Bengals impress upon the media with rankings; Rich Gannon and overtime; being gutsy in overtime
Peter King ranks the Bengals 15th in his "Fine Fifteen" writing, "I'm not a Bengal buyer." Oh, c'mon Peter. We put on the best games each week. What do you want? Blow out victories? That's not our predatory instincts work. We like to sucker you in before going in for the kill. That's the Bengal tiger way. How do you not buy into this? I guess he makes that apparent when no Bengals makes out his first quarter NFL awards. We'll win every award at the end of the season. That's just how we roll.
Pete Prisco recognizes our predatory instinct, saying the Bengals have "played close in every one of their games, and now get a chance to show they are for real when they go to Baltimore to play the Ravens. Carson Palmer has played big with the game on the line this season." He ranked us 11th while Pro Football Talk jumps us as high as eighth.
The Bengals were one of two teams that won on the road last weekend. The other was the New York Giants.
The Bengals may have shutdown Braylon Edwards and Greg Jennings this year, it's the rookies that are beating up our secondary, writes Joe Reedy.
...or the second straight week a rookie wrecked havoc on the secondary. While Pittsburgh’s Mike Wallace, a third-round pick, did the honors last week, it was Cleveland’s Mohamed Massaquoi who did it this time with 148 yards on eight receptions.
Rich Gannon didn't like it when the Bengals called timeout with seven seconds left in overtime to attempt a 31-yard field goal attempt. He didn't like it because it gave Joshua Cribbs a shot to return a kickoff. In overtime. Sudden Death. Honest mistake.
Clark Judge writes:
Gutsy, gutsy, gutsy. In a season where too many coaches play not to lose, Cincinnati's Marvin Lewis stands out for taking a chance -- and I mean spitting in the face of everything we're told about conventional coaching. Believe me, with fourth-and-11 at the Cleveland 41 and a minute left in OT, there are plenty of guys who would've punted and settled for the tie. Not Marvin. Maybe it's because he tied Philadelphia last season, or maybe it's because he just ran out of patience. All I know is that he and the Bengals are tied for first in the AFC North, with a win next week putting them alone at the top.
Lewis actually was going to punt it, if not for Carson Palmer and Andrew Whitworth. But Lewis saw the football decision most of all (so he claims).
Q: How did you weigh the differences between punting, or going for it on fourth down in overtime?
ML: "I thought either way, we’d get the ball back. The only way we wouldn’t get the ball back would have been if we gave them the ball right there, if we didn’t convert it. I thought if we punted the ball, we’d get an opportunity to get the ball back by pinning them down there. They had no timeouts left, and we had two. If they threw one incompletion, we were guaranteed to get the ball back with a considerable amount of time. Had they not had an incompletion, we would have had the ball with some time left on the clock. Either way, there was an opportunity to get the ball back."
Who Dey Fans are like us. Yes, the Bengals have struggled a lot. Yes, they've look beatable. However, they are 3-1. Nate agrees.
The Cincinnati Bengals are 11th in ESPN's Power Rankings. If ESPN says so, it must be true.
James Walker says that the Bengals special team's stock is dropping. I have to concur. Walker is also surprised the deep pass hasn't returned yet.
The Ravens could be without offensive lineman Jared Gaither this week.
6 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Boy!!!! it's gutsy alright.
I’m also wondering how many 4th downs we went on, and what is the record for the season? We have to be close already.
i have to admit, i had the same momentary lapse of reason that struck rich gannon; for some reason, i guess i just couldn’t wrap my head around the notion that we were almost at the end of overtime instead of regulation.
peter king drives me nuts with his anti-bengals mindset. i realize that sounds paranoid, but he effusively praises elvis dumervil while ignoring antwan odom, and calls darelle revis third in the mvp race while ignoring leon hall. if the steelers were the 3-1 team that’s had nothing but close games including a loss from a fluke play, he’d be praising their ability to win when it matters.
i'm going to go america all over your ass!
I stopped reading Peter King
when he said that Joey Porter shouldn’t be suspended for attacking Levi Jones because it would hurt the Dolphins. I have long thought that Peter King is especially anti-Bengals.
Personally i am alittle confused why the Bengals need to prove they are real when they beat the superbowl champs, are joint top in their division and only lost on a fluke play to an undefeated team… (And that undefeated team are being insulted as well as last week it was said that IF they beat the Cowboys they are for real now it’s being said that they have to beat NE to be called real)
Yes against the Browns the Bengals looked less impressive but there are obvious factors beginning with the Special Teams. We could have been 17-0 up within the first half and if we had any kick coverage it would have stayed at that length for the whole game. But Good (and Great) teams crap up and find ways to win by hook or by crook. (if you give up THAT many yards on kick/punts And still win you are a good team!)
After the top five teams you could rank the next 10 about anywhere.
They have all lost and have shown signs of weakness, and have lost to teams that teams they beat lost to, so it doesn’t surprise me seeing the Bengals at 8th, 11th or 15th. But Peter King ranking the Packers as high as he did (10th) when they lost to the Bengals badly and barely beat the Bears who spotted them four picks and a god awful St. Louis team was insane. I wonder where he ranks them now?
ESPN’s accessment seems about right after the showing in the Browns game. We beat the Ravens and we deserve to be in the top 10 for sure, maybe as high as 6th.

by 




















