Blaming is such an easy thing to do; but I'm not blaming the Bengals defense
If you're one to believe that you think the defense should be blamed for the Bengals 12-7 loss, let us give you some things to think about. On the first nine drives of the game, the Bengals punted seven times, botched a Field Goal attempt and threw a second-quarter interception. Furthermore, of the first five possessions, the Bengals drove to the Denver Broncos side of the field and twice drove inside the Broncos 40-yard line. They didn't score any points. In the second half after the first punt, the Bengals offense went three-and-out in three consecutive possessions, recording only 24 yards total in the first four possessions of the second half. Stinkin' second half adjustments, who needs them?
Before the Broncos scored on the 87-yard touchdown to win the game, the Bengals defense held the Broncos offense to only 215 yards of offense. They forced eight punts, five three-and-outs, three sacks and on only three possessions did the Broncos offense record more than one first down. Rey Maualuga recorded eight tackles, including two on special teams. Antwan Odom recorded two sacks, and two additional hits on the quarterback along with three total tackles for loss. Fanene had a sack and a tackle for loss while Pat Sims recorded another hit on the quarterback. Roy Williams led the Bengals defense with nine tackles.
It's easy though. The Bengals defense gave up an 87-yard touchdown. Therefore, they're to blame. If one wishes to over-simplify things and point to one moment in a 60-minute game in which saw 114 snaps, I can't persuade them. Of the other 59-plus minutes, the Bengals didn't do enough of the little things to assure themselves that a loss wouldn't come down to one fluke/lucky play (sorry Broncos fans, but you'd feel the same way). This Bengals offense can not wait 59 minutes before scoring their first points in the game. Asking the defense to hold the opposition to less than a touchdown each week isn't just unfair, it's impossible. So what happened? Did having Carson Palmer out for three preseason games kill whatever rhythm they could have had?
But it's hard to sit here and actually blame the defense.
After giving up successive runs to Correll Buckhalter for 22 yards rushing to start the game, the Bengals defense allowed a one-yard run, two incomplete passes before the Broncos punted the football. After Knowshon Moreno picked up five yards up the middle on the following possession, Keith Rivers stuffs Moreno for no-gain and Antwan Odom swats a pass at the line of scrimmage. Broncos punt. The story continues. On the third possession, Jonathan Fanene sacks Kyle Orton, Marshall picks up eight yards on a pass and Odom sacks Orton. Broncos punt. On the next possession, the Broncos go three plays, four yards, punt. On the next possession, they go three plays, eight yards, punt. With 1:48 left in the first half, the Broncos did kick a field goal with :04 left in the half after a nine-play drive. Fine. Three points. Blaming the defense yet? Not even close. At this point, there's no way the Bengals should be losing the way this defense is playing. But the Bengals offense assured it.
In the first play of the second half, the Bengals defense dropped Knowshon Moreno four yards behind the line of scrimmage. After a false start, the Broncos picked up12 yards on two plays. Punt. On the second drive of the second half, the Broncos would pick up two first downs. After picking up their second, Denver was left with a second-and-one at the Denver 40-yard line. Buckhalter was stuffed and the Bengals forced an incomplete pass. Punt.
After allowing a field goal to take a six-point lead, and after the Bengals continued to look terribly offensively, the Broncos had the ball at their own 35-yard line with 13:23 left in the game. Nine plays later, Denver's offense lines up at the Cincinnati 35-yard line on third-and-16. Already in position to kick a field goal, if Denver picks up yards on third down, it's that much easier to take a nine-point lead. With this offense, there's no chance that the Bengals could overcome a two possession deficit with seven minutes left in the game. Antwan Odom, lined up at the left defensive tackle spot, sacked Orton for a seven-yard loss. No way the Broncos attempt a field goal. So they punted, which gave the Bengals more than enough time to drive the length of the field, to take the lead with less than 40 seconds remaining in the game.
I believe the Bengals defensive performance was more than good. It gave Cincinnati every opportunity to win the football game. If the Bengals offense shows up, the 87-yard touchdown pass to end the game, isn't important. And if you want to blame the defense for the loss because of that one play, then you're not going to get me to agree. I'll grant as much that they may have made a mistake. The offense made many, many more. Offensive holding, offensive pass interference, Anthony Collins' two sacks allowed, the execution (and/or play calling) to start the second half, dropped passes by Laveranues Coles, a tipped pass that turned into an interception, missed blocks (or missed assignments) on rushing plays around the edges. We could go on.
