UPDATE: Larry Johnson signs contract, reportedly gets veteran minimum, Orien Harris gets the axe
The Cincinnati Bengals and running back Larry Johnson have agreed to terms and the "deal is done", writes Mike Florio at Pro Football Talk. As of this posting, neither the Bengals nor Johnson's agent Peter Schaffer had announced anything official. But we're sure a nice morning announcement will be scheduled, maybe even with the introduction of Johnson to the press and fans.
The initial thought was that the Bengals were concerned enough about Cedric Benson's injury that they contacted and invited Johnson for a workout. However, Marvin Lewis said during the press conference Monday afternoon, that he "spoke to Larry Johnson last Thursday, and I wanted to visit with him about his future." ESPN's Michael Smith wrote that the Bengals were one of several teams to express interest before Sunday.
Which means the Bengals were interested before Benson's injury on Sunday.
Johnson's legal troubles are well documented. He's been arrested four times since 2003. The charges include felony aggravated assault and misdemeanor domestic battery when he waved a gun at his girlfriend at the time. Charges were later dropped. A woman made an accusation that Johnson pushed her to the ground. The case was dropped because the accuser didn't appear in the hearings. In 2008, he allegedly pushed a woman's head and his fourth arrest came when he spit a drink in a woman's face. He pled guilty to both and sentenced to two years of probation.
Nice.
Johnson's career peaked, so far, between 2005 and 2006 when he rushed for 3,539 yards and recorded 37 rushing touchdowns. He was a threat out of the backfield in the passing game too, catching 74 passes in that time frame.
I understand the points against signing Johnson. I've made them myself.
From a purely football perspective, Johnson does bring something to the table. Even though he only carried the football seven times on Sunday, Benson is still the league leader with 205 rushing attempts. He's nine rushing attempts from reaching a career-high 214 attempts in 2008. Furthermore, Benson is hurt. What better scenario than to give give Benson a game or two off to rest and recover, allowing a healthier and stronger Benson during the stretch run towards the playoffs.
I know what you're saying. What about the Bernard Scott and Brian Leonard committee. I wondered that myself. But we honestly don't know whether either running back can be a 20-carry feature back. Scott said he felt great after a 13-carry performance against a hard-hitting Steelers defense. And, as Lewis said, this potential signing is merely an insurance policy.
UPDATE: Contract Signed and Benson responds. Joe Reedy tweets that the contract is signed and that we're just waiting for the official announcement. Reedy also tweets a Cedric Benson comment, "It’s good for him. I was once in that position and he’s getting his opportunity again."
UPDATE: Schefter provides contract situation. ESPN's Adam Schefter writes that "Larry Johnson gets $4 million Chiefs owed him AND veteran minimum Bengals will pay him AND chance to play for contender." This is Johnson's seventh season, so he's accrued six seasons. Estimates are that he should get between $630,000-$730,000.
UPDATE: Bengals cut Orien Harris to make room for Johnson. For the second time, the Bengals excused themselves of defensive tackle Orien Harris for a running back. The first, a trade with St. Louis for Brian Leonard. The second, released to make room for Larry Johnson.
0 recs |
80 comments
|
Comments
On the committee
Sure we don’t know if they can be 20 carry backs, but we don’t know if LJ is gonna be worth a shit with us either. Its clear he was either bad, or not trying while he was with KC this year. Sure the line was putrid, but Jamaal Charles appears to be just fine running behind them averaging something like 5.9 yards a carry.
I do however agree with you that Benson needs a break. 400 carries is not a good thing for any back ever. Johnson himself is a fine example of what that type of pounding can do to your career. Scott, to me looked fine against the Steelers, he was doing a good job finding the holes and helped us seal the victory. So he can only get better against three bad opponents.
On another note, any idea who they will let go to make room for this new criminal mind? Fui I assume?
by St. Esiason on Nov 17, 2009 1:33 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I also agree that Benson needs a break, good points.
But I’m gonna have to side with (IF)Chris on this one(as I see you are too). I don’t even view LJ as a stopgap at this point. As I have stated even in the rumor thread Hell Motherfracking(Battlestar Galactica reference)No, I don’t like this signing. I don’t want to feel like a broken record here.But I am. Read my other comments about this and you will know how I feel. I know you have J. Kirkendall, but this is more directed at those who may have missed my points.
