How are the National Media Grading the NFL Draft?

Rather than personally grading everything with arbitrary unweighted letters about our team, I figure it was now time to point out the grades, or reactions, on how the Bengals did in the eyes of more mainstream national guys. Yea, I know you don't care. But there has to be some fascination on people's perceptions of us. Right? Anyway, if I reacted to everything, then, well, I'd have to take off from work for the next week. After providing the first one, I'm going to force you to work by moving finger over left mouse button and firmly, yet gently, pressing down on "Continue Reading this post".
The Bengals had a lot of picks and they did a good job getting good quality with their quantity. Andre Smith, Rey Maualuga and Michael Johnson are great ways to start a draft for any team. These guys could fill big holes for the Bengals. The fourth-round selection of offensive lineman Jonathan Luigs was a little high, but it wasn't crazy. The late-round picks weren't anything to write home about, but they did a good job of getting strength in numbers and getting some depth for their team.
Best pick: ILB Rey Maualuga, USC (second round, No. 38 overall)
Worst pick: RB Bernard Scott, Abilene Christian (sixth round, No. 209 overall)
Bottom line: The only issue I have with this draft is that the Bengals continue to put themselves in jeopardy from a character standpoint. While the immaturity of OT Andre Smith and past off-the-field incidents for Maualuga can be overlooked, why on earth would Cincinnati draft Scott in the sixth round? He has bounced around to four different colleges and has reportedly been arrested at least five times since high school. Still, you could make an argument that this is the best top-to-bottom group in the draft. Smith could solidify the offensive line, while Maualuga and DE Michael Johnson could thrive under the tutelage of head coach Marvin Lewis. If Maualuga can become more consistent and Johnson can be motivated to reach his considerable potential, they will become very good NFL players. Other great values include TE Chase Coffman in the third round and C Jonathan Luigs in the fourth, both of whom should become starters in the next few years.
I want to be careful about this, because I don't want to paint the individuals listed below as bad people, because I certainly don't think that's true. Everyone's got their flaws, and the fact that these guys have overcome them to accomplish as much as they have in football says a lot of them, too.
But from the standpoint of the Cincinnati Bengals, with all the issues with character that they've had on their football team ... wouldn't you like to see more quotes in here like, "great motor, loves playing football, works hard on and off the field, never takes a play off, a tremendous natural leader, and stays out of trouble off the field"?
They recant that later.
This has a chance to be one of the best drafts in Bengals history, especially if Alabama offensive tackle Andre Smith and USC middle linebacker Rey Maualuga develop into All-Pro performers. Both have the ability to be great NFL players. Maualuga slid into the second round because of off-the-field issues, plus the fact that he didn't call the defense at USC despite being a middle linebacker. But Maualuga is an upbeat, physical player who can lead in the locker room. Smith's bad body got him in trouble with some teams, but he weighed in at 333 pounds this week, plus Alabama head coach Nick Saban totally supported his status as a high pick.
Missouri TE Chase Coffman, 6-5, broke his foot in the Alamo Bowl game vs. Northwestern, but he has a pro pedigree, being the son of former Packers tight end Paul Coffman. Georgia Tech pass rusher Michael Johnson has great physical skills although many scouts thought he took many plays off on Saturdays. A local kid, Cincinnati punter Kevin Huber, won the Ray Guy Award as the nation's best punter last season. Grade: A
Cincinnati. Hard to knock this draft. Impossible, quite frankly. Might be the most starry top four since Hunley-Koch-Blados-Esiason of 1984. Andre Smith is a potential star left tackle who needs coaching and someone to lean on him ... Maualuga is the best tackler in the draft and shouldn't have been there when the Bengals picked at 38 ... Michael Johnson, as inconsistent a player as this draft featured, is a pass-rush-prospect steal at 70 ... Chase Coffman could play early as a second TE for Carson Palmer. Nice day for the Bengals.
Positives: Smith, Maualuga and Johnson have plenty of talent.
Negatives: Attitude and work ethic issues with both Smith and Johnson.
Bottom line: B-. As usual, the Bengals got the best players at whatever spot they drafted. Andre Smith was arguably the best left tackle in the draft before his stock fell after leaving the scouting combine without telling anybody in February and then being out of shape for his pro day workout. Maualuga is a terrific pickup in the second round, arguably the best inside linebacker in the draft and continues to upgrade the Bengals linebacking corps after getting Keith Rivers last year. Likewise, Johnson is a tremendously gifted athlete as an edge rusher with his height and reach, but his work ethic has been questioned. The Bengals simply don’t factor in character when they pick, making their choices almost always boom-or-bust propositions.
