Report: Lions plan on taking Stafford, Bengals in position for one of the top-two offensive tackles?
I know, I know. You guys really only want to talk about Chad Johnson trades and character issues with the Bengals. However, there's a lot on our plate -- including a new episode of Lost tonight! Now would be as good a time as any to change the subject. PFT writes that "we’re told that the Detroit Lions currently plan to take quarterback Matthew Stafford with the first pick in the 2009 draft." Granted, it's not always advisable to take PFT for their word -- not because they like to spread lies, rather their sources are sometimes wrong. Furthermore, spreading misinformation tends to outweigh accurate information in the weeks leading up to the NFL draft -- even though I have no idea how misinformation for the first overall draft pick can possibly impact the draft (NO ONE PICKS BEFORE THEM).
Playing off this, if the Lions select Stafford with the first pick, that opens the door for the Bengals. A plausible scenario exists in which Cincinnati could draft Andre Smith with the sixth pick, once Jason Smith and Eugene Monroe were already selected. Many assumed if not Stafford, then the Lions drafted Jason Smith. If they go Stafford, that leaves Smith on the board. The Rams and Seahawks could select an offensive tackle respectively, keeping the scenario that Cincinnati drafts Smith, or Michael Oher, who many call a reach with the sixth pick. However, like the Bengals those two teams have several needs that could leave the Bengals with one of the two top offensive tackle prospects.
Ironically enough, during the SB Nation Mock Draft, the Lions didn't select an offensive tackle (or a quarterback) and we were still left with Andre Smith.
Of course, the Bengals will select a wide receiver anyway, making all of us feel stupid for thinking that blocking is kind of important.
0 recs |
10 comments
|
Comments
St louis is shopping number two, chiefs talking about Jason Smith, i hope smith will fall to us
by cinbengal_85@yahoo.com on Apr 8, 2009 4:26 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I want Aaron Curry, but no way he slides to us.
I’ll take Andre Smith of Eugene Monroe.
by "Mr. NC-17" on Apr 8, 2009 4:50 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Rumor has it that Mike Brown, to save money, will pass on the sixth pick and draft twice in the second.
by IgnatiusJReilly on Apr 8, 2009 7:29 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Knowing how well we've drafted in the second round...
Might be the best “plan” he’s ever had.
Blogger at CincyJungle.com -- SB Nation Cincinnati Bengals blog.
by Kirkendall on Apr 8, 2009 7:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I really hope monroe is still around at pick 6. Andre Smith is a beast but i am totally unsure about his character. Jason Smith is gonna go in the top 3 for sure.
by bengal fan in florida on Apr 8, 2009 8:27 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm not sure if Smith's character is in question
He’s had no brushes with the law, apparently worked his ass off at Bama both on and off the field, and made an error in judgment in regards to the contact with the agent that resulted in his missing the Sugar Bowl. Now, his maturity might be an issue because it would seem to be at the root of his strange conduct at the Combine. A lot of things thrown at him since are either untrue- his weight for instance, or misleading- his physique and his bench press results(arm length).
by IgnatiusJReilly on Apr 8, 2009 9:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed 100%
Issue here isn’t so much character as it is maturity and basic responsibility. Sometimes people group those under the same character umbrella, but I don’t agree with that.
Blogger at CincyJungle.com -- SB Nation Cincinnati Bengals blog.
by Kirkendall on Apr 8, 2009 11:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Or is it "100% Agree" or "Agree 100%"
Whatever, my subject line didn’t work out so much.
Blogger at CincyJungle.com -- SB Nation Cincinnati Bengals blog.
by Kirkendall on Apr 8, 2009 11:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Lost in this entire discussion...
…is why the Lions are looking so seriously at taking Stafford with the #1 pick in a year where the QB draft class isn’t exactly “livin’ too much in the ’83?”
by TheWalrus1971 on Apr 9, 2009 11:23 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 
















