Week 13 Recap: The Sprout of Doubt
The Cincinnati Bengals completed their ninth win of the season, ensuring them of their second winning season in the last 19 years, but it's been the team's drawbacks that are now forced into the limelight.
It's become an inescapable fact that the offense lacks the passing attack it enjoyed for years in its heyday. Chris Henry's absence has affected the production of Andre Caldwell; Laveranues Coles continues to look like a man searching for his identity. The Bengals' tight ends may be the least dynamic men in the NFL, and Jeremi Johnson is of little relief to Carson on scrambling check-offs.
That leaves Chad Ochocinco as the team's lone passing threat, and as a result, the Bengals now run a monotonous and predictable offense that has been just good enough to win games. Fans and pundits are concerned with the lack of points and many are convinced that it won't be enough to win in the postseason.
In Cincinnati, worry has replaced elation.
Help might be on the way.
I remember Bob Bratkowski once saying that the game-plans are reevaluated in each quarter of the season. If that remains the case, we might see a shift in the play-calling during the home stretch to the Playoffs.
A good place to start the paradigm shift would be to revitalize the play of Caldwell. I realize that with Henry out, defenses can key on him when he runs underneath routes, but it still seems important to get those intermediate yards, especially on third downs. Early on in the season, Caldwell was instrumental in those come-from-behind wins and was on his way to earning the title "clutch player". Then he faded into obscurity with the rest of the passing game as the Bengals ran and ran and ran and ran.
Caldwell, or someone, has to become a reliable secondary weapon when Carson rolls out and has to improvise. A receiving tight end would be nice; if only they could draft a guy with some speed and good hands. A guy who could line up in the slot and become the safety valve every quarterback needs. Oh wait, the Bengals did draft a player like that, but have yet to play him once this season.
Edtors Note: All the follwing remarks about Chase Coffman are now irrelevent as he was put on IR with bone spurs today, but I didn't want to change the whole article so you'll have to deal with it.
I know that Marvin Lewis and his troop are a stubborn lot, especially this season. He's found a way of winning games doing things his way, so he must know something about running and maintaining his team. But ignoring Chase Coffman's ability to catch when the team could desperately use another play-maker seems like going overboard to prove a point.
Somehow, Daniel Coates dropped another touchdown pass against Detroit. You'd think he would have accidentally caught one by now. J.P. Foschi is okay, but the Bengals passing game needs a charge of energy, a spark, a flicker, anything. While he appears to be a proficient blocker and isn't awful when he goes out for a pass, he doesn't have the spark to light a birthday candle. Coffman does. Coffman can do (to a lesser degree) what Jason Whitten does for the Cowboys' offense. In college he often lined up in the slot and went on to catch more passes in history than any other collegiate tight end. A third-round draft pick was invested in the man; why is he not playing?
I used to defend Marvin's decision of refusing to play Coffman because he couldn't block. A man of his size should be able to keep tacklers at bay to some degree---look at Little Laveranues, or even Chad, of all people, blocking well down field. Blocking is an important attribute on a run-first offense, but that still doesn't excuse refusing to utilize the man's talents; talents that would help out arguably the worst position on the team.
Chris Henry's absence isn't the only one having a negative impact on this offense. Without Bernard Scott last week, the Bengals had no success running to the outside, being dropped for a loss on seven occasions. Cedric Benson was unable to turn the corner on every attempt outside of the tackles. After coming back from a strained hip muscle, it was both surprising and a little concerning that he was given the ball 36 times, especially when he appeared a step slower than he looked before the injury. The repeated runs up the middle could have been shared by a healthy Larry Johnson, but LJ was only used twice. Wearing out the team's best runner as soon as he returns to the line-up makes little sense to me.
Lastly, the penalties are officially out of control. Against the lowliest of foes, the Bengals stacked up a staggering 27 penalties in three games. Out of all the concerns facing this team, this obnoxious, festering penalty issue is the most serious and season-threatening. Self-inflicted harm is ruinous to the most talented of teams; for a group of blue-collard schleps like the Bengals, penalties in big games could easily become their demise. The coaches are to blame for this problem only to a certain extent. Players must show the discipline and focus it takes to play within the rules. They can be taught hand-placement and pre-snap cadence all day in practice, but then they have to actually go out and do it on game-day. Nine penalties a game just won't do.
All of these concerns become more valid after each passing week. So far the defense has been the ultimate neutralizer and the team's salvation. They are a rugged bunch of no-name hombres here to go to work and earn their living. They have kept the Bengals in the thick of things all season and have been fun to watch, but will it be enough? Can they keep it up?