For a team known through the years for its penchant of making some dubious choices early in the draft -- see Frostee Rucker, Odell Thurman, and Chris Perry -- the Bengals impressed me in 2009. Offensive tackle Andre Smith in the first round, middle linebacker Rey Maualuga in the second round, and defensive end Michael Johnson in the third round strike me as great value in just the right draft slots.
B. OT Andre Smith carries some question marks but he is a superior blocker and got great references from Alabama coach Nick Saban. Conditioning and weight will always be questions. LB Rey Maualuga slipped into second round, should bring some toughness to the middle of a leaky run defense. He's a hitter. Some saw DE Michael Johnson as a first-round talent and Bengals got him in third. Edge rusher. TE Chase Coffman is a steal in the third.
John Clayton after the first day:
Bengals owner Mike Brown would rather draft a top offensive lineman than a skill-position player. In 2002, Brown drafted left tackle Levi Brown instead of tight end Jeremy Shockey in the first round. So it shouldn't have been a surprise to see the Bengals take offensive tackle Andre Smith over wide receiver Michael Crabtree, despite Cincinnati's need at receiver after the loss of T.J. Houshmandzadeh in free agency.
John Clayton after the second day:
What's going on with the Bengals? Cincinnati's Day 2 drafting was as solid as its Day 1 selections. There were no reaches, no controversies and even a nice story. The Bengals earned good grades for first-day selections Andre Smith and Rey Maualuga. On the second day, they left themselves without much criticism after taking defensive end Michael Johnson, tight end Chase Coffman and center Jonathan Luigs, who might start. The good story was taking University of Cincinnati punter Kevin Huber, who learned of the selection while golfing. The secret to their success was the Senior Bowl; the Bengals coached four of their draft choices in that game.
Clark Judge speaks to Kevin Huber directly: "I'd bring a lot of ice for that leg, Kevin. You're going to need it."
0 recs |
17 comments
|
Comments
Huber's gonna be riding the pine all year
Palmer to Coffman on 3rd and 8 is going to make Brat’s run-run-pass-punt become a 3-play process.
by jsl413 on Apr 27, 2009 5:35 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
who cares
they will probably down grade us because we’re Cincy
by cincyboy on Apr 27, 2009 5:56 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Peter King...
saying something positive about the Bengals. Bizzaro World. I like how Clayton did not realize that if Palmer does not have time to throw, then he wont need a WR but a Room at the hospital.
by ToledoRocket on Apr 27, 2009 7:15 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
He ought to already own one with the money he (or the team) has spent there.
Hopefully, however, he won’t need it for a few years now.
by FriarBob on Apr 27, 2009 8:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I love the "character issues" of the Bernard Scott
Don’t get me wrong, the guy clearly has trouble with authority and severe immaturity problems, but let’s examine Shutdown Corner’s case:
“He was kicked off his high school team at Vernon because of an off-campus fight after his junior season. He also was dismissed from the Central Arkansas University team for hitting a coach, along with a few other issues. He’s also been arrested for some traffic-related misdemeanors, and he’s currently finishing out an 18-month probation for failing to identify himself during a traffic stop in Abilene in the spring of 2007.”
Let’s see, fighting, hitting a coach, and traffic related misdemeanors… The only thing I see that most high school/college young men can’t be accused of is hitting a coach. Moreover, I’ve never been a young black man in central Arkansas; methinks there might be some issues with African American youth and the law in that region that may explain – not justify – the situation. Furthermore, if you really, really immature and you’re stopped by a police officer with several “traffic related misdemeanors” on your record, I could imagine a logical choice (though stupid to the rest of us) would be to not identify yourself to the officer for fear of getting in further trouble. Rather than being a terrible person, it seems to me that Scott just doesn’t get the adage “when you are in a hole, the first step is to stop digging.”
It’s not like he was accused of dealing drugs (Jamal Lewis, Ravens/Browns, convicted), Murder (Ray Lewis, Ravens, pled guilty to obstruction of justice), repeated drunk driving (BJ Sams, Ravens), steroid use (Shawne Merriman, et al.), or spousal abuse (James Harrison, girlfriend chose “not to press charges,” though noone denies he kicked a door in and ripped a phone off the wall). Point being: there are much larger thugs in the NFL than Bernard Scott, this kneejerk reaction against the Bengals needs to stop.
