How are others reacting to the Bengals selections; a couple of quotes
It's not often that the Cincinnati Bengals receive favorable national attention. Admittedly, often the attention they've received in the past is well-deserved. John Clayton is shocked, SHOCKED I TELL YOU, about the Bengals draft.
What's going on with the Bengals? Cincinnati's Day 2 drafting was as solid as its Day 1 selections. There were no reaches, no controversies and even a nice story. The Bengals earned good grades for first-day selections Andre Smith and Rey Maualuga. On the second day, they left themselves without much criticism after taking defensive end Michael Johnson, tight end Chase Coffman and center Jonathan Luigs, who might start. The good story was taking University of Cincinnati punter Kevin Huber, who learned of the selection while golfing. The secret to their success was the Senior Bowl; the Bengals coached four of their draft choices in that game.
On the other hand, James Walker thrives on his opinion that the Bengals are still on the terrorist watch-list implemented in 2006 by Roger Goodell.
The Bengals continued their trend of taking risks high in the draft, starting in the first round with Smith.
Without a doubt, the Alabama left tackle was one of the best players in the country during the college season. He has tremendous talent. But a suspension before the Crimson Tide's Sugar Bowl game, a poor NFL combine and not-so-great pro day led to questions about his work ethic and decision-making. The Bengals will invest a lot of guaranteed money in Smith, which raises even more questions. Add the fact that Virginia left tackle Eugene Monroe, a much safer pick, was still available at No. 6 and that will add a lot of pressure for Cincinnati's selection of Smith to pan out well.
Cincinnati also took another player with somewhat similar issues in Georgia Tech defensive end Michael Johnson in the third round. He has tremendous first-day ability, but apparently every NFL team feels he has second-day motivation. Again, it will be up to the coaches to get the best out of Johnson at all times.
This is the ultimate boom or bust draft for the Bengals. They probably drafted more pure, athletic talent than any team in the division, which could turn out to be all that matters. But players like Smith and Johnson will need to be constantly monitored, and there has to be some reason every team passed on USC linebacker Rey Maualuga as well. Perhaps many general managers felt he was overrated, which remains to be seen.
Overall, these draft picks have the potential to either lead to Cincinnati's resurgence or add to its recurring problems.
We could go into the fact that Walker has never looked favorable to Andre Smith and I can't recall an article in which Walker actually just talks about Smith's play on the field. Thus he thrives on making the Bengals much more controversial than they really are. The fact he allows that the Bengals drafted the most "athletic talent" and could lead to "Cincinnati's resurgence" is shocking.
Walker then questioned if the Bengals waited too long for a center.
Adam Caplan says that Rey Maualuga is one of the best value picks in the draft.
The fact that he dropped so far might be due in part that scouts saw him as a two-down linebacker. This was a common complaint in regard to high-touted LBs such as Dan Connor and Paul Posluszny in recent drafts and why they fell farther than expected . However, a source notes Posluszny wound up playing in over 97 percent of the defensive snaps last season for the Buffalo Bills.
Maualuga will bring a certain level of badly needed physicality to the Bengal defense next season.
Then Cedric Golden went on to simply point out the Bengals selections
Much maligned Cincinnati brass men Mike Brown and Marvin Lewis have taken plenty of criticism for bringing in players with character issues, but the Bengal nation lauded them for promising to clean up that locker room.
So what did the new-look Bengals do with their first two picks? They took Alabama offensive tackle Andre Smith in the first round, then selected Southern Cal linebacker Rey Maualuga in the second.
Tide coach Nick Saban suspended Smith for the Sugar Bowl for improper contact with an agent, then the kid showed up out of shape for the NFL rookie combine and didn't work out. Then he left.
Maualuga was arrested in college on suspicion of battery, and USC coach Pete Carroll benched him one game for his conduct at a party. YouTube viewers have seen his clip, co-starring unsuspecting ESPN reporter Erin Andrews.
Who knows? Maybe the two will each play for 10 years and make All-Pro teams, but you would think the Bengals brain trust would be trying to steer clear of players who have checkered pasts.
Golden's arguments are weak. Very weak. And he uses Maualuga's mini-grinding session with ESPN's Erin Andrews as an example. Note to Cedric Golden: Andrews is hot. Your arguments against both of these players are not.
Chick Ludwig says that Michael Johnson is a steal, happily waves good bye to Kyle Larson, and grades the team's first seven picks with an "A+", saying the Bengals are headed in the right direction.
Joe Reedy says that this draft has the chance to be one of Marvin Lewis' best. Reedy also grades the Bengals with the best draft in the AFC North. Good man.
Defensive tackle Clinton McDonald struggled waiting through the second day.
"When the clock was counting down for the Bengals (to pick), that's when I got the call from coach (Lewis) and he said, `Are you ready to be a Bengal?' '' McDonald said. "I said `Yes, sir.' It was a hard wait.''
Arkansas head coach Bobby Petrino on center Jonathan Luigs:
"Jonathan will play a long time on the next level," Arkansas head coach Bobby Petrino said. "He is flexible enough to stay healthy. He is very, very smart. He will know what to do and will immediately pick up the offense. He has the physical tools to do it."
“I thought I’d be gone on Saturday, but you play the cards you’re dealt,” Johnson said by phone from his home in Selma, Ala. “I look forward to going in there and proving myself. I’m going to go earn my money.”
“The negatives, to me, any complain that anyone might have is what I’m going to focus on more now until it becomes a strength,” Johnson said. “I look forward to the opportunity and I’m ready. I’m so ready.”
On playing with Eric Henderson:
“I’m looking forward to going up there and learning from him the same way I did when I came to Tech.”
0 recs |
9 comments
|
Comments
What did McShay say?
