Chad Johnson Traded to the Eagles -- Not Likely
I am somewhat incredulous at the trade buzz around Chad.
In February, I wrote that I didn't think it was worth it to trade Chad Johnson because, in my view, I didn't think he would command much in return.
Let's look at the facts.
While he was once the most feared wide receiver in the league, Chad is now 31. He has a torn labrum in his shoulder that should have been surgically repaired but wasn't. He is coming off his worst season. He continues to throw tantrums on the sideline and behave petulantly in the locker room. To further drive his stock down, last week he failed to report to the Bengals' off-season work out program.
In November, The Sporting News surveyed NFL scouts and published a list of the top 40 wide receivers. TJ was #11. Chad wasn't listed. I think it is clear that he is no longer regarded by those in the league as an elite wide receiver.
As Kirkendall wrote, ESPN's John Clayton has said the Bengals want a first and a third-round pick for Chad. No wonder Clayton says there is a 20% chance that Chad will be traded. If that is truly what the Bengals want for Chad, I think Clayton's guess is about 19% too high.
If the Bengals are lucky enough to get the Eagles or the Giants to give up a late pick in the first round, they should take it. At this point, I think a high second round pick, perhaps packaged with something in 4th round, is more than enough for Chad. Are you listening Oakland?
When he failed to have his shoulder repaired and did not report to off-season work outs last week, he breached the trust of his teammates and coaches.
Chad will get his due when he gets traded to a team with a sub-par QB and a coach that will punch his lights out if he tries to kiss him.
Note that I am joining Kirkendall's "juvenile" protest against a grown man changing his name to Ocho Cinco and will call him Chad Johnson as well.
6 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
The one possiblitiy
The one possibility I see is a package of Chad and the 6 pick for Philadelphia’s 2 firsts and their second. This would be done on draft day so that philadelphia could come away with a veteran proven reciever to take pressure off Desean Jackson and a elite DE. The scenario seems far-fetched but I could se it happen on draft day. I only see this happening if Jason Smith and Eugene Monroe are gone, and the top DE is on the board, but it could happen.
straight up for Philly’s 28 or the Giants’ 29. No muss, no fuss.
by IgnatiusJReilly on Apr 9, 2009 12:39 PM EDT reply actions
No way bro. We are talking about a 3rd rounder,
second at best, only if Philly gets its man or men in the first. If we don’t, we do not trade. We got ZERO for TO.
You may get ZERO for Chade.
NY may just draft Nicks,
Enjoy your upcoming season. your front office doesn’t get it. They think they are smart, but they need to learn from Philly and Dallas. Let the headache go already!
He will just get cut anyway, Cincy will eat the cap hit. Then he signs where he wants. Remember, learn from Philly. Trade that guy, and get something for him, or hold him and get nothing in return.
City of Champions!
philly's 28
Considering your need for a legit number one receiver and who might actually be available by the time 21 rolls around- say Nicks or maybe, maybe Heyward-Bey and
Considering McNab’s age and relationship with Chad, Chad’s topnotch abilitiy and experience versus a rookie coming in who’s name isn’t Crabtree,
28 doesn’t seem all that farfetched for Chad and is probably a bargain for you in the process. Also, FYI, Chad is light years away from TO. Chad’s not actually mentally ill and doesn’t routinely throw QBs under the bus. Not a fair comparison.
by IgnatiusJReilly on Apr 9, 2009 7:02 PM EDT up reply actions
I don't know, the air must be contaminated over there in Cincy. You aren't thinking straight bro.
There is no way we give up a first for Chad, Anquan maybe, Chad, NO WAY.
Would you trade William Beatty (OT) possible first year starter for Ocho Cinco. I think not, Beatty will be on the board at 28. We don’t need a receiver that bad, remember, we have a 28 pick, we can easily trade up to #7 with your team by giving you 21 and 28 and getty Crabtree if we were that desperate.
NO WAY JOSE, do you get a 1 for Chad. You should have traded him last year to Washington for those 2 first round picks. But your stupid front office said no.
Chad had a bad year, wants a new contract and is 31. There is no guarantee he is the same receiver anymore. He is only 1 or 2 years younger than Holt. Lets be real, that is a high risk for a top pick. NO way that happens.
City of Champions!

by 


















