Surprise!!! Housh Wants No Part of Tagging
In one of the most shocking acknowledgments ever, the Bengals receiver everybody seems to covet wants no part of any "franchise tag" plans Cincinnati may or may not have for him, according to Sheil Kapadia at PFT.
"I don’t want any part of the tag," [T.J.] told the Dayton Daily News. "The more I think about, I don’t think I’ll be franchised. It’s a lot of money. If you franchise somebody what are you saying about the player? Obviously, you think he is that type of player, and if you think he’s that type of player then you’re franchising him."
Since it looks like a long term extension is out of the question -- making the resigning of Chris Henry all the more understandable (sarcasm alert) -- the writing on the wall says T.J. won't be catching balls in the Jungle next season ... unless his new team has an away game in Cincinnati.
With all these receiver questions starting to rear their ugly head (T.J.'s situation and Drew "I Won't Every Shut Up" Rosenhaus indicating he's shopping every receiver in his stable), does it change the Bengals' draft strategy in April? What about their approach to free agency? Obviously, addressing the offensive line is tantamount, but if Carson Palmer doesn't have anyone to throw it to, all the pocket time in the world won't make much difference.
0 recs |
7 comments
Comments
see this kinda ticks me off. If i were Mike Brown, i’d tag him anyway and let him be pissed at the organization, who cares? Chad did it all last season and he got over it. With the Bengals schedule seemingly softer then last years (very winable games Oakland, Denver, Chiefs, Jets, Packers, Bears, Lions, Vikes, Texans) and we atleast pick up 2 wins against the division heck we got a formula for something here. With Carson slinging him the ball I don’t understand why he wouldn’t want to play here? Oh so he wants JT O’Sullivan or whoever the f*** starts in San Fran throwing it to him deep, good luck. That’s what ticks me off the most about this TJ wants out business, why? The three or four places listed he wants to go (Seattle, San Fran, Eagles and Bears), three of them I’d consider less skilled then the Bengals and heck two of them don’t even have a starting QB. So basically he wants money but he wont let himself be seen as a greedy son-of-a-b@#$%. So he doesn’t want to be a possession receiver, he doesn’t have to. he caught so many balls because Ryan Fitzpatrick either scrambled or fumbled and couldn’t throw the pigskin further then 20 yards with any accuracy, clearly Housh was Fitz’s check down. With Carson he has the chance to go deep more often. Stop being a baby and suck it up, you criticized CJ all last year for being a poor sport suck it up and take the tag and quit whining, heck you might have a chance to do something against some of the lower ranked defenses with a healthy top 5 qb, unless you take the alternative of a qb shuffle in SF and Chi. Just nonsense and it clearly shows TJ is a whimp and wants to get paid, which I have nothing wrong with. But don’t be a hypocrit and then try and justify it because you think the Bengals are lousy, come on man
"yeah so basically you got a qb with a bum elbow and ocho who is half spanish half retarded and thats it on offense eh"
- Wally, Best Friend/Giants Fan
by Ocho85 on Feb 12, 2009 2:07 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Conversely
I see TJ’s POV as well. Brown won’t give him a much-deserved extension, so why wouldn’t Housh bristle at the idea of being tagged. Sure, he’d get a nice one-year chunk of change, but NFL players want those huge signing bonuses. They aren’t as concerned with weekly paychecks. However, I think his animosity towards the ownership has more to do with his perception of being slighted instead of simple greed.
by IFChris on Feb 12, 2009 3:00 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Okay sure, he’s played his guts out to deserve an extension, but if he is unwilling to budge and must use the media as a means to get his sentiment heard I don’t quite see the logic. He is only further alienating himself as a stuck up greedy wide-receiver like Ocho was last year. It’s all fine and dandy he wants the huge signing bonus but how is he furthering his career by playing for teams that I don’t see as contenders (Bears, Seahawks & Niners). Take the tag, see what happens next year with a healthy Carson Palmer, a healthy Chad Johnson and possibly a run-game against several opponents I think we have a legitimate shot at beating because our defense can only improve. Everyone knows Brown’s stance on dolling out money, it isn’t going to happen, especially for a Number 2 receiver who is 32 years old, the only team dumb enough to sign him for more than 2 years is the Raiders
"yeah so basically you got a qb with a bum elbow and ocho who is half spanish half retarded and thats it on offense eh"
- Wally, Best Friend/Giants Fan
by Ocho85 on Feb 12, 2009 3:53 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Let him go
What’s so bad about a receiving core of Johnson, Henry, Cadwell and Simpson (plus Utecht). I think most teams would be pretty happy with this. Let TJ go (he doesn’t want to be here) and sign players who do (Benson, Crocker). The Bengals need to focus on their o-line. A good line and healthy #9 will make this team look much better than a slot receiver. We need to draft o-line rounds 1 and 2 (tackle, center) and then keep building the defense with the rest of the draft. This is what will make the team better, not signing a 32 year old receiver.
by Detroit Bengal on Feb 12, 2009 6:35 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I agree
unless we can trade 8 5, we can’t afford to keep TJ given the many other weakness the team has.
Take whatever the money it would cost to franchise him and go get the best O-lineman we can.
I’d much rather take a chance an Caldwell than on Ghiaciuc, Levi, Andrews, or Perry
by R.F. Mehl on Feb 12, 2009 8:58 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The only problem with it is that Caldwell and Simpson combined for 12 catches in there career for 80 yards. Utecht is injury-prone and unproven and we don’t use the TE enough in the pass game, his main purpose is to run-block and Coats is a better blocker then Utecht anyways. Johnson, okay but Henry? really? we cut the guy and had to bring him back for christ sake, what was wrong with him cut ha. I just see a massive hole at WR without TJ its just unproven and adds another position we have to focus on. With him signed it looks alot more threatening
"yeah so basically you got a qb with a bum elbow and ocho who is half spanish half retarded and thats it on offense eh"
- Wally, Best Friend/Giants Fan
by Ocho85 on Feb 13, 2009 10:08 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
RE
“The only problem with it is that Caldwell and Simpson combined for 12 catches in there career for 80 yards”
While I think this is a legit point, I don’t think it’s indicative to their potential. Truth is, the Bengals ran a lot of three wide sets, but also double-TE and two-WR sets, and all that jazz. With Chad Johnson and T.J. and Henry, Caldwell and Simpson just didn’t have the opp. for playing time.
And yes, I said the evil word potential. But no matter we do from here on out, we’re going to have to bank on potential and the ability to develop scouting reports to rebuild our WR position. So why not with Caldwell and Simpson?
Blogger at CincyJungle.com -- SB Nation Cincinnati Bengals blog.
by Kirkendall on Feb 13, 2009 7:08 PM EST reply actions 0 recs

by 


