Again, great work as always, J-Kirk. I’ll read you over Hobson any day of the week.
by Danimal, Destroyer of Worlds on Nov 17, 2009 3:37 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Scott's contribution to the commitee
Scott looks to be the Kick Returner now. That adds to his contributions to the game. He was winded after kick last week, and Leonard came in. It is clear the Bengals coaching staff doesn’t see Leonard as a feature back because they threw to Leonard on that 1st down when they were trying to take time off the clock. I don’t think LJ will dress unless one of the others can’t. I also hope this is a one year minimum salary deal with no intent to bring him back next year. But I am OK with the signing.
(At some point I am going to misspell signing as singing and will be mocked.)
by jim0ijk on Nov 17, 2009 8:47 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
yeah, Leonard didn’t look like a useful runner of the ball (unless you HAD to use him). However Leonard looks like a great H-back/Passing RB who can pass block and catch those swing passes.
It does appear that LJ would be the 4th running back (as in a direct replacement for Benson’s style of running but behind the roles of Scott> kick returner and scat back and behind Leonard> 3rd down specialist/H-back)
by Sheffieldbengal on Nov 17, 2009 9:12 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm okay with it too, THIS YEAR.
And especially with Oakland and Detroit up next. Throw him out there, let Ced rest up for the Minnesota game and bring him back. Scott is too valuable on the kick, but if and when he rips off a few more of those long runs, the next series is a bust for him. And Leonard is better after the catch. So what do we have to lose. Right now we’re playing for a SuperBowl. And a few months, that’s not enough time for LJ to punch someone … or is it?
by Pastor Allen on Nov 17, 2009 12:58 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Mixed Feelings about the signing of L.J
I understand the signing of L.J. We do need some extra insurance in case any of our running backs go downwith serious injuries. However I feel L.J should only be used as an insurance policy . The other guys have earned roles in our offense and earned the carries. Even if Benson cant play this upcoming game against Oakland I feel the combination of B.Scott and B.Leonard will be effective with out offensive line opening up wholes as theyve done all season. Overall, I feel L.J is a proven guy in this leauge therefore this isnt a bad pickup. But like i said only use him as an insurance policy, Benson and our other backs are good enough to carry us through the season should they stay healthy. In Marvin we trust, hell make sure L.J isnt a cancer in the locker room and continue our success. WHO DEY!
by diehard fan on Nov 17, 2009 1:35 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
lj
jamal charles averaged 5.9 yards against the raiders… that is not something to be comparing LJ too. he will be able to run very good behind our offensive line. come playoff time the 2 headed monster in LJ and Ced is going to be scary to our oppenents. and my money is on cutting scott kooistra again since i hear evan mathis is back to being healthy
by whodeyocho on Nov 17, 2009 1:39 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
No he has done it all season
He averaged 5.7 yards against the Raiders. He’s over 6 YPC the rest of the season.
by St. Esiason on Nov 17, 2009 2:03 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Jamal Charles is just better then LJ
Im a Chiefs fan, I will tell you LJ is finished. Even when our O line did open holes he couldnt do anything. Also, Why dont you go look at LJ’s average against the Raiders weeks 2. lol it wasnt close to Charles. LJ has more negative plays then anyone in the league man. He has fell done before being touched by anyone close to tackling him 20 times.
OHANA!
by darwithabar on Nov 17, 2009 2:44 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree with you there
I will probably vent about this on Arrowhead Pride as well.
by Danimal, Destroyer of Worlds on Nov 17, 2009 3:38 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Funny, LJ had only 75 yards when the Chiefs played the Raiders in October.
On 10 more carries, too. So yeah, about that…
by IFChris on Nov 17, 2009 11:42 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
yep...
take out the outlier (44 yard TD run) and Charles’ numbers are pretty similar.
[I know you can’t really discount the TD run, but I’m saying that the normal/mean/whatever run is about the same as Johnson was getting]
That'd be the butt, bob.
by supergrover on Nov 17, 2009 1:10 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
LJ In Cinci because...
