Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Miikka Kiprusoff Wins 300th Game, Buffalo Crushes Boston

Depth of the 2009 Cincinnati Bengals Part 1: Offense

Last night, we learned that the Bengals have excellent depth at the placekicking position in the form of Chad (Ochocinco) Johnson. Reviews from the media and around the league (except Skip Bayless) seem to approve of Johnson's kick. Jets Kicker Jay Feely gave Chad a 80/85 grade for his extra point from a technical point of view, saying "the only thing form wrong that he did technically is that he followed through too much, and his hips opened up... but, I mean, he got good elevation... and I was just as impressed with his kickoff! I think Skip as mad though because I think he kicked better than Skip could kick."

Feely also gave him an 85/85 for his kickoff. It's safe to say Feely is an Ochocinco fan. Speaking of Chad, Mark Schlereth just mentioned on SportsCenter's Fantasy Draft special that he thinks we'll see our star #1 WR recover to his previous form.

Moving on to the meat of this post, I contend that the Bengals are deeper across the board this year than we've seen in quite some time. Let's go position by position down the depth chart to determine how resilient our team will be as we sfight through inevitable NFL injuries this year.

Quarterback: Carson Palmer is obviously the key to making the Bengals go this year. Without Palmer, Cincinnati will not win that many games. But this year, I'm more comfortable with J.T. O'Sullivan than I was with he who must not be named from Harvard last year. So far this preseason, he's shown the ability to complete passes for more than 3 yards, as evidenced by beautiful throws last night to Chris Henry and Jerome Simpson (there was no pass interference) down the field. If Carson goes down, God forbid, we might not lose as much as we did last year.

Running Back: Running back this year is the first interesting position I'll touch on. Cedrick Benson comes into this season as the undisputed starter. But I don't think he'll get feature back carries, especially if he continues to rely on quickness and agility rather than downhill power running for which he is reputed. Given this trend, which was especially apparent last night, I think Brian Leonard is a definitive lock (he was anyway) to make the team and may steal some goal line carries.

Bengals.com lists DeDe Dorsey at #3, and he is no longer eligible for the practice squad. Dorsey is an injury liability, but has shown explosiveness nearly every time he's taken the field in orange and black.

That leaves Bernard Scott, James Johnson, and Marlon Lucky as the odd men out. Lucky is the first cut here, as far as I can tell. He's gotten only 2 touches this preseason, and must not be ready to go if he's getting that little playing time. In extremely limited time, James Johnson has looked decent, but I doubt he makes the team either.

If the Bengals carry 4 tailbacks, I'd assume they keep Scott since they burned a pick on him and his ceiling is so high. The biggest problem I've noticed with him is slow recognition and decision making this preseason. Last night, he missed a couple of holes as he stood around behind the line of scrimmage while he tried to figure out which way to go. When he does hit the hole though, Scott is quick and elusive, and is a big home run threat.

Really, though, no matter which backs the Bengals keep, this will be a deep position in 2009. There is talent all the way down the line. Of course, tailback success is largely dependant on the men pushing each other around in the trenches.

Fullback: On Hard Knocks, we saw running backs coach Jim Anderson reveal that, essentially, our fullback competition is tight this year. The Bengals.com depth chart lists Jeremy Johnson first, Fui Vakapuna second, and Chris Pressley third.

I have to imagine that Johnson makes the team if he continues to keep his work ethic up. He helped Rudi Johnson to a franchise record setting seasons in 2004 and 2005 and is a veteran of the system. But, the coaches have been really high on Vakapuna and Pressley.

I wouldn't be surprised if two of these guys make the team and the other is put on the practice squad. I'd almost expect the Bengals to try to maintain some sort of control over these guys this year as an insurance policy.

Tackle: The Bengals have at least insurance-level depth at both tackle positions this year, assuming Andre Smith at some point signs a contract. Dennis Roland has played well this preseason, indicating that he will be serviceable in an emergency substitution.

The front-runners, though, have looked pretty damn good for the most part. Andrew Whitworth and Anthony Collins have emerged as above-average offensive tackles. I doubt that either of them are Pro Bowl talents, however.

