Should the Cincinnati Bengals look at acquring more? Or are the Bengals set?
by Josh Kirkendall on Apr 29, 2009 8:39 PM EDT
in Analysis
Email
PrintNow that the draft is several days complete, there's a refocusing on addressing immediate needs. We saw a quick surge of undrafted free agents that brought in interesting prospects such as Quan Crosby and Marlon Lucky. It's interesting to note that we've found no reference of the team's undrafted free agent signings on Bengals.com. I know, I know. Can't say anything until the actual contract is signed. Team policy.
The question now is, what, if any, positions should the team address.
Let's get this party started with an Alex Marvez piece that's titled "Post-draft needs for all 32 teams."
Bengals: Running back. Although finding a backup and potential replacement for Cedric Benson was a top draft priority, the Bengals filled other needs before tabbing Abilene Christian's Bernard Scott in the sixth round. Still, after the draft the Bengals also gave up on Chris Perry, plus cut recent waiver claim Gary Russell.
First off, how could we possibly know what free agents are available? Here. Offense | Defense.
Now it's our turn. What positions should we address? I think Marvez is right, we should still look at running back. Other spots? Should we look at linebacker, safety, or offensive line? Or do you think we're pretty much set?
33 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
i think it matters how much dough we have
but mike brown (former bears safety) would provide great experience and leadership for our defense. the guy is always in position and can flat out play the game
but he’s probably too much and the bengals might consider morgan trent a possible safety
I like this Mike Brown (former Bears safety)
He played both FS and SS with Chicago but was always getting hurt. I think his style would fit was Zimmer wants from his safeties.
by Cedric Benson Boat Party on Apr 29, 2009 9:00 PM EDT up reply actions
Very underrated
Blogger at CincyJungle.com -- SB Nation Cincinnati Bengals blog.
by Josh Kirkendall on Apr 29, 2009 8:58 PM EDT up reply actions
we already have a plucky, white
overachieving safety. His name is Corey Lynch. If not him, we can go find John Busing stocking shelves somewhere.
by IgnatiusJReilly on Apr 29, 2009 9:01 PM EDT up reply actions
Well, let's give him more credit than that.
In 2006, his final year with Cincinnati, he had six picks (two, if I recall correctly that saved wins) and four sacks. No Bengal defensive player this year achieved either of those numbers. And he did that in 14 games and only seven starts.
I’m only saying let’s give him more credit than playing just because of injury. He performed and at times came through.
Blogger at CincyJungle.com -- SB Nation Cincinnati Bengals blog.
by Josh Kirkendall on Apr 29, 2009 10:47 PM EDT up reply actions
the only one I see on these lists
not counting franchise players like Peppers or Suggs, that I’d like to sign- or resign in this case, is John Thornton.
by IgnatiusJReilly on Apr 29, 2009 9:00 PM EDT reply actions
Agreed. DT/DE. Veteran. Blogger.
Blogger at CincyJungle.com -- SB Nation Cincinnati Bengals blog.
by Josh Kirkendall on Apr 29, 2009 9:06 PM EDT up reply actions
Heck, why not!
You know he’d appreciate it too. Plus, I think he likes us anyway.
Blogger at CincyJungle.com -- SB Nation Cincinnati Bengals blog.
by Josh Kirkendall on Apr 29, 2009 10:48 PM EDT up reply actions
Give it some time
There will be some pretty decent names cut from other teams soon that we could look at for back ups (if we can get them cheap)
Richie Incognito would be brilliant-a mean, tough as nails interior lineman who can play center or guard. He was a restricted free agent of the Rams, so I suppose he has already signed his tender. Anyway, the Bengals should definitely be seeking upgrades right up to training camp and beyond. !) Road grader RT or OG/C. 2) CB depth or cover safety. 3) KR.
how?
Collins
A. Smith
Kooistra
Whitworth
and Levi is still on the team for now
by Joe Goodberry on Apr 30, 2009 12:11 PM EDT up reply actions
Hey Kirk, do you think the waive of cuts on Monday was a result of using all 11 picks, or because they’re looking to sign a couple more free agents?
I got ripped for suggesting Roy Williams was in their sights, but slashing 7 players this early in the offseason sure smelled funny to me. They only have to cut down to 80 players for training camp which is still 3 months away. And they never seem to nail down the draft pick’s contracts until July, so what’s up with the rush to save money????
3 yards and a pile of dust
RE:
I honestly don’t know their thinking. It could range from releasing these guys, very much aware that they’re not in the team’s plans, allowing those players to catch on with another team early rather than late. Could be a money issue too — not really a cap issue, rather a “we know you’re not going to be here anyway, so we’re letting you go.”
However, I don’t think it’s indicative that they’re looking to sign another player. Right now, if they want to sign someone, they can just go ahead and do it.
Blogger at CincyJungle.com -- SB Nation Cincinnati Bengals blog.
by Josh Kirkendall on Apr 30, 2009 8:56 AM EDT up reply actions
great points
thanks man, keep up the great work
3 yards and a pile of dust
by Hudepohl Dey on Apr 30, 2009 10:03 AM EDT up reply actions
Cuts
There is a 80 man limit (or so) on the offseason roster, once you bring in the 53 man roster, 7 man practice squad, 23 guys on IR add a few guys and let a few go you have met your limit. You have to cut some guys to sign colloge free agents and then cut some more to sign draft picks.
We should ALWAYS be scouring the planet for better talent.
That said, I agree with above posts that we are still in need of another good Offensive Guard and or Center.
I also am unsure we have a great return man. I want someone that teams consistantly kick away from.
I noticed Lorenzo Neal listed as a UFA
I know we already have two FB’s coming into camp but if Neal is healthy then this would be an extreme upgrade. If we could sign him we could cut Johnson and put Vakapuna on the practice squad as Neal is getting up there in years.
True, but FB is certainly not a settled positon
with Vakapuna never playing a down in the NFL and playing mostly RB in college, and Johnson is not exactly what I would call dependable. Neal is the best FB in the game and if he is health we should definitely make a reasonable offer.
by CincyMike56 on Apr 30, 2009 11:14 PM EDT up reply actions
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Certain photos copyright © 2012 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