Reports were out that LJ had been talking with The Bengals since last Thursday… the dire need to possibly sign a power back became more so on Sunday when Benson left the game. One thing that I have not seen anyone mention is did anyone think that MAYBE Cinci went after LJ to keep him from where he wanted to go? Yes, I’m talking about LOVELY PITTSBURGH. Yes, Cinci Put it ON PITT again but still The Steelers are RIGHT THERE in the Standings. Sure, Mendenhall had a monster game a few weeks back but he has had ‘fumble’ problems. LJ Could have and would have solved that problem in the Steel City.
But, bottom line is Cinci got LJ. And its a good thing they acted “NOW” because I am sure PHILLY would have offered him the world to come play there now that Westbrooks carreer may be a bit hazzy, no pun intended.
Again, Bottom line, Cinci bagged themselves an LJ and now lets see what happens next. I have heard that Cinci’s finest have already been put on high alert, but seriously Larry Johnson WILL PLAY. I really doubt you pick a guy up and put him on the Bench unless your whole plan was to keep him away from your rivals…and if that is the case Let me be one of the first to say Good Luck Bengals Cant wait to see what LJ Tweets First: something like: …“Man, This Place is a Jungle! We are up 42-3 , Huh, oh, gotta go, coach is putting me in… shoot what do I do with my cell?”
by ChrisB_21 on Nov 17, 2009 4:00 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
A power back, maybe,
But at almost 30 with little left in the tank, I don’t see LJ playing a huge role for us. I don’t think Pitt would have taken a flyer on the guy either. Hate the Stoolers as much as the next Junglist, but I know they don’t take chances on guys with character issues.
by Danimal, Destroyer of Worlds on Nov 17, 2009 4:29 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
No power in the back they signed.
Maybe three seasons ago when he was running behind the best line in football, but not now.
by IFChris on Nov 17, 2009 11:43 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i hate this signing
tons of baggage. past his prime. tons of baggage. doesn’t know the system. tons of baggage. going to hurt team chemistry. tons of baggage. how long until he opens his mouth and says something to embarrass the bengals.
would have been better use the backs we have.
by palewook on Nov 17, 2009 5:46 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I want to give the Bengals the benefit of the doubt
but why take a chance on disturbing a strength of the team- team chemistry. The Bengals might have contacted LJ last week, just like a handful of other teams, however without Benson’s injury LJ would not be a Bengal today. This move reaks of Benson having either a more serious injury than let on or an injury that is going to be nagging and problematic for the remainder of the season.
Best case senario Johnson fills in with 10+ carries a game until Benson is good. Worst case Benson never regains his power this season and LJ doesn’t have the motor to fill Benson’s shoes even in spot duty. Both senarios are predicated on LJ becoming a “good” Bengal reclaimation project (keeping mouth shut and out of trouble off the field) and assimilating into the 2009 Bengal culture.
I just don’t think Scott can take the pounding between the tackles.
by featherman on Nov 17, 2009 7:14 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I think the strength of this team is what Johnson needs.
I think that a positive environment, like the one we apparently have in the locker room, is exactly what Johnson needs. There can’t be any kind of chemistry in the Chiefs organization, thanks to the MASSIVE rebuilding project they’re undertaking. Larry Johnson was the most recognized and famous person in that organization, and hewanted to be the star. I just hope he’s able to know his role here. I think that Ced and Carson and Chad and Keith and Domata and Marvin and others will help him keep his place in check.
I do think it’s smart though to keep Ced out for a week or two. Split carries between Scott/Johnson (with Leonard filling the 3rd-down role) for sure against Oakland, and maybe till Minnesota.
"If it wasn't this, it'd be something else."
by ZJiff30 on Nov 17, 2009 7:45 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
James Schmid the Great says
Just wait til he has a 60 or 70 yard run and has a big role in the Bengals winning a game, and all the naysayers will be jumping off their bandwagon and jumping onto Larry Johnson bandwagaon. There is a great inner strength or core in that locker room. One man will not come in and disrupt that. Peko and the group will not allow it to happen. And another thing who with out a doubt knows Ced can continue with all those carrries? I dont. So you bring in a guy who didnt want to play where he was, give him a total different look and great things can happen. And also Scott is a great scat back, but he cant break tackles, he would be beat up running between tackles and then what? So sit back and relax and be thankful there is a guy named Larry Johnson available.
by James Schmid the great on Nov 17, 2009 8:58 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
If LJ breaks a 70 yard run I’d be the first to jump on the bandwagon, but I don’t think he’s got those skills left in the tank. The bottom line is – he’s not that good anymore.