The next two weeks will prove once and for all what we're dealing with from these Cincinnati Bengals. By the time the team returns home to play the Chiefs in Week 16, many of our questions will be answered. These two scenarios, however, seem most likely: the Bengals are either an unimaginative, type-caste team built upon the old-school conventions of defense and the rushing game, or they're a team with many quality parts that can adjust and adapt to win games. Time will tell.
Mojokong---Still a believer nonetheless.
20 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
It's frustrating that we never heard about Coffman's injury until today
I had also been hoping for him to help down the stretch and in the post-season if they make it. Something about the whole story seems funny. Bagdad Hob says players thought Coffman was effective in practice, yet he sat all year and now suddenly he’s Mr Hurt.
They really need someone else who’s a threat besides Ochocinco. The Vikes will sit on the run and double cover 8-5 and dare Palmer to beat them with someone else. Can Coles do it? Or Foschi? Or Caldwell? Maybe they should be throwing more passes to Ced and LJ?
by occams_tiger_teeth on Dec 9, 2009 3:52 PM EST reply actions
oh for christ's sake... another Debbie Downer...
sheesh, you’d think we lost the damn game by the sound of this article. the amount of negativity following this win is amazing.
The Cincinnati Bengals completed their ninth win of the season, ensuring them of their second winning season in the last 19 years
at this point i think i’m about to read something positive; something that makes me want to get excited for the PLAYOFFS.
but it’s been the team’s drawbacks that are now forced into the limelight.
“oh boy! a remote control airplane! thanks, santa!!! on second thought… i’m not even going to play with it. what’s the point? the batteries are going to die someday. it’s made out of cheap plastic and it will get ruined if i crash it. i might look like a dork if my friends see me having fun with it. i’ll probably get bored with it anyway… i guess this isn’t such a great toy after all. thanks for nothing, santa.”
horseshit…
by GrooveLeg on Dec 9, 2009 4:33 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa... Lois, this is not my Batman glass!
I’d say we’ll miss Coffman, but we have no idea what he’s capable of doing. At least the debate can officially, no more of these posts, move onto other things. I would agree that we need a spark, the only problem is the sparks are already on the field and there hasn’t been any ‘sparking’. Simpson is just not a good idea at this point, if we wanted to see what he had the last three games would have been the time to try him out. That chance has obviously come and gone, now we are left to put together a puzzle with a few missing pieces.
by 80%OFTHETIMEIMRIGHTEVERYTIME on Dec 9, 2009 4:52 PM EST up reply actions
lol i love that episode.
i’m talking more about the “we won, BUT” attitude that has been thrown around here the past few weeks. i’m just kinda tired of it. not half as tired as i am of the “Simpson / Coffman 2010” campaigning, but annoyed nonetheless.
am i the only one who sees a 9-3 season in the same light as a warehouse stuffed to the gills with all-you-can-eat ribs, beer, and naked chicks walking around with awesome rockin’ tits????
Okay, a couple of things.
First, let’s start out with the obligitory bit about the “thanks for reading and commenting” business.
Now, I agree with the all the complaints in the face of a great season. In my defense (you knew this was coming) this is the first piece I’ve written this season that was filled with concern. If you have read my other posts, you know that I’ve been an optimist who has encouraged readers to have fun with what’s happening, even if its not always pretty.
I wish the I would have had my post up sooner and the Coffman stuff would have been more relivant, but such is life. In saying that, are any of my areas of concerned unwarranted? I’m sorry if you feel the Coffman for ‘10 angle is a tired one; it’s obviously been put to rest for now.
I agree that Bengal fans haven’t enjoyed this season as much as they should. Watching your team win should be fun and all we ever wanted as fans was to see exactly that happen. but I’m starting to feel the concerns and I can’t write that I love the Bengals because they’re awesome every week, right?
Your airplane metaphor was funny.
B. Clifton Burke
just disregard that...
i was in a bad mood when i wrote it. i’ve cooled down now. you guys do a great job and i always enjoy your stuff, mojo.
it’s just frustrating when i hear the same stuff over and over again because it makes outsiders think we are bandwagon fans who can’t be happy with our record. the last thing i want our fanbase to resemble is that of boston teams who are never happy, even when they are on their way to the playoffs.
i am ecstatic that the coffman shit is over lol
I'm going to take a new spin on all of this.
I’m wondering at what point during all of this does carson or marvin sit all of these receivers down and say something like “WTF is going on with you people? Coles. Caldwell. Get your shit together god dammit I’m not going to let you or anyone else F this up! NUT UP!” Get out of here and send in the Tight Ends. #*$%!!!!"