But our job isn't to pile on -- yea, right. But it doesn't really matter how one side of the football does when it's a loss, does it? That's all that matters. And the Bengals head into week two against the Green Bay Packers 0-1.
0 recs |
29 comments
|
Comments
Props to the D
one little mistake made a world of difference but i’ll take those odds if the Defense plays like that every week
by Jaydolla on Sep 13, 2009 5:55 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Bob Bratkowski is to blame.....
…..he always is. The guy is a total turd. The only explanation for him still having a job is that he has nude pics of Mike Brown and Katie.
by Andre_Smiths_Titty on Sep 13, 2009 6:03 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Blame 4 people
1. Bob Bratkowski – terrible play calling all game
2. L. Coles – 3 dropped passes - no wonder they put Henry and Caldwell in as the 2nd and 3rd receivers in the 4th qtr
3. C. Palmer – dude, he just made bad decisions and poor passes all game. His passing was rinky-dink and he couldn’t man up to make big plays in big moments - classic palmer. 0-5 in last 5 games and counting. Still overrated. We scored more points with R. Fitzpatrick, and that’s just pathetic
4. C. Benson – wow, not sure I can handle a yr of watching him plowing into the line of scrimmage for a 1/2 a yard everytime he goes between the tackles.
by Yaccub Fleishcman on Sep 13, 2009 6:05 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
it seems like he doesn't sense the pressure.
there were so many time if he just stepped up in the pocket he could have bought himself a sec or two
by featherman on Sep 13, 2009 6:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Palmer led a 96yd TD drive, scoring with less than a minute left. That is stepping up under pressure.
by R.F. Mehl on Sep 13, 2009 7:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think he meant pocket pressure. Not the pressure to win the game.
:-)
Blogger at CincyJungle.com -- SB Nation Cincinnati Bengals blog.
by Kirkendall on Sep 13, 2009 7:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was mostly referring to point 3. above about big moments.
Palmer doesn’t have the best pocket presence, but just from seeing the highlights, on the final drive, there were at least 2 plays were he moved up in the pocket to hit his check down.
by R.F. Mehl on Sep 13, 2009 8:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
RE:
Agreed. Thought his pocket presence was decent.
Blogger at CincyJungle.com -- SB Nation Cincinnati Bengals blog.
by Kirkendall on Sep 13, 2009 9:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree
the last drive showed what this offense is capable of. Palmer did indeed look great. But the previous 3.5 quarters they strugged and it seemed to me on several plays he might have avoided pressure by simply stepping foreward.
by featherman on Sep 14, 2009 7:25 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
your first two are correct. your 3rd one couldn’t be more wrong. and it’s hard to blame benson when the line wasn’t doing a very good job of opening holes.
palmer put his team in position to win yesterday, and they didn’t. how do you blame him for that?
by Raging Clue on Sep 14, 2009 9:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Defense was very good
Offense was poor.
I thought the Bengals played well enough to win and I am still feeling realy good about the offense’s (should have been winning) last drive. They came through at gut check time. The defense obviously outplayed the offense: they’re going to be fine. But the Bengals call it luck,bad execution, or bad play calling find a way to lose.
Did anyone else get a bad feeling when the refs put more time on the clock that somehow someway we were going to get screwed?
by featherman on Sep 13, 2009 6:06 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Time
Actually, my first reaction is that they fixed it. There was no reason that the refs should have dropped the clock from :38 seconds to :20 seconds. Granted, I’m not going to complain about it, but we did mention that time discrepancy in the open thread. It was weird. So then they put it back on and corrected it — at least that was what I believed at the time.
I still didn’t understand why the Bengals lost a time out for a challenge though.
Blogger at CincyJungle.com -- SB Nation Cincinnati Bengals blog.
by Kirkendall on Sep 13, 2009 6:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t think anyone could blame the defensive coordinator.
I do think Bratkowski is obsolete, and has been for at least 2 years.
We did not lose this game on the last play.
We lost it in the first half, when we did not put points up on the board, and let Denver believe they could win.
by NCC on Sep 13, 2009 6:13 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
2 years? try at least 7.
agreed on the rest.
by Raging Clue on Sep 14, 2009 9:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Coles may be a vet FA bust.
His drops were inexcusable. If he made at least 2 of those catches, no one would be saying anything about Palmer or dare I say it, even Brat. Palmers timing was fine with Chad, Henry, and Caldwell so I don’t think the rust was too much of an issue. I thought we would have seen more of B. Scott. D-fence played very well for a week 1 game.
