Lewis airing disappointment in Stacy Andrews; not paying $80 million for no Pro Bowls, a few draft picks, seems right

+ What's Marvin Lewis' point when airing his displeasure after Stacy Andrews' departure? However, we slightly disagree with Joe Reedy's assessment that "Andrews and Moran did give the Bengals their opportunity". In my opinion, I never really felt that Andrews wanted to remain -- and if there's a pinch of truth to what Marvin Lewis says, then Andrews kept every deal on the table until a better one came along. You can say that that the Bengals are notoriously cheap, and underpay their players, and there's mountains of truth behind that. However, I'm just not certain that's completely Cincinnati's fault, especially for a player that eventually signed to play with his brother -- which figured to be his plan all along.

+ Mike Florio rips the Bengals for touting their four compensatory picks, saying that the Bengals are being rewarded for being too cheap for not paying departing free agents.

For starters, the only reason that they have compensatory picks is because they choose not to pay the draft picks and veterans who have performed well for them, and likewise to spend limited amounts on other peoples’ free agents. Indeed, this year’s crop of four compensatory picks (a third-rounder, a sixth-rounder, and two in the seventh) comes from the fact that the Bengals lost via free agency in 2008 the following players: Landon Johnson, Bryan Robinson, Justin Smith, Alex Stepanovich, and Madieu Williams.

The Bengals replaced that five-man exodus by signing only Antwan Odom.

So, in this case, cheapness equals more draft picks.

Dave says that Florio swings and misses while WDR praises Florio, for calling out the Bengals.

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, so I'm not going to dissect that. Historically speaking, Florio and WDR are more justified in their points than not. Based only on 2008, I don't agree. First of all, if we signed Madieu Williams and Justin Smith to contracts that they signed with the Vikings and 49ers respectively, then the Bengals would have had to spend $78.75 million, with $33 million guaranteed -- both signed six-year contracts. I could be in the minority, but that's two-sack super-star Justin Smith and Madieu Williams, who was good, but hardly irreplaceable with durability concerns even in Cincinnati.

The question that I want answered is: How many total Pro Bowls were earned, in their career, between Williams and Smith? None. That's no Pro Bowl players for $78.75 million that we could have spent, but didn't, and received draft picks instead.

X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

Join Cincy Jungle

You must be a member of Cincy Jungle to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Cincy Jungle. You should read them.

Join Cincy Jungle

You must be a member of Cincy Jungle to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Cincy Jungle. You should read them.

Spinner

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.

tracking_pixel_9341_tracker