Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Four TCU Football Players Among 17 Arrested In Drug Ring

Bengals offered Andre Smith (sixth-round pick) less than what Darrius Heyward-Bey (seventh-round pick) received

Sometimes Twitter can bring a smile to your face; especially as an astute observer. Of course, the Denial of Service that hit Twitter on Thursday caused so many people so much social networking pain aside, I've been watching what people are Tweeting Alvin Keels (Andre Smith's agent). Here's some notable Tweets.

  • "Please bring Andre to Georgetown by Monday, Alvin. Please. Collins is no slouch and Andre's losing out, man!"
  • "Don't you have some Bengals work to do?"
  • One Man Crimewave Tweeted to Keels: "What are you doing running while Andre sits?" after Keels Tweeted, "I just got in from a good 3 mile run..did it in 26 minutes. I have to get better. About to hit this band workout! then back to work!"
  • "The Bengals Fans are really wondering when Andre will get into camp. He's slotted...what's the holdup?"
  • "how about getting our guy Andre signed. He needs to be in camp with all these TE's going down"
  • "Andre Smith???/ Who Dey Nation awaits news!"
  • Keels Tweeted "I have a bad headache right now! I don't even want to get off of my couch to go to my bed! Migraines are the worst!", which drew this response, "I'd have a bad headache too with as long it's taking you to get your 1st rounder signed. Get it done and be done."

As for Smith, and the progress of negotiations, there isn't any. However, camps started hitting the media trail yesterday, making public their most recent negotiations. And while the Brown family is the Brown family and you can't teach old dogs new tricks, this did surprise me.

According to parties familiar with the negotiations, the Bengals have offered of $33 million. That's $5.25 million less than what the seventh pick, Darrius Heyward-Bey, signed for with Oakland.

Reedy continues:

Smith's camp is looking for something slightly higher than Heyward-Bey's deal. The sides had not talked since Monday as of this morning.

Honestly. We all figured that the unspoken mandate of paying a rookie based on where they picked was a given. The hold up is that you offered $5.25 million less than Darius Heyward-Bey? Seriously?

The Bengals are remaining firm in trying to sign Smith for less. As of Friday morning, eight first-round picks remain unsigned, including picks 8-11. The Bengals are possibly waiting for those picks to sign and see if they follow the same strategy of signing for less or the same amount as last year.

It's one thing to be firm when you feel a player is trying to extort too much money out of you, based on a principle that the player selected ahead of you was a quarterback; thus valued more. I could have understood waiting for Aaron Curry's deal to create an adjusted ceiling. Hell. I might have even supported that. After the way the system is structured, the way teams conduct negotiations for top-value draft picks, it's very surprising that the Bengals would try to offer Smith something less than what the seventh round pick received. How in the hell did they expect Keels or Smith would accept that?

Maybe I shouldn't be surprised. But I am.

Poll
What do you think of the Bengals offer?
The Bengals offered the right amount.
258 votes
What the hell are the Bengals thinking?
543 votes

801 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 28 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I Hate You, Mike Brown

“The Bengals are remaining firm in trying to sign Smith for less. "

And this is EXACTLY why this ****ing franchise will NEVER shake the “laughingstock” tag. Meanwhile, teams like Arizona and Seattle go to the Super Bowl and Mike Brown sits around continuing to torpedo this team, keeping us in a perpetual loop of 8-8. Or worse.

The 11-5 season is the exception that proves the rule.

by IFChris on Aug 7, 2009 2:06 PM EDT reply actions  

The 11-5 season is the exception that proves the rule.

Mm-hmm. And it just keeps getting smaller and smaller in the rear-view mirror… [sigh]

by TheWalrus1971 on Aug 7, 2009 2:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

i agree

and its a negotiation. mike is a business man, obviously he’s not a football guru, but he knows how to negotiate.

i like how he is putting his foot down, besides i think anthony collins is better anyways

by nadfflictar on Aug 7, 2009 2:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well I had to go for “right amount” because there was no other option. I would have offered a twinkie and a pat on the back. But then I never wanted them to draft him the first place. I’ll hope I was wrong of course, but so far its not good…

