |
| Arizona @ Seattle | Seattle |
| Tennessee @ New England | New England |
| Buffalo @ NY Jets | New York Jets |
| Chicago @ Atlanta | Atlanta |
| Denver @ San Diego | San Diego |
0 recs |
12 comments
|
Comments
Not sure if we're better than the Eagles
But whatever, close enough
by jsl413 on Oct 14, 2009 12:31 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
They re-signed trotter
If that gives you any indication of their d. They lost dawkins and Jim Johnson died. You don’t replace that leadership.
by brandone on Oct 14, 2009 1:14 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
personally
I think it would be humorous if the Bengals and Eagles were tied in the power rankings.
by Cedric Benson Boat Party on Oct 14, 2009 12:58 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
everyone but McNabb would understand
:)
by El_Danimal on Oct 14, 2009 1:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not to shabby...
I think you have Dallas a little high. Also, didn’t the Raiders beat the Chiefs earlier this season?
by Peko94 on Oct 14, 2009 1:04 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
RE:
That’s one of the things with these power rankings. Do you primarily factor in face to face match ups? That’s kind of the way I think it should be too. But then you get these scenarios like the Big 12, when Texas, Texas Tech and Oklahoma beat each other up. Who would you rank ahead of who? IMHO, as of right now, I think the Raiders are much worse than the Chiefs.
Blogger at CincyJungle.com -- SB Nation Cincinnati Bengals blog.
by Kirkendall on Oct 14, 2009 11:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bengals are top 8...
We’re better than the Bears (stouter D, better running game, better QB pressure), and we tied the Eagles last year with our backup QB. But the Falcons haven’t done anything to really warrant being below the Bears, Eagles and Bengals.
6. Falcons
7. Eagles
8. Bengals
9. Bears
The Bears will lose to the Falcons in Atlanta this weekend, and the Bengals are artificially highly-ranked at #6.
And the TEXANS at #18 are close to where they should be. They’re playing like a middle-of-the-pack team, but a resurgence of their run game and a good display by Andre Johnson (#1 receiver in the league), along with QB pressure by their top 2 defensive players, Demeco Ryan and Mario Williams could spell disaster for the Bengals. Old Bengals would have relaxed this week, and been shocked by an amped up visiting opponent (to go along with a not-full stadium putting a damper on the team’s return from a 2-0 away stint against 2 divisional foes). This game has let-down game written all over it. There is plenty REASON FOR CONCERN with this weeks’ game.
by Yaccub Fleishcman on Oct 14, 2009 1:55 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
You make some good points, but....
Whit both their starting RG and LG out for the season from an Oline that is only average with them I think they have more to worry about than we do. Yea Williams and Ryan are pretty good but we have faced better this year. Their running game is pedestrian and they have only one WR who is good, very good actually, but we have taken #1 WRs out of games so far and made teams try to beat us with secondary players. If we let down they can beat us but if we can continue to play like we have we should win. We do have to stop playing down to the level of lesser opponents. No more games like the Browns game.
" My enemy said "Love your enemy". I obeyed and loved myself." Gibran
by JUNGLEJOHN on Oct 15, 2009 9:21 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 

