I hope it’s sometime this week, if he hasn’t done so already.
Unfortunately
I think that scenario would have to be flipped, seeing as Carson appears to be the one missing the throws more than the receivers missing the ball. Don’t forget; a great QB can make an average receiver corps look great(see the pre-Moss/Welker Tom Brady). Whether he’s still scattered by thoughts of phantom legbreakers, there’s a hitch in his mechanics, the poor pass blocking has unnerved him, Brat’s play calling is too predictable, or a combination of all the above, Carson ain’t Carson. Not right now, he isn’t. For at least these next two games- and for any that we get in the postseason, HE needs to nut up, man up, however the hell you want to put it. The D, the run game, even the special teams are all pretty much in place. We’re waiting on you, Carson.
by IgnatiusJReilly on Dec 9, 2009 6:24 PM EST up reply actions
Carson has made some bad throws, yes.
All the more reason Marvin, Brat or Sheppherd need to sit those guys down and stress how UNACCEPTABLE dropping passes that hit them in the hands are.
Carson has looked skittish at times, and at other times he’s also put the ball in there better than he could stroll up and hand it to them.
It's not impossible to win the next two games the way the Bengals have been playing . . .
. . . but Mike Zimmer is going to have to pull one hell of a defensive gameplan out of some orifice.
The cool thing about the Bengals gameplan is that is repeatable, based on physicality rather than finesse and timing. As long as you got guys willing and able to bang, you can trot that plan out there, and most interesting is that there will be other teams just not used to dealing with that enough to compensate.
But what will set that plan into a tailspin is if there are mistakes that allow quick strike TDs, as both these opposing offenses are capable of doing. So the defense needs to be on lockdown. Can it? Gonna be hard. Against Minnesota, you figure the Bengals will stick with trying to contain the run and forcing the pass, which makes sense – they don’t want to give the TOP advantage of running to Minnesota. I think this is still possible, though not if they play the run like they played Smith from Detroit.
As for the passing game, I have serious doubts that the Bengals can get pressure with just the front 4, not without Peko. So they can’t run the gameplan that worked against Baltimore. So if they start dialing up pressure with more, someone’s gonna be free, and that will most likely be Shiancoe or the RB (Taylor on 3rd downs) over the middle. That’s basically what they did against Pittsburgh in Pittsburgh, and it worked ok, but was helped a lot by Ben throwing so much and so deep. When you factor that Minnesota’s offense is probably better overall than Pitt’s + we’re minus Peko, well, it’s gonna take serious execution and perhaps Minnesota needs to have a few miscues.
great post.
i agree—it’s going to be tough to get pressure on favre with just the line. fortunately, sidney rice and bernard berrian will not be getting open easily… leon hall has been a shutdown corner in every sense of the word, and JJ has been almost as good. we may have a few “coverage sacks”, and who knows—favre might finally have that game where he completely melts down and throws a bunch of picks. he hasn’t really had a horrible game yet this year and he also hasn’t played against a defense like ours.
I don't believe
Coffman is hurt. It’s a bogus way to stash a guy without having to waive him. At no other time this year did they mention this.
Cosby is a decent idea if you’re looking for a spark. The Smurfs weren’t too big either and they did well enough for the Redskins.
by occams_tiger_teeth on Dec 9, 2009 11:42 PM EST reply actions
There could be a conspiracy involving Coffman
Or it took thirteen weeks for our crack medical staff to figure out that Coffman was hurting. Either one is believable at this point, especially considering how our medical staff has performed in the past.
by Danimal, Destroyer of Worlds on Dec 9, 2009 11:56 PM EST up reply actions
Nonsense
I think Carson will be the first to tell you that overshooting a receiver on 3rd and 6, then handing it over to the defense isn’t by design. The “defense first” mantra is a convenient cop out for a field goal kicking team like the Bengals. Eventually, the defense isn’t there to bail you out and you have a serious problem when you can’t convert 3rd downs or get 6 in the red zone.
(See: Denver, Houston, Oakland, every big game OSU has played since 2006)
They need to run more no huddle… Palmer looks great when they do.
by kirby28 on Dec 10, 2009 9:11 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
The run focused game plan
has been letting us control the clock. We’ve been getting 10-20 more plays and an extra series each half (tossing out any “hail mary” or kneel series as time runs out).
That has really helped keep the defense fresh.

by 


