But seriously, look at the raw numbers. If this “insulting” (whatever) offer were signed he’d have a cap value of somewhere around 6.6 million a year. Compare that to the rest of the OL numbers for 2008. Looking at just those with a cap hit greater than 6.3M last year, and filling in their official positions per Yahoo sports for this year, we have the following people:

Joe Thomas, Eric Steinbach, Walter Jones, Orlando Pace, Jordan Gross, Stacy Andrews, Chad Clifton, Jeff Faine, Max Starks, Mike Gandy, Levi Brown, Bryant McKinnie, Marvel Smith, Steve Hutchinson, Michael Roos, Derrick Dockery, Ryan Diem

Of those people, the highest paid RT on the list was Levi Brown of the Cardinals at $6.7M. Then Marvel Smith of the Steelers at $6.6M. Finally you have Ryan Diem of the Colts playing tail end charlie for our list at $6.3M.

As you can see, what they offered is right at the amount for the highest paid right tackles in the league.

Somebody speculated a long time ago that they were moving him to right tackle more as a cost-cutting move than anything else. I’m not sure about the “more than anything else” but I’d be willing to bet real money now that it WAS a factor in the decision to move him. No matter how much of a “natural lefty” Levi may be, putting Andre on the right side allows them to give him a lower offer than they would have the slightest chance of getting away with for the other side. By comparison look at the insane numbers for Joe Thomas.

And remember Jake Long from last year? Notice him missing? That’s because of the way the Fins structured his contract with no salary and huge bonuses to push the cap hit into the future. That may come back to bite them in the future, but for now it kept his cap numbers down. His real numbers though are right at 7.2 million once you prorate his signing bonus. But both are LT not RT. And that’s the kicker. I’m pretty sure the Bengals are refusing to offer more than the #1 overall pick last year got for a “more important” position. Prorate out what DHB got and it’s right at 7.5 million per year.

Logical. Makes lots of sense. Pisses off both Andre and Alvin I’m sure, but it’s a defensible position. I wonder if this is Mike’s way of providing ammo to the CBA negotiators and he actually doesn’t want to sign Andre after all. That would actually make me feel rather happy. I already said I never wanted him and I still don’t. Let AC have the spot and leave the A&A team swinging in the wind.

by FriarBob on Aug 7, 2009 2:43 PM EDT reply actions  

Doh I had to cut the chart since it wouldn’t post right… Joe Thomas’ number last year was $9,460,000. Yikes!

Oh and Stacy Andrews may have played RT last year but this year he’s a right GUARD. Which is about the only position I’d consider playing him at (except maybe for ball boy). I know others may have disagreed but I was delighted that he left no matter how many headaches it gave us in the draft. Good riddance IMO.

by FriarBob on Aug 7, 2009 2:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oops I misread my magic chart too. Jake Long actually made only $6.22M last year. No wonder Mike wants to play hardball. Right or not, offering more money than a LT who was the #1 overall pick last year has got to be hard to swallow.

by FriarBob on Aug 7, 2009 2:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

I hate it

that you’re right Friar. As a fan I want to see Andre on the field, but this rookie salary thing is getting way out of control. In some ways though I just think that Brown needs to just swallow his pills until we get some sort of rookie salary scale system in place.

This is our year!

by Paul Cannon on Aug 7, 2009 9:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

I see this going on into the regular season

First time I shot her, I shot her in the side.
Hard to watch her suffer, but with the second shot she died...

by btcoop71 on Aug 7, 2009 2:55 PM EDT reply actions  

DHB's deal was nuts anyways

He shouldnt have recieved as much as he did. The raiders ruined it for us.

"Ghiaciuc's play was a distraction"

by Joe Goodberry on Aug 7, 2009 3:21 PM EDT reply actions  

Collins is ok

I think we’ll be pretty solid with Collins anyways. You guys forget about Smith for this year. If he plays, he better be good, and if he doesn’t, I don’t think it’ll hurt us that much since Collins looks solid.

If you don't live like you wanna, you live like you shouldn't

by trotanoy on Aug 7, 2009 3:24 PM EDT reply actions  

RE:

The system is out of control for the top-ten picks. And, in reality, Mike Brown is probably making a defensive offer — saying that he’s paying roughly for a right tackle, which is a lower value than left tackle in terms of average salary.

