Plenty of competition; renaming a blog... again
There's plenty of positions on this roster that are far from certain. There's a good chance that Jonathan Luigs has a leg up at center; there's also a chance that it's open competition -- best man wins. Will Michael Johnson be an outside linebacker, or a defensive end? Will he come in during passing defense packages and rush the quarterback? What about the three-man race at fullback? Then there's backup running back, a starting lineup on the offensive line, return men, and even long snapper. Yes, long snapper. Competition, competition, competition.
Since we brought up the trend of ESPN's blog named "AFC North Teams Not Named Bengals Blog," there was a piece wondering if the Steelers repeat, observations, read mailbag and a question about Lawrence Timmons replacing the recently departed Larry Foote. So it got me to thinking. Let's rename the "AFC North Teams Not Named Bengals Blog" to "We really only care about the Steelers, so that's all we're going to discuss" blog. Hey, we're just calling it like we see it.
Defensive coaches are smiling about Michael Johnson.
Fullback Chris Pressley has had a lot of obstacles in his life to get to this point.
Joe Reedy wraps up his observations of minicamp.
You can tell Chick Ludwig is getting pumped with "the infusion of talent in 2009" will give the Bengals "more flexibility on third-down passing situations — ahhh, the nickel defense — than they’ve had in a long, long time."
Tight End Darius Hill on being asked to stick around after the final practice on Sunday.
"I figured it was good news, but I didn't want to jump ahead of myself," he said. "I definitely felt a weight lifted off my shoulders when he told me he wanted to sign me."
Would you go after Simeon Rice? Between 2001 and 2005, Rice averaged 13.5 sacks. In the two seasons afterwards (2006, 2007), Rich recorded three sacks in 16 games and missed the 2008 season.
0 recs |
10 comments
|
Comments
I also don't care
I disagree with the name change though. While the Steelers aare the most featured there, he will post things from the other teams readiily. I suspect he only mentions the Bengals when requested by management.
by jim0ijk on May 5, 2009 2:29 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
*crickets*
Only for the story about Carson selling his house at a loss…don’t send Bourne or anything, Kirk! ;-)
Seriously, though…I’m sure Marvin is happy to see that Michael Johnson might end up being the DE/LB he originally wanted to have in David Pollack.
The name change is fitting for the most part, although he does talk about the Ravens a lot, too. Let’s see…“AFC North Teams Not From Ohio?” No, if you consider the original home of the Ravens, that doesn’t work, either. Hmm…
As much of a fan as I am of the body of work amassed by Simeon Rice, I would have to say no at this point. Odom, Geathers, Johnson…between those guys, the Bengals will have enough money tied up in DEs that they wouldn’t be able to afford the price tag.
by TheWalrus1971 on May 5, 2009 2:35 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
LOL
NOOOOOOOOO (Do Not Want)
Man, what geeks we are…
by TheWalrus1971 on May 5, 2009 4:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
"It's only one weekend, but he looks like he could be an outside linebacker."
This quote from Joe Reedy’s column got me thinking, has there ever been a 6’ 7" starting linebacker in the NFL before? I could see him coming in as a LB for strictly pass rushing purposes on third down but the idea of someone 6’ 7" playing LB on a regular basis seems pretty unlikely
by CincyMike56 on May 5, 2009 3:52 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Right...
The comparison to Richard Dent really got me thinking about him becoming THAT type of player…what a steal either way, though.
by TheWalrus1971 on May 5, 2009 4:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
On a completely different note...
The server seems really sluggish right about now. Just saying.
by TheWalrus1971 on May 5, 2009 4:23 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Videos won't play at all for me here, Walrus
Don’t know whether that means the server is slow or maybe it’s a Firefox issue- Irefuse to upgrade to version 3 because they were rude about asking and it crashes repeatedly on my computer.
by IgnatiusJReilly on May 5, 2009 7:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Running FF 3.0.10 here with no issues, just FYI…
by TheWalrus1971 on May 6, 2009 12:11 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wow…and it seems the sluggish server/connection issue has been resolved.
by TheWalrus1971 on May 6, 2009 12:11 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 


