This is our year!
by Carsonorbust on Nov 17, 2009 11:38 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i don’t like this move. It has happened and i just hope LJ takes full advantage of it and keeps quiet and works hard.
I think i agree with what Wyche said in an NFL chat that this renting of LJ will see him on his best behaviour because he doesn’t want to be done with the NFL yet and as it is a short deal then LJ will be playing for a new contract from some team (playing for a contract always makes RBs better).
I don’t think he’ll ruin our locker chemistry because he isn’t THE team and he’ll be treated like any other guy… he won’t be THE guy.
Also, as he was meant to have been very impressive in his workout for the team i hope he has some juice left and i guess we just have to hope he runs like a beast if we have to give Benson some games off so that he is fresh for the playoffs (playoffs? dont talk to me about playoffs!)
by Sheffieldbengal on Nov 17, 2009 9:09 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Two words people:
3 yards and a pile of dust
by Hudepohl Dey on Nov 17, 2009 9:12 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
It's a done deal
so let’s hope for the best.
by featherman on Nov 17, 2009 11:46 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm okay with this.
… besides, listening to WLW, he would fit in with some of the weekday callers…
I hope it doesn’t backfire.
That'd be the butt, bob.
by supergrover on Nov 17, 2009 9:24 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
...
Though we do have a tendency to sign controversial players, we´ve also done a good job in turning their careers around (Benson, Henry). I trust Marvin on this one.
If you don't live like you wanna, you live like you shouldn't
by trotanoy on Nov 17, 2009 9:28 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
in my opinion, i honestly don't think scott and leonard can get it done.
scott was able to find some holes late in the Pitt game, but he’s been largely ineffective in the running game with just 3.3 ypc. he also doesn’t have a single carry in the red zone and i don’t even want to see him in on the goal line. he’s a good role player in the passing game but he’s not the guy you hang your hat on in a playoff run. he’s just not ready.
leonard has a career 3.4 ypc and ZERO CAREER OFFENSIVE TOUCHDOWNS. ZERO. he’s had plenty of chances to establish himself in the run game but he simply is not the answer. as with scott, leonard is good in the passing game but he can’t run the ball.
now, what if scott gets hurt? what if leonard gets hurt? what if benson stays hurt or gets hurt again? that’s why you get insurance policies—for all the what-ifs. i get that.
so why LJ? he’s been there before. he was the best back in the league at one point. he’s better than anybody else available. i don’t think we could have asked for a better scenario from a pure football perspective. yeah, he has baggage, but i really do believe he’ll keep his mouth shut and play his balls off. he’s in a contract year now and this is his big-stage audition for his future team. marvin isn’t going to let us down. it’s the best possible move given the circumstances.
by GrooveLeg on Nov 17, 2009 9:29 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
good job Groovy
3 yards and a pile of dust
by Hudepohl Dey on Nov 17, 2009 9:44 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i like this post....BUT
if scott got hurt, we could pull dorsey from the UFL.
by brandone on Nov 17, 2009 9:56 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
not a bad idea.
last i checked, DeDe wasn’t doing too badly. at least he’s kept himself in football shape regardless of the level of competition.
by GrooveLeg on Nov 17, 2009 10:17 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Scott just got it down against the Steelers.
by IFChris on Nov 17, 2009 11:44 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i know scott won the game for us against Pittsburgh
but i don’t trust him to do it week in and week out for the rest of the season and into the playoffs. what if benson is hurt for an extended amount of time?
i know you’re unhappy about signing LJ so we might have differing opinions of the reality of the Nard Dog (b. scott). i stand by it that it’s the best possible move given the circumstances.
by GrooveLeg on Nov 17, 2009 12:05 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
LJ would not have produced the way Scott did against the Steelers
He hasn’t shown signs of being that kind of back in two-plus seasons. Once again, if Johnson contributes to a win AND changes his surly attitude, I’ll be the first to admit I was wrong about him.