Insider only beyond the AFC East.. go figure, more favoritism to the Pats and Jets. Damn ESPN.
by jsl413 on Apr 27, 2009 3:12 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
McShay:
Best pick: ILB Rey Maualuga, USC (Second round, No. 38 overall)
Worst pick: RB Bernard Scott, Abilene Christian (Sixth round, No. 209 overall)
Bottom line: The only issue I have with this draft is that the Bengals continue to put themselves in jeopardy from a character standpoint. While the immaturity of OT Andre Smith and past off-the-field incidents for Maualuga can be overlooked, why on earth would Cincinnati draft Scott in the sixth round? He has bounced around to four different colleges and has reportedly been arrested at least five times since high school. Still, you could make an argument that this is the best top-to-bottom group in the draft. Smith could solidify the offensive line, while Maualuga and DE Michael Johnson could thrive under the tutelage of head coach Marvin Lewis. If Maualuga can become more consistent and Johnson can be motivated to reach his considerable potential they will become very good NFL players. Other great values include TE Chase Coffman in the third round and C Jonathan Luigs in the fourth, both of whom should become starters in the next few years.
by R.F. Mehl on Apr 27, 2009 7:52 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Here’s the deal: The Bengals don’t win. They’re in a small market. Not worth the heavy digging for most journalists. Even James Walker has better things to do with the AFC North Blog. Lazy, but I can’t blame them. Until the Bengals make themselves relevant(win/not be the most poorly run franchise in sports), journalists will take whatever they do at face value. Be realistic.
by bodacio on Apr 27, 2009 7:37 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Yellow Journalism
A lot of these guys just have a negative opinion of the Bengals to start with and nothing we do will change their bias. Go ahead, rain on our parade pundits, many of whom are journalistic idiots who are no judge of football talent. You can’t draft a choir boy every time. We got some fantastic athletes while addressing our needs. No matter what any talking head says, this was a GREAT draft. Gentlemen, we may have turned the corner.
by laibach on Apr 27, 2009 8:51 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Only questionable pick is Bernard Scott
Dude is on the Pacman Jones/Chris Henry path. Other than that, I have no problems with any of the other picks.
Envy our past......Fear our future
by btcoop71 on Apr 27, 2009 10:00 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
It’s funny. I remember a time on here where we argued about whether to take an Andre Smith or a Rey Maulauga with our first pick- or trading Chad to get both. A little earlier in the draft season and Michael Johnson was in that discussion as well. To get all three without giving anything away is, frankly, astounding, though I attribute it more to pure luck than to any skill on the part of our war room.
I’d like to trust Marvin et al when they say that Cook and/or Santucci are fine center prospects and I’d like to think the addition of Jonathan Luigs will finish off any worries about that position. But I don’t…and it hasn’t thus far.
I’ve seen a lot of Chase Coffman at Missouri and I think he’s dynamite but, then, what on earth was Utecht for?
Unlike News5’s sputtering George Vogel last night, I’m not instantly irate about taking Bernard Scott, at least, not for the reasons that had him apoplectic. It’s just that, with a handful of much higher-rated backs available- Rashad Jennings, Ian Johnson, Kory Sheets, etc., where did they come up with Bernard Scott? Was he, minus the character baggage, on their board higher than the previously mentioned candidates? And, though I could personally care less what the national media thinks of us, I understand that their perception- fact-based or otherwise, has a real impact on our ability to, for instance, draw top talent here in free agency. Just how tone deaf- in a public relations sense, do we have to be to make that Bernard Scott selection? I watched the tape. I think he’s got some serious skills. I hope he’s put his past behind him and moved on. I give him the benefit of the doubt that he has. His selction, though, is still a serious facepalm moment.
Also, as much as I get that we need a good punter and as much as I know that Huber is the best of the best- with the added bonus of being a McNick/UC homeboy and the good press that generates, I can’t endorse his selection. Not with Duke Robinson, Tupuo, and Herman Johnson still on the board. A potential starter on the offensive line, a guy who plays three downs versus a punter who plays on one? Come on. Punters should be culled from waiver wires, undrafted free agents, and training camp invitees.
by IgnatiusJReilly on Apr 27, 2009 10:38 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Remember ?
We could have had at least one of that trio after Huber was selected so don’t blame him. I think you may be understating the value of a really good punter, and I personally like the pick. Maybe we can score on every series this year and we won’ t need a punter…..LOL….I wish !
by laibach on Apr 27, 2009 4:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
punter
Huber will make teams start alot deeper on their own side of the field. That will help our shining defence shine brighter yet. Yes, I love Herman Johnson, (6’7" 355lbs), but the nfl did not! 6 guards were chosen before him, (not counting the center-to-guard guys), with the choosers paychecks on the line their choices seem odd to us sometimes but they see the players quickness and most of the time all we see is numbers (size).
Huber will not lower taxes but he gets my vote (“endorsement”). If he punts anything like he did in college, (WHICH HE WILL), I will be grinning (instead of biting my nails), when the bengals punt the ball. ; – ) yaaaaaaaaa!!!!!!!
With picks 1 through 6, I found myself saying YES out LOUD ! ! ! ! ! and Huber’s YES was just a little louder than Maualuga’s YES for some reason?
I loved the bengals draft. And the national media (rating the Jets draft with a higher grade?) what a joke.
They got a good
GO BENGALLLLLLLLLLLLSSSSSSSSSSSS YEAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH.
by brewbengal on May 23, 2009 10:19 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
ESPN link
Here is a link to ESPN.com’s consensus grades. It is a quick read. Bengals grade out favorably, except for USA Today…. but don’t fret, it is only because ESPN linked to USA Today’s 2008 draft grade for the Bengals.
by NYCwhoDEY on Apr 27, 2009 3:34 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 

