However, here’s the thing that won’t change. DHB did receive that much money. And Keels wants more. Brown going against the grain, while some may appreciate that, isn’t negotiation when they’re fully aware that Keels won’t go for anything at or below DHB’s salary.

So either Keels has to concede, or Brown has to, at least, offer something more than what DHB received.

Now, what’s not known is the amount the Bengals offered in guaranteed money. What if Mike Brown offered over $24 million, however, with a total value of around $33 million? Would that concession find a middle ground?

Blogger at CincyJungle.com -- SB Nation Cincinnati Bengals blog.

by Josh Kirkendall on Aug 7, 2009 3:28 PM EDT reply actions  

If Bey made 35...

…rightly or wrongly, then offering him less than that is just not smart business. The rumor on Curry is 45 million, meaning the correct offer to Smith IS NOT 33 million.

We can discuss rookie salaries another day, but for Brown not offer Smith 40 million is just plain stupid — unless he does NOT want to protect his franchise quarterback. Perhaps he’d rather take some pointless, ineffectual stand that will ultimately fail just to make a point instead of doing what’s necessary.

They KNEW they’d be in this freaking position with such a high pick. If they didn’t want to pay top ten money, they should’ve traded the hell out and drafted Oher.

by IFChris on Aug 7, 2009 4:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

How? There was nobody else interested (enough, at least) in trading up.

I wanted them to trade out as well, but I’m not surprised it didn’t happen. It would have been nice if they’d punted on it. Just refuse to hand in a pick and let the draft proceed without them. Then after awhile they can pick somebody they like down around 15 or so. Mike obviously is stubborn enough in just about every other area, I wish he’d been stubborn enough to refuse to pick top-10.

by FriarBob on Aug 8, 2009 1:05 AM EDT up reply actions  

Um...

…someone who wanted Sanchez more than the Jets would’ve been willing. JMO.

by IFChris on Aug 8, 2009 2:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

Why would someone who wanted Sanchez more than the Jets did trade to the six spot when Sanchez was picked at the fifth spot?

by Raging Clue on Aug 9, 2009 12:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

My point exactly :)

by FriarBob on Aug 9, 2009 6:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

I too am torn on this one

The rookie pay system, at least for 1st round picks is broken, but it is what it is until the new CBA. The 2011 lock out will be worth it if this is one of the problems fixed. I am tired of kids holding out because they can’t get their millions. Screw them, let them work a real job and see how they do. No other career feild has a higher entry level salary than a esatablished veteran salary.

I also hope Crabtree sits out a year, he wil get less money next year, because his draft stock will plummet the second time around. Diva pro-bowl wide receivers are bad enough, a diva wide reciever with no catches on his resume is even more annoying.

by jim0ijk on Aug 7, 2009 3:53 PM EDT reply actions  

Tough call

Rookie contracts are out of hand as it is. For once, I actually don’t blame them for doing this, especially when you have a player who appeared to not take pre-draft preparation as serious as you would expect someone vying for an NFL Roster spot to take it. Yes it is embarrassing to have an unsigned rookie.

On the other hand, when compared to this year’s draft and not last year’s, you have to pay him more than Heyward-Bey. Right or wrong, this precedent has already been set.

Of course, I didn’t like this pick and really think Anthony Collins is going to be a very good NFL tackle, so I really don’t care as much as I should.

by Cedric Benson Boat Party on Aug 7, 2009 5:36 PM EDT reply actions  

whoops

Just realized Gholston got 40 million last year. That should at least be the offer. Of course, with DHB getting 20% more than last year’s 7th pick, I can see why the agent wants to get his guy some $$$, especially considering how cut throat it is for agents to sign highly valued projected first round picks.

I still like Collins.

by Cedric Benson Boat Party on Aug 7, 2009 5:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

A Collins at LT and L Whit at RT would be ideal

But even if that is so, (which it won’t be, because the Bengals have their tackles flipped reversed), we still need to get Andre into camp because after cutting Willie last year, Levi this year, and not resigning Stacey…the OT position is a little short on depth!