Until that time, I’ll take B-Scott everyday and twice on Sundays.
by IFChris on Nov 17, 2009 12:12 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i guess i can't disagree since LJ doesn't return kicks
but i would put money on it the he could at least get 33 yards on 13 carries. even though it’s not the LJ of old, he’s capable of at least that. maybe a change of scenery will do him good. look what it did for benson.
i hear you loud and clear about LJ and i agree—he needs to keep his mouth shut and do what he’s told—but i’m also curious, are you opposed to this move because it’s Larry Johnson or because you think Bernard Scott deserves to play a bigger role in the offense?
by GrooveLeg on Nov 17, 2009 12:35 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I doubt LJ would have gotten 33 yards on 13 carries
in the Pitt game. Dude falls down when a guy so much as breathes on him.
by Danimal, Destroyer of Worlds on Nov 17, 2009 12:41 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
LJ
Don’t get me wrong, Scott’s emergence only strengthens my opinion, but after being around LJ’s bullshit for almost three seasons now here in KC, I just don’t think he belongs on a team that appears to have shed its past history of malcontents and is moving forward.
But, I will admit I was wrong if LJ gives me reason to.
by IFChris on Nov 17, 2009 12:51 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
fair enough.
only time will tell, and i’ll admit if i’m wrong as well. we should set up a “told you so” thread for the day that happens. i’ll fully participate if that’s the case! :)
by GrooveLeg on Nov 17, 2009 12:57 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Hey, yeah...
and then we can get that 1austin whomever to come and quote you and everything! LOL
by TheWalrus1971 on Nov 17, 2009 2:52 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Winning makes everyone happy
Even TO is happy when they’re winning games. I would worry about LJ in years past but at this point he’s probably just happy to have a legitimate chance at a deep playoff run
by JHarmann on Nov 17, 2009 10:08 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Financial Decision by MB?
I wouldn’t put it past Scrooge McDuck that this “insurance policy” is as much about gaining leverage with resigning Benson as it is about depth on the team.
by JHarmann on Nov 17, 2009 10:10 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I think this is an OK move...
ML says it is insurance and I believe him. Listen, Leonard is a very good player. He has not made a single bad play all year. If there was a yard to be made – he made it. He is tough and does not give up the rock. He is great in his role as a blocker, short yardage back and swing receiver. He is not a feature back and he will be the first to admit it.
The same is true of Scott. He is very capable in his role as a returner and as a speed back. Benson is our feature back but he is carrying a bit too big of a load. LJ will give him the occasional break he needs to stay strong for a playoff run. We still have a lot of work to do and a playoff spot is not in the bag yet.
Look at it from LS’s point of view. He leaves a bad team and goes to a playoff contender. He has a chance, maybe, to get a ring. He is going into a strong locker room from a weak one. He has one chance to show other prospective teams that he can still do it. If he is a disruption his career is practically over. He is a bit dumb but he is not stupid. Our team leaders will step on him big time if he gets out of line as will ML. He knows we do not need him but are willing to give him a chance. He has zero leverage because if he causes trouble ML will simple deactivate him and let him watch from the sidelines as his career evaporates before his eyes.
" My enemy said "Love your enemy". I obeyed and loved myself." Gibran
by JUNGLEJOHN on Nov 17, 2009 10:12 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
i agree on pretty much everything
except that i think he’ll get a job somewhere regardless of disruptions. there’s always the raiders, cowboys, patriots… somebody will give him a chance and say they’ll be able to change him.
by GrooveLeg on Nov 17, 2009 10:21 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Benson has a two year contract.I don’t think it has anything to do with leverage. It is what it is, short term insurance.It’s a contract for the rest of the year at the league minimum. In other words the Bengals couldn’t get him or anyone else cheaper.If he starts to be disruptive they can let him go and it has minimal impact on the salary cap. I agree with earlier comments that one player cannot disrupt the team chemistry.I really think there is little risk in this transaction.My only concern is who has to go and I think it has to be Fui.Historically the Bengals carry four RBs on their roster.They now have six.
by redberkey on Nov 17, 2009 10:17 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Sorry
As a lifetime Chiefs fan I just want to say Sorry for for this signing of a washed up woman abusing piece of cat shit. I hope his cancer dosen’t spread to the rest of your team. He will pout and bitch as soon as he dosen’t get his way and will give up. He is soft.