Andre Smith, if he signs, will get playing time this year. His talent indicates that he'll be a mainstay at tackle for years to come, but he is a rookie this year and I believe he would be only a marginal improvement over Collins, who has been present for camp. Regardless, we've got 3 starting quality tackles on this team right now as far as I am concerned.

Guard: The shallowest position on the offense, Bobbie Williams will have to stay healthy this year or the guards may be a sorry bunch. Nate Livings has played, for the most part, well so far in the preseason. But he will have his hands full with the Casey Hamptons of the AFCN. Scott Kooistra is not the worst back up the team could have, but there's a reason the now 7-year veteran is riding pine and Nate Livings, who was impressive at the end of last season let's not forget, is starting. The starters really need to stay healthy here.

Center: Bengals fans know the importance of quality center play in unifying and leading an offensive line. This year, the unit is slightly more veteran, despite some guys getting their first pro starts, these are men that have been in the league. The unit should benefit from the emergence of Kyle Cook, who looked great against the quality NT Vince Wilfork last night, winning the initial "push" battle about 3/4 of the time in the early going yesterday. The O-Line wasn't great at picking up blitzes consistently, but I expect that is something that will improve when Carson returns to the lineup.

The great thing this year is that we have a legitimate backup in center-of-the-future Jonathan Luigs. Luigs' college record at the center position is excellent. If Cook goes down, there just isn't a huge fall-off when we get to Luigs, whose skill set projects him to be a consistent but not quite dominant offensive centerpiece.

Wide Receiver: The deepest position on the offense is unquestionable the wide receiving corps this year. Antonio Chatman is currently listed as the 6th WR on the depth chart, and for a guy that was the #3 last year to be not making the team, that tells you something about the men that have stepped up and look great so far in preseason play.

Chad Johnson has, so far, looked like the Pro Bowl receiver we've been used to the past almost-decade. Chris Henry looks like he has accepted that wide receivers have to fight for some catches, and has looked good over the middle and over the top, too. You know what you get with Laveranues Coles, a solid guy who might get hurt but will be willing to go over the middle.

Young guys Andre Caldwell and Jerome Simpson are pretty good friends, and continue to develop in the wings. Chad won't last forever, and Coles is on the downside of his career at this point. Behind these "big 5", which I'd contend are one of the best 5-WR units in the league, Freddie Brown, Maurice Purify, and Quan Crosby should battle for a roster spot. Very deep position this year.

Tight End: This position looked a lot better when Reggie Kelly was healthy. But even without him, I think we're OK at TE. Ben Utecht and Chase Coffman both offer superb receiving potential for Carson Palmer this year, which we haven't had since he was drafted. Hopefully Daniel Coats steps into Kelly's shoes and has a good showing as the primary blocking Tight End this year.

What are your thoughts on the backups this year? Is there anyone I'm forgetting that has been impressive in the preseason?

Comment 11 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

RB and FB

1. Benson
2. Leonard
3. Scott
4. Johnson

I think your point that of “regardless we have good RB depth” is not found in any proof. The top 2 guys have extensive injury history, Scott is a rookie with 3 arrests to his name, Johnson, Dorsey and Lucky all have knocks on them and would not necessarily get a spot on any of the 31 other NFL teams. I’m concerned, and don’t like what I see of Benson b/w the tackles, Leonard’s general lameness except for his size in red zone, and blocking “awareness”.

Now, all this can be taken care of IF we have a solid, reliable FB like the good ol’ days of Lorenzo blocking for C. Dillon. But too often, we have lazy uncommitted FBs like Stanley Wilson and Jeremi Johnson. I would prefer a committed guy like Pressley or Fui V. Unfortunately, Mike Brown has a man-chub for ol’ Meatball Johnson and we all know that his 1st string status is secure.

You may recall that before Training Camp, Marvin Lewis said somewhere that if Jeremi Johnson might not be back if he can’t come into camp at the weight that was set (260) and still he didn’t come in at a hair over 276. And you saw his play – he’s not even trying to block.

