BREAKING: Shaun Smith cut already, three days later.
Well, that didn't take long. Here's the story from PFT.
This makes me feel good. This makes me feel very, very good. This tells me that out of all the other "dubious" signings we've had on tap this year, that had Larry Johnson or anyone else not brought what the Bengals were looking for to the table that the result would have been just this.
A player who was brought in for a legitimate need, who seemed to be the best fit physically for the need for which he was brought in, was cut a mere three days after his arrival. That apology that he reportedly called Marvin Lewis to offer got him in the door, but he didn't have any staying power (I mean really, three days?) because the team did not feel he was the asset they had hoped.
I don't know if it was a locker room issue or an on-the-field issue, but the Bengals clearly weren't impressed. So they cut him loose. Again, after THREE DAYS. Anyone think that everyone else in the locker room isn't taking notice of that?
Good job, Bengals. This is what we like to see.
A Pragmatic Bengals Fan
0 recs |
15 comments
|
Comments
They're probably
just trying to put him on the practice squad, right?
by occams_tiger_teeth on Dec 12, 2009 2:39 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
actually im sorry, i shouldnt have laughed
Only players within their first 3 years can go to the practice squad
"Ghiaciuc's play was a distraction"
by firstPick on Dec 12, 2009 2:42 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Don't get too excited
We needed a backup DB more than a backup tackle that would have been inactive and for whom there is no real call for on other teams.
They could easily re-sign him after Sunday.
by rorschach1979 on Dec 12, 2009 2:39 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
That means we put Chase on IR for no reaseon
"Ghiaciuc's play was a distraction"
by firstPick on Dec 12, 2009 2:41 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
no someone will be activated from the practice squad
or signed off the street
by featherman on Dec 12, 2009 3:04 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
unless, of course, he has bone spurs
I guess a winning record brings out freaks.
by supergrover on Dec 13, 2009 12:27 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Rico Murray
was signed off the practice squad because of the situation with crocker and hebert. i’m still glad to get rid of that tub of lard though.
by elguapo09 on Dec 12, 2009 3:06 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I wouldn't be surprised if they resign Smith
Every NFL team cuts a fringe player, or a player that will otherwise be inactive, in order to activate a player for a position in need for an upcoming game. Given the questionable status of Crocker, and even Hebert, I think they needed to go DB heavy for this game, making the inactive Smith expendable. He could be bak as soon as Monday. with Murray back to the PS or someone else cut. We’ve done that twice this year with Scott Kooistra and a few years ago with Kenny Watson. ANd there’s always the chance that Smith just pissed everyone off on the team in a few short days lol…
by whodeyla on Dec 12, 2009 3:16 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Agree with whodeyla
The Pats do it all the time. The odds of someone else signing Smith are remote.They need the DB for this week. And they will probably have a need for another DT after this week. Unless SS did something stupid and I would think we would have heard about it by now it really doesn’t make much sense to bring him in for a try out, sign him and then cut him 3 days later. But stranger things have happened.
by redberkey on Dec 12, 2009 3:23 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
way to go rico! local boys represent!
i'm going to go america all over your ass!
by Raging Clue on Dec 12, 2009 3:36 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
odd post
The gleeful chortling in this post is just wierd. And probably premature. At ML’s wednesday presser he clearly seemed doubtful about activating Shaun Smith for the Vikings game. It seems likely that he was cut as part of a roster shuffle to add a DB. But I didn’t know that Rico Murray was a Safety-he has always been listed as a CB. If he has been practicing as a FS, that must explain why they added Mickens and Antonio Smith to the practice squad and released Brannon Condren. Anyway, the Bengals have been very thin at Safety since Roy Williams went down, carrying only 3 on the 53 man roster (does Kyries H. really count as a position player?). Gee, I really hope Crocker can go against the Vikes. If not, the Bengals will have to go with 2 undrafted free agent rookies at FS! That would be interesting,to say the least.
by virginiastripes on Dec 13, 2009 6:28 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
It wasn't "gleeful chortling."
It was happiness at an apparent stand that our favorite team could have possibly been making with a player who has proven to be a real locker room problem.
by A Pragmatic Bengals Fan on Dec 14, 2009 12:27 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs


