by Beaten and Abused on Nov 17, 2009 10:39 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
thanks for the input but i respectfully hope you're wrong :)
by GrooveLeg on Nov 17, 2009 10:44 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Actually so do I, I have always liked the Bengals and would like to see them go far this year.
by Beaten and Abused on Nov 17, 2009 3:09 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
My hope again
The Bengals will show him the door immediately if he does. We lose nothing by cutting him. Hopefully Marvin will tell him or already has “if you want out, leave, otherwise its my way.”
by jim0ijk on Nov 17, 2009 10:46 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I hope this doesn't blow up in Marvin's face
First time I shot her, shot her in the side.
Hard to watch her suffer, but with the second shot she died...
by btcoop71 on Nov 17, 2009 11:54 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Jim Anderson is the key to whether this works
Anderson has been in this league a looong time and through all the really bad years, one thing the Bengals have had is success with kind of re-tread RB (Icky, Brooks, Garrison Hearst, Corey, Rudi, Benson). Even the RB we drafted busted it was because of injuries (ie Perry & Ki-Jana), not due to lack of coaching.
Sooo, if Anderson can work his magic, get Larry to buy into his program and accept his role…then just maybe this works out for 7 weeks. maybe….I still think I’m going to be sick.
by swebbIL on Nov 17, 2009 11:54 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Icky, Core, Rudy were our Draft picks
Icky and Corey #2s and Rudy #4. Brooks was traded for Pete Johnson and draft picks for a Brooks still in his prime. Therefore, only Hearst and Benson should be considered “re-treads”.
If LJ has anymore gas I think Jim A will get the most out of him. LJ has to get into the playbook and practice with the O-line before he will even be considered to play/be active.
by featherman on Nov 17, 2009 12:51 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
re-treads was the wrong word
I should have said “RB that had limited expectations of success at the time that they were brought to the Bengals and then performed well above those expectations”
but that doesn’t quite have the same ring
by swebbIL on Nov 17, 2009 1:16 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
sorry I don't know why
I felt the need to be knit picky. Larry Johnson just makes me nervous. He’s already running his mouth on twitter.
by featherman on Nov 17, 2009 1:33 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
now that the deal is done, i have to homerize. so, welcome aboard lj. i admired your work at penn state. may you study the ways of cedric benson and turn your career around on the way to the superbowl.
just stay out the damn clubs.
i'm going to go america all over your ass!
by Raging Clue on Nov 17, 2009 12:40 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Good pickup for Cincy
I think LJ is going to take full advantage of this opportunity. KC was holding him back with their perpetual rebuilding. LJ is not such a bad guy at all. I’ve been keeping up with him on this site lockerblogger.com. By the way, Cincy is looking great right now with Oakland, Cleveland, and Detroit standing in their way the next few weeks.
by NewYorkDT on Nov 17, 2009 12:46 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Yay!!! Mayor Bee Mayor Bee!!!

CB85......Collaros for Heisman
by TennBengalfan on Nov 17, 2009 12:52 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Lets put it this way
…I drafted LJ on my fantasy team based on the theory he would have a bounce back year. Unfortunately, the Chiefs are so awful that it doesn’t really matter and he’s been riding the bench. Maybe this is his bounce back year, just in orange and black stripes.
I am concerned about how were are going to juggle the roster spots, particularly if we hope to see Smith, Coffman, or Simpson this year.
Groovelegs point earlier in the thread is a good one. Leonard is a nice supersub but if he gets more than 10 touches a game, you know you’re in trouble. Scott could develop into a nice committee back, garnering 15-20 touches a game with a few through the air, but he’s not there yet. He had a great game against the Steelers, his best of the year, but the statline is 13 carries, 33 yards, 2.5 avg and 1 reception. Lets not make him the crown prince just yet.
by goffchile on Nov 17, 2009 1:13 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
One thing I haven't seen mentioned
in regard to the team being in contact with Johnson circa Thursday last; Lap said, on Mo’s show, that Ced was already hurt- either in last week’s game or just a cumulative sort of thing, and was limited this past week in practice accordingly. So, this was something Marvin et al were aware of going in. If he only ever functions as the football equivalent of an innings-eater like Bronson Aroyo, LJ should, at the very least, save some tread on Ced’s tires.
by IgnatiusJReilly on Nov 17, 2009 1:18 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
John Clayton liked it..
