Detroit Lions could affect the Bengals first-round selection
Of all the teams that could dramatically effect the Cincinnati Bengals drafting plans, it's the Detroit Lions. Will they go quarterback? Offensive tackle? Even though they acquired Julian Peterson, is linebacker still on the table? Tom Kowalski of Mlive.com writes:
Aaron Curry could probably be a tremendous middle linebacker and I'm sure the Detroit Lions are going to let everyone know that as the draft approaches, but I'm more and more convinced that the Lions are going to draft a left tackle. It's going to be Baylor's Jason Smith or Virginia's Eugene Monroe and the selection between those two will most likely be based on the contract negotiations leading up to the draft.
If the Lions go offensive tackle, that leaves three of the top tackle prospects. One of which is being taken off boards for his (lack of) work ethic.
So, Matthew Stafford? Latest word is that the Lions appear interested in woe-is-me Jay Cutler trade possibilities, that is if Cutler is indeed on the trading block. Which he has been, but not really, kind of sorta, though he says so twice. If the Lions look at quarterback in the draft, it gives the Bengals flexibility, while other teams like the Rams and Seahawks are potential offensive linemen candidates as well.
Either way, the Bengals could be looking at definitely the second best tackle in the draft, probably the third best tackle in the draft and (somewhat) possibly the fourth tackle in the draft. But that all depends on the Lions. Worst case scenario, Jason Smith, Eugene Monroe and Michael Oher could be gone by the time the Bengals pick. Then what? Yea, you're not so sure about that Andre Smith guy, are you? If that's the case, defense?
5 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
if they go i see maclin or moreno
by cinbengal_85@yahoo.com on Mar 16, 2009 7:37 PM EDT reply actions
Why all the Crabtree and Maclin talk?
Is this confusing anyone else? We all ready have the deepest WR core in the division by far. It would only make sense if we trade Chad which i don’t even want to do unless we use the pick(s) to draft O line or a D play maker
Bengals draft
Who cares. The disfunctional ownership cares only about one thing. Putting the most money in their pockets. Who can they sign the cheapest,so us “minions” THINK they really are trying to get to the big show, when in fact going to the big show would COST them money, so it really has never been part of the business plan….Mikie boy laughs all the way to the bank.
truly, Who Don’t…… Sunday afternoon soccer ith the kids and grandkids is much more enjoyable than sharing it with a bunch of drunken bums parked around the stadium on Sundays.
easier said than done... but trade back?
If they take andre smith, we have about No chance of getting Eugene Monroe.
We really need to field offers for trading back. hopefully into the 11-16 area. then i would have no problem taking michael Oher or andre Smith.
Andre Smith. I think I might rather have Meredith, Beatty, Britton, or Tupou than Andre Smith anywhere in the first three rounds of this draft. He may indeed have the most raw talent and potential in this class, he may even end up a perennial Pro-Bowl selection, but I’d say it’s even money he’s a total headcase who may never make an NFL roster.
Boy, Jay Cutler has turned out to be a real whiner, hasn’t he? You’d think a Vandy guy could grasp the business of football, could grasp how Shanahan’s Golden Boy loses that luster when Shanahan is shown the door, could grasp how new management is often inclined to clean house on arrival, and could grasp that threats of “trade me!” are empty when the other side doesn’t believe in you like it once did. Grow up, Jay.
I don’t see any scenario where Oher is also off the board at 6. J. Smith and Monroe, sure. I can even see us drafting Oher there- and I’m working my way around to being alright with that.
by IgnatiusJReilly on Mar 17, 2009 12:52 PM EDT reply actions

by 


























