Carucci lists five top trades to watch; one of them is Chad Johnson
Since we haven't spoken of Chad Johnson for a galactic minute, I thought it was fine time to do so; otherwise I'd be giving off the impression that Chad Johnson trade rumors aren't to be taken seriously (laugh, please). In his latest, Vic Carucci lists five potential trades "to watch before the draft". The first three are Braylon Edwards, Jason Peters and Julius Peppers. The fifth is Anquan Boldin, where head coach Ken Wisenhunt said "It would be foolish from out standpoint not to listen to those opportunities and see what actually exists." Only if Mike Brown could say that, if anything, to keep channels open.
Ochocinco still wants out of Cincinnati as much as ever, but isn't voicing it in public the way he did last year. He likely would have fetched a fairly high trade price a year ago from a team such as the Washington Redskins, who wound up addressing wide receiver in the draft.
Now, the market seems far cooler. The Eagles and Giants are looking for a receiver, but after their ugly experiences with Terrell Owens and Burress, respectively, neither seems inclined to take on the excess drama baggage that comes with the receiver formerly known as Chad Johnson.
Let's quickly reemphasize my position, so my point of view isn't taken out of context. If Chad Johnson comes into 2009 with something to prove to himself, the NFL and the Bengals, I'm on board. Keep him. His A-game is so much better than most receivers' A-games. Anything less, trade him. It's simple, really. Chad Johnson is known to be desperately hoping to leave Cincinnati. This brings motivation into question, and the effort in the games is thus questioned. Therefore, if he's not giving it all, then would Palmer trust him on third down. Would he look to Coles, or Henry -- who we assume is being groomed as Palmer's next favorite target. Really? Palmer has always stuck up for Henry, thrown to him without caution and raves about his talents.
No, I don't know Johnson, nor do I know his state of mind. The coaches and front office should -- if he wasn't off somewhere isolating himself from the franchise. I cautiously write all of this based on assumption and conjecture and could be equally wrong if Johnson has something to prove to himself, the other 31 NFL teams and the Bengals. The problem is no one (reportedly) knows Johnson's motivations, even though Lewis claims to talk to him. So the question is now whether he'll come to play all-out, or simply feel sorry for himself for not getting what he wants. Should we continue playing this wait and see game?
Quick note: The Cardinals are looking for a first and a third-round pick for Anquan Boldin. That's the same asking price, reportedly, that the Bengals are demanding for Chad Johnson.
6 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Trade Chad.
Trade Chad and a third round pick this year for a first round this year and a second round next year. We have a third to give up and could help ourselves with an extra pick next year. That would make our offer more enticing then the Boulton offer.
They would loose a first this year but gain Chad and a third round pick plus only loose a second next year.
I’d settle for a high to mid-second and either a fourth this year or a second or third next year for Chad. I’d also settle for the Giants’ 29 or the Eagles’ 28 straight up and maybe throw in Levi Jones for good measure.
by IgnatiusJReilly on Apr 16, 2009 7:08 PM EDT reply actions
If New England only got a second rounder for Cassel and Vrable, we are out of our minds to want a first and third. I think a second rounder or even a very high third would work if they truley want to move on. But with FA’s like Holt and Harrison still walking the street and younger WR’s like Bolden and Edwards on the trading block, it just may be to hard to move him.
by smoormandiddy on Apr 16, 2009 8:43 PM EDT up reply actions
Cassel
was signed as a free agent. Vrabel was the trade- just happened on two consecutive days.
by IgnatiusJReilly on Apr 16, 2009 10:04 PM EDT up reply actions
no your mistaken iggy, Cassel was franchised by the Pats and traded to the chiefs for a 2nd round pick and a player to be named. it ended up being Vrable
by Joe Goodberry on Apr 17, 2009 10:54 AM EDT up reply actions
I don't think they will get back..
….what they would have last year from the Redskins (a first and a conditional first).Now a 2nd and a 3rd, and I say go for it.
Envy our past......Fear our future

by 
