On Mike & Mike this morning they asked John Clayton about the LJ signing whether it would cause a disruption, and he said that this was a totally different Bengals locker room. They do their job and don’t expect much in the way of congratulations, and he said that the leadership in the locker room is much stronger than he’d ever seen. So he thought it was a good move only because Johnson should remain in a limited role and just provide quality depth through the end of the season, and if he acts up or causes any distractions they can cut him loose without losing a thing.
This doesn’t make me like this anymore, but at least is somewhat calming to hear this from an objective observer, and Clayton is one of the VERY few who qualifies.
by swebbIL on Nov 17, 2009 1:22 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
LJ May Be A Bust, But...
We need insurance at RB for the season we’re putting together. Benson can’t continue with the 30+ carries and needs time to heal. Plus Scott could get hurt too so adding a veteran RB makes sense. I wouldn’t worry about the locker room being affected as our team has the right mindset. We don’t lose much money-wise so accept the move and let things play out. If LJ causes any problems, we’ll dump him, but we may just need this guy.
by laibach on Nov 17, 2009 1:29 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Press conference any minute on 1530homer live
Link
http://1530homer.com/cc-common/ondemand/player.html?world=st
CB85......Collaros for Heisman
by TennBengalfan on Nov 17, 2009 3:15 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
on right now
CB85......Collaros for Heisman
by TennBengalfan on Nov 17, 2009 3:22 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I thought he said the right things
Not quite as humble as he could’ve been, but he seemed to understand that he’s going to have to work to get on the field so that’s good I guess.
by cmick on Nov 17, 2009 3:38 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yea he did say all the right things IMO
CB85......Collaros for Heisman
by TennBengalfan on Nov 17, 2009 3:45 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
im pumped
WHO DEY!!!!
CB85......Collaros for Heisman
by TennBengalfan on Nov 17, 2009 3:27 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Any quotes from the presser?
Blogger at CincyJungle.com -- SB Nation Cincinnati Bengals blog.
by Kirkendall on Nov 17, 2009 3:47 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
He knows he will have to work to be on the field
Marvin was asked if he would play sunday and quote “Stay Tuned”
CB85......Collaros for Heisman
by TennBengalfan on Nov 17, 2009 3:50 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
And Larry was asked if he is looking forward to playing KC
he said “I would be lying if I wasnt excited about playing them”
CB85......Collaros for Heisman
by TennBengalfan on Nov 17, 2009 3:50 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Im sorry missed a few words
“I would be lying if i said I wasnt excited about playing them”
CB85......Collaros for Heisman
by TennBengalfan on Nov 17, 2009 3:52 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
And that it would be a great Christmas present
If he was active against them.
by cmick on Nov 17, 2009 4:08 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
be a great gift for us all
CB85......Collaros for Heisman
by TennBengalfan on Nov 17, 2009 4:09 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
when asked about the gay slurr..
I am sure it offended gay activists all over the world.
by 80%OFTHETIMEIMRIGHTEVERYTIME on Nov 17, 2009 4:00 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
FYI
Bengals.com reports that Utech and Chatman have been released. Too bad those two experiments never really took off.
by cmick on Nov 17, 2009 4:13 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
awesome in my opinion
CB85......Collaros for Heisman
by TennBengalfan on Nov 17, 2009 4:15 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The Chiefs and Larry Johnson are in the middle of a case to determine whether or not the Chiefs have to pay Johnson this year’s installment of his signing bonus. The day before his suspension was supposed to up, Chiefs’ management had Larry Johnson released, though he probably won’t clear waivers. It’s rumored that he might get picked up later by the Washington Redskins, as they need a running back – but it isn’t anywhere close to certain. At any rate, aside from guaranteed quick cash from contracts, after the Chiefs had Larry Johnson released might have a more stable locker room, which might lead them to win a few more games.
by Ramir_U on Nov 18, 2009 5:34 AM EST reply actions 0 recs

by 


















