If the season were to end today: Then it would be the shortest season since 1982
If you're like me, you get nervous about some of the most trivial things. Such as making sure you save your game every chance you get so you don't have to replay an entire level on Dragon Age, spending 20 minutes to conquer minions of the Blight. Another thing that gets me nervous, especially since we've seen a collapse before, is that for the past few weeks the Bengals only needed to win one game to clinch the AFC North. That doesn't sound anything like 2006, does it? And honestly, for the past few weeks, I've settled on the fact that I do believe we'll clinch it before the season ends. I do believe that the Bengals will make the playoffs. Damn it, the Bengals are making it too interesting.
Before playing the Minnesota Vikings on December 6, the Bengals and Chargers were 9-3. Since then, the Chargers are 11-3 and the Bengals are 9-5. Cincinnati is eliminated from winning the second seed, have fallen from the third seed and now occupy the fourth seed after the Patriots beat the Bills pushing them into the third seed by a tie-breaker (strength of victory I think). Granted, Cincinnati has played two playoff opponents in the past two weeks, Minnesota and San Diego, that currently sport 22 wins combined. Cincinnati lost both games and lost three of their past five (wins against the Browns and the Lions), while still one win away from clinching the AFC North. Things have stalled. Progress slow, if at all existent. Too interesting indeed.
Theoretically, the Bengals should beat Kansas City. Realistically, the Bengals have played down to their opponents this year. However, the reality of Chris Henry's passing could largely impact the team while most of the players and coaches head to New Orleans for Henry's funeral. The Jets are playing decent football, winning three of their past four, and will play their guts out no matter what their playoff implications are at that point. Could the Bengals lose their final two games? My heart says no, of course not. That's ridiculous. Curse you, Kirkendall. String him up alive, boys. On the other hand... well we go there until next week depending on what Cincinnati does with Kansas City.
Baltimore plays Pittsburgh, who have lost five of their past six games. After Pittsburgh, the Ravens head to Oakland. It's a very real possibility that the Ravens win out. All of this can be avoided if the Bengals win one of their two games. Just a win. That's all. However, Cincinnati's recent losses have pushed the Bengals into the fourth seed, which means that Cincinnati will play the top Wild Card team -- right now, the Baltimore Ravens.
Why do the Bengals have to make it so interesting?
0 recs |
14 comments
|
Comments
come on, doubters...
we are not going to lose either of the next two games.
by GrooveLeg on Dec 21, 2009 3:22 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
+1
I like your spirti Groove! I voted “no” just because I have to be honest that I have been worried for awhile. From the beginning of the season though, we’ve been saying that there was something special about this team and I, for one, still believe it.
This is our year!
by Carsonorbust on Dec 21, 2009 8:00 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Just beat KC
and clinch the thing. Week 17 suspense is not good.
by goffchile on Dec 21, 2009 3:37 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Baltimore
in my opinion, has a larger possibility of losing both games since they are on the road. They have no secondary, oakland is playing better and beating good teams, and pittsburgh should beat them this time. Also, I’d rather the Bengals face the Ravens in the first round of the playoffs instead of Tennessee, Miami, Pitt or Houston.
by elguapo09 on Dec 21, 2009 4:01 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I agree.
Baltimore has no easy task. I think the Steelers beat the Ravens and Oakland is playing with some confidence now.
Prediction: Bengals will win big over KC. Palmer will throw at least 3 TDs. Combined running game of over 200 yards.
by CalBob on Dec 21, 2009 4:13 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Play-offs, youu want to talk about play-offs?
Cincy actually has the easiest road remaining of all teams that have not clinched. Our remaining opponents are 10-12, and one of them is at home. Baltimore and Jacksonville are tied for next lowest opponent record at 12-16, but both of them have 2 road games. Denver is next at 13-15, but they have to play at 10-4 philly. All the rests opponents are at least even.
There is no reason we shouldn’t be the AFC 3 seed, and playing for another shot at San Diego.
by jim0ijk on Dec 21, 2009 6:13 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Grab that 3 seed and we go more than likely back to san diego
That is more preferable than Indy,of course we would need to win our wildcard first, Of all the teams I want baltimore least,its tough to take a team out 3 times in the one season
by pilks1075 on Dec 21, 2009 7:02 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Exactly
I would hate to play Baltimore again i hope they drop a game and we get a rematch with Denver at home and get to see Dhani lay some wood on Brandon Stokley
by Purple City Middie on Dec 22, 2009 5:48 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
That would be nice
If we can KEEP playing like we did last week this week (AND clean up some more penalties) then we have a decent chance at that. And at least we’d be at home whatever happens.
by FriarBob on Dec 22, 2009 8:31 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Brandon Stokely Gnaws on my brain
he must be punished
by featherman on Dec 22, 2009 10:55 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I do not understand the logic of wanting a matchup with a team we LOST to vs a matchup against a team we beat twice. I would LOVE another AFCN showdown in the wildcard round; the Bengals have demonstrated an ability to excel in them.
by Todd G on Dec 22, 2009 2:54 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
If not for Stokely's fluke play
We would have beat Denver.
Slim 15, you will be missed. RIP Chris Henry
by Danimal, Destroyer of Worlds on Dec 23, 2009 4:34 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs

by 
