"Ryan, Things in here don't react too well to bullets." - Marko Ramius
by TarZander on Apr 27, 2009 8:26 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
But if they stopped beating up on the Bengals they’d actually have to work (for a change) to find something to write about!
by FriarBob on Apr 27, 2009 8:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Let me clarify...
Reading my post again, I think I was not clear enough. I think that the police in places like Central Arkansas are racists and target young black men unfairly. I did NOT/NOT mean to say that young black men are more likely to get arrested because of who they are.
"Ryan, Things in here don't react too well to bullets." - Marko Ramius
by TarZander on Apr 27, 2009 10:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh you were plenty clear. I just decided not to comment on your stereotyping at first. But you’re quite wrong. At least as far as the sweeping generalization you made. There are always a few bad apples in any bunch, but the cops down there aren’t the racist hillbillies you seem to think of them as.
by FriarBob on Apr 28, 2009 9:35 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Point taken.
Maybe I am a little too unfair to “Arkansas’ Finest” in my post – I was impolitic in the clarification and I apologize. The fact remains, however, that 4 out of his 5 arrests were dropped. I don’t know the facts surrounding all of them, so I will leave it at that. This does bring to mind, however, what happened to Mattias Askew a few years back when “a few bad apples” in the Cincinnati Police Department ruined his career with a bogus arrest.
"Ryan, Things in here don't react too well to bullets." - Marko Ramius
by TarZander on Apr 28, 2009 7:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Interesting angle
I think the bigger picture is does someone like this deserve to be drafted at all? As long as we continue to reward individuals that by all accounts do not live up to standards set by society, this type of anti-social behavior will continue. If he ends up making the team I am absolutely certain he will end up on the police blotter. Just think about it, we have an immature physically gifted athlete with anger management and other issues that now has access to a decent amount of money and nothing to prevent him from hitting the clubs while some of the finest red necks on Cincy’s police force wait around frothing at the mouth! Not to mention the first time the kid has a bad game and some Budweiser fueled idiot hits him smack in the face with the N word, can you say explosion? This was a bad decision, has Mike Brown written all over it. I will however volunteer to shadow this kid 24/7 and keep him out of trouble for lets say 150K and expenses….do we have a deal Mr. Brown???
by Tommyboy45 on Apr 29, 2009 1:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What Maske (of the WaPo) Said
Mark Maske covers the NFL for the Washington Post, and he gave the Bengals an A-. Here’s what he said: “Cincinnati… A-… The Bengals did extremely well by getting a big-time left tackle at sixth overall in Andre Smith, a first-round talent in LB Rey Maualuga in the second round and gifted DE Michael Johnson and solid TE Chase Coffman in the third round. The only possible argument is whether they perhaps should have taken Eugene Monroe over Smith at sixth.”
It’s pretty clear he looked only at the first three rounds. But the Bengals did extremely well in the lower rounds, getting a center, a punter and a fullback; and there’s reason to think they’ll all have a better chance than most 5th, 6th and 7th rounders to make the team and contribute to winning.
I think the national media dislikes the Bengals because of all those arrests in 2006, and until the team starts winning, there’s no reason for that media to take a fresh look at the team.
Which is why I look to this blog for much better and less biased news and opinion about the team. I think this is one of the best blogs in the SB Nation, so thanks for the great coverage of the Bengals draft.
by etabby on Apr 28, 2009 1:25 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
One of the reasons given that Cincy has more arrests than other teams
Is because it is a small city. I won’t pretend to say I know about the race relations of the city but any places that have racially aggravated riots generally have racial problems and especially economic distribution disparities.
Criminal profiling has been a hot topic for years and I don’t think the people of Cincy can cast stones about those in Arkansas. I agree with the thought process that what some people might get away with in larger cities, others do not in Cincinnati (and Arkansas).
To get back to the topic at hand I found that Consensus Grades was an excellent resource.
by Squizza on Apr 28, 2009 1:29 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
More Like, How Do We Grade The National Media ?
How about a generous D+
by laibach on Apr 29, 2009 1:23 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 


