P.S. I’m still not happy with J. Johnson and will continue to bitch about it until Pressley takes his spot.
by smoormandiddy on Sep 13, 2009 6:42 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Brat's play calling was awful. You don't run 1st and 2nd down rush b/w the tackles w/ C. Benson when he's an outside RB (his only big plays were outside the tackles)
And those long elaborate timing patterns w/ the WRs…. my god! stop it Brat! We get it, you like thinking these things thru. But you win with short quick passes in this leage and occassionally get the time to make a long play.
by Yaccub Fleishcman on Sep 13, 2009 7:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i’d still be saying stuff about brat, because i always will, because of how much he’s cost us during his tenure as offensive coordinator, but you’re right about coles yesterday. he killed a few important drives.
by Raging Clue on Sep 14, 2009 9:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
From Lance
Carson Palmer
Last 10 starts: 8 TD, 11 INT
.586 Completion %
*QB rating by game, starting with Sunday:
61.0, 80.1, 98.9, 41.3, 35.3, 121.4, 44.8, 98.7, 60.8, 51.6
*Six games with QB rating below 62
*Two multiple TD games
*Five sub 200 yard passing games
by Yaccub Fleishcman on Sep 13, 2009 7:20 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
agreed
With the disclaimer I’m stuck in Indiana and was stuck with the ticker at the bottom of the Indy/Jags game until the last minute and a half…
I agree, I can’t blame the D (from what I’ve read and seen). Yes, that catch was heartbreaking and awful, but I appreciate the agressiveness, the energy, the fact that they TRIED and kept us in the game so long. Keep it up, Bengals D.
Carson…find somebody. Just concentrate, and will the ball into the endzone.
by Rocket_Man_G on Sep 13, 2009 7:40 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The defense played very well for most of the game and them playing well was the only reason it was even possible for the game to be close. The offense never got into sync and made stupid mistakes. The play calling for the offense was just horrible, I have no idea how many times I groaned as Benson attempted to barrel through the line and get squashed for 2 yard gains on 1st/2nd down.
The offense just seemed so bland and unimaginative. I don’t expect miracles. Seemed like they were playing it fairly conservative on the passing end.
by Avatar on Sep 13, 2009 8:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
they had to play really conservatively from the passing game, because the broncos were playing their safeties about 20-30 yards deep.
by Raging Clue on Sep 14, 2009 9:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
At one point late in the third quarter I believe the Broncos were 1 for 9 on third down conversions… The Bengals D was solid and while the final play was a blown play (someone should have put a hat on Stokely as well) I don’t feel the D was to blame.
by Art_M on Sep 13, 2009 8:19 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Quote of the Night
“Just a crushing, crushing loss. I think the worst part might have been watching Kyle Orton run down the field as if he just accomplished something.”
MJD at Shutdown Corner.
/Cries again…
by IFChris on Sep 13, 2009 11:01 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Horrible loss!
Can anyone explain to me how the Bengals can lose to a rookie coach 2 years straight? Listen, I drink the koolaid like every other fan, but this loss is disturbing! The defense played lights out all game. The offense looked like el crappo again. Do I even want to get into when they lined up for the field goal, and I heard Three Stooges music playing in my head! If offense puts up any, I MEAN ANY POINTS the 3 or 4 times they were on the Broncos side of the field, GAME OVER! My point being that Marvin Lewis has lost last year to a rookie coach and QB! That was a double slap in the face! I hate to say it my friends, but we’re looking 0-3 dead in the eyes! A loss to the Broncos at home, who were supposedly in disarray( Cutler gone, Marshall acting like a crybaby). Next up Packers in Green Bay, how many of you feel confident in that one? Then the defending champs the Steelers at home. They may prove me wrong, but we are gonna lose one if not both of them! If that happens, our season is done just like last year, and Marvin Lewis has to be fired!!!!!!!!!!
by dmac1 on Sep 14, 2009 12:05 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
He probably should be… but he won’t.
If he’d at least man up and fire Brat it would be a good start.
by FriarBob on Sep 14, 2009 12:47 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i’m guessing brat is in the same boat as chris henry; marvin probably wants to get rid of him, but mikey boy won’t let him (don’t forget, brat was a holdover from the previous coaching regime).
there is no way marvin lewis should be fired. who’s going to come in here and do better?
by Raging Clue on Sep 14, 2009 9:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 


