*ps – Dorsey got a spot on the Colts 3 yrs ago for 3 games and everyone says “Hey, not ALL of our players are picked up from the trash heap!”

by Yaccub Fleishcman on Aug 21, 2009 8:58 PM EDT reply actions  

Benson was healthy in a short year last year.

Scott hasn’t gotten into trouble quite yet, but I think he has a ways to go on the playing field.

I don’t think we have great running backs, but I think we have good depth, and the drop off if we lose Cedrick Benson would not be insurmountable.

by jsl413 on Aug 21, 2009 9:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

RBs

I think the drop off from Benson is low, but because Benson is not an elite RB. As a unit they are deep but relative to the fact they really may not be that good. I hope they are though. Scott does offer the highest ceiling.

As Kirkendall said earlier, Jeremi Johnson was blocking well vs. NE.

by mskiles314 on Aug 21, 2009 10:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

RB

Maybe I’m just drunk on the Kool-aid (ok, there is no maybe), but I look at the RB position differently. I think their history is well noted, and should be discussed.

However, there’s no reason to believe that Benson’s history of injury will surface this year, save for the typical injuries that happen with any player. Many observers suggest he’s in the best shape of his career and he came into Training Camp in tremendous shape. I also think that the more we see Leonard, the more impressed we’ll be and let’s let bygones be bygones with Scott.

I agree. The depth is good as a unit, and there’s no indication that their history will bite this team. An optimistic point of view, I know.

I rewatched the game and your analysis on Scott against NE is spot on. He was very indecisive. There were Patriots swarming, while not hitting him, causing him to stutter slightly.

I do agree with Yaccub 100% that we need a good FB. However, if you watched Jeremi against NE, you’d come away more impressed. He was poppin’ them. I’m bold enough to say that JJ makes the team.

Blogger at CincyJungle.com -- SB Nation Cincinnati Bengals blog.

by Josh Kirkendall on Aug 21, 2009 10:12 PM EDT reply actions  

cheers

Well, cheers to you – you threw out a good estimation of where the bengals stand on offense, and you have your prioritieies right in focusing on the o-line and the whole team game of blocking leading to running lanes. That’s something that it seems like most analysts don’t really recognize in their evaluation of football. Anyhow, I agree with your evaluations of C, G, and OT… well done!

by Yaccub Fleishcman on Aug 22, 2009 3:55 AM EDT reply actions  

On Jeremi

Just acknowledge that he’s not the long term solution to FB. Plan for now and the future, and plan with a guy who is committed to WINNING.

by Yaccub Fleishcman on Aug 22, 2009 4:06 AM EDT reply actions  

Jeremi is not a long term solution.

He is, however, the most likely of the current bunch to be successful in the early going this year. I believe this due to familiarity with the Bengals system for the most part and a solid NFL resume back in the glory years of 2004 and 2005.

Fullbacks are rarely organizational focuses, however, and I think it remains to be seen how the position battle finishes up. Either Vakapuna or Pressley could beat out Johnson. I think it’s still up in the air

by jsl413 on Aug 22, 2009 4:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

Agreed with both

JJ is no longer the long-term solution.

I don’t think Vakapuna is winning the spot either as a blocking FB. He could be a short-yardage back. But the one thing I took away against NE is that he looked very Coats-like last year. Though Coats actually looks miles ahead of where he looked last year.

Blogger at CincyJungle.com -- SB Nation Cincinnati Bengals blog.

by Josh Kirkendall on Aug 22, 2009 12:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Cincinnati Bengals.

Editor-In Chief

Cj_small Josh Kirkendall

5255_133614603784_666578784_2414703_1976100_n_small Jason Garrison

Editor/Managing Editor

Rudiblanket_small Anthony Cosenza

Authors

Photo_3_small BeerRun

010511170110_small Joe Goodberry

40297_422933299865_509514865_4658259_6466915_n_small Ryan Harper

Moderators

Nfl palewook

680764146_0eac16fabd_small 80%OFTHETIMEIMRIGHTEVERYTIME

Koolaid_small UpStateMike

Bengals_stamp_by_jamaal10_small Doc Scratch