I agree the rookie contracts are asinine, but they are what they are and you’ve got to pay the $ per the slots to sign your guy. And the Bengals aren’t doing that, so they’ve only got themselves to blame for Andre not being in camp.

by ephram on Aug 7, 2009 5:45 PM EDT reply actions  

After having won the stare-down with Chad 8 5, and not trading him…maybe Mike Brown is a little over inflated and thinks he can any negotiation that he sets his sights on…even low-balling the #6 pick compared to the slotted contracts already established?

by ephram on Aug 7, 2009 5:47 PM EDT reply actions  

ROOKIE CAP NEEDED!

This is getting out of hand fast…. 1ST of you have #1 Pick Matthew Stafford getting paid more then Tom Brady who has 3 Superbowl titles, and is one of the top QBs in the game. I dislike Brady, but stafford should not be making more then him… Seeing as stafford hasn’t thrown an NFL pass yet.

All of these rookie signing problems could be fixed very easily. The NBA has a rookie cap and there is never any problem with NBA teams signing their top picks.

Maybe just maybe you think the NFL will get a F^&*ing clue…. but, maybe they wont.

by chuckyj1 on Aug 8, 2009 12:26 AM EDT reply actions  

Well I think they want to have one, but the NFLPA is fighting it (in the media at least) with a load of malarky that unfortunately it seems at times that far too few people can see through.

by FriarBob on Aug 8, 2009 1:07 AM EDT up reply actions  

Rookie cap needed... but so what?

Everyone agrees that a rookie cap should be brought in, but as of now it doesn’t exist. Until it does, you work with the system that’s there. Effectively throwing away a #6 pick in order to make some grand statement of principle, or implicit criticism of the Raiders for their crazy draft choice and the deal they gave him… well, that’s just bad football.

Compounding this folly is the fact that they’re trying to have Smith go for a deal that’s almost 20% less than last year’s #6 got. I mean… come on already.

by Mr. X on Aug 8, 2009 1:13 AM EDT reply actions  

Um, no, they are offering more than last year’s #6. Not MUCH more, but they are offering more. And you know it’s always possible that what they are offering is a starting point in the hopes that they can meet in the middle somewhere and end up with a half-way reasonable (within the insane system we’re stuck with, at least) deal.

by FriarBob on Aug 9, 2009 6:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

Plenty of people complain about the rookie pay scale, but I will applaud Mike Brown for being proactive about it. What do the Bengals lose by not signing Andre Smith? He’s an unknown quantity at this point, so he should be paid as such. By holding out, he only costs himself more money, and the team already has Anthony Collins, who has already produced very well at this level, and will be just fine at right tackle (which you can’t empirically say about Andre). At this point he’s probably cost himself the starting spot until at least week 8, if not the entire season, so that’s even less reason that MIkey boy should pony up. Why pay for a season you’re not going to get?

by Raging Clue on Aug 9, 2009 12:07 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Cincinnati Bengals.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
What To Do With $60Million Dollars
Madmen_icon_small
Bengal Fans, Here's How to End Blackouts
Small
T-Cha's New Depth Mock Draft

Recent FanPosts

Small
Colts trade the Andrew Luck to the Bengals for ...
33081-m_small
Somewhat realistic FA acquasitions
Small
First Round Mock
Small
T-Cha's Full Analysis and In-Depth Research Dissecting The Bengals
Small
Please go get Mario Williams Mike Brown!!!!!
Crucifixionbytheophanesthecretan_small
What positions do NFL teams really value? (Running Backs?)
33081-m_small
Curveball strategy
Small
Hello Again!
Picture_059_small
Filling holes in the roster: Guard
Thumbnail_small
Bengal4ever Mock / FA

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Editor-In Chief

Cj_small Josh Kirkendall

5255_133614603784_666578784_2414703_1976100_n_small Jason Garrison

Editor/Managing Editor

Rudiblanket_small Anthony Cosenza

Authors

Photo_3_small BeerRun

010511170110_small Joe Goodberry

40297_422933299865_509514865_4658259_6466915_n_small Ryan Harper

Moderators

Nfl palewook

680764146_0eac16fabd_small 80%OFTHETIMEIMRIGHTEVERYTIME

Koolaid_small UpStateMike

Bengals_stamp_by_jamaal10_small Doc Scratch