Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Ohio State And Florida Target 2013 Receiver Recruits

Answering the mystery of the 18 seconds added to the game clock

There's still some question about why 18 seconds was placed on the game clock in the closing seconds of the game. (I've had ten phone calls since the game ended about that question specifically) Here's the setup. With :50 left in the game, Carson Palmer took a shotgun snap and hit Andre Caldwell, who ran to the goal line and broke out. Officials downed the play at the half-yard line. The Bengals called a time out with 41 seconds left in the game. Within a few moments, the replay official decided to take a look at the play; the play was eventually upheld. First and goal at the Denver one-yard line.

Cedric Benson powered his way into the endzone for the Bengals first points in the game, which took three seconds, leaving the game clock at 38 seconds. Before the point after attempt, head official Jerome Boger announced to the clock operator that the game clock needed to be reset to twenty seconds. This is where the officials screwed up.

Star-divide

Technically, after a replay review is upheld, whatever existing clock rules apply. If the clock were to keep running without the stoppage because of the challenge/review, then the clock resumes when the play-clock resumes. If Marvin Lewis hadn't called a timeout, then yes, there would be only 20 seconds left on the game clock. However, the officials omitted Lewis' timeout, perhaps believing that Lewis' timeout was in fact a challenge, giving him the timeout back, and resumed the game clock when initiating the play-clock.

After the successful (and unnecessarily breathless) point after touchdown, officials huddled and reapplied Lewis' timeout and reset the game clock with 38 seconds left in the game. Again, no timeout by Lewis and the game clock is at 20 seconds. Timeout by Lewis, and the game clock is at 38 seconds. Got it? The latter former didn't happen so the latter applies.

What was more confusing at the time is that Boger said Cincinnati is charged with a timeout. However, he failed to make the distinction that Lewis' called timeout was before the replay. We can only assume that the officials thought Lewis called the challenge and applied the same rules outside of the two minute warning, when in fact Lewis' timeout only enabled the replay official upstairs additional time to review the play. Other than that, the timeout had nothing to do with the replay.

Now, based on Rule 4, Section 1, Article 3 of the Official NFL Rule Book, which says "game officials can correct the game clock only before the next play is run, including an untimed down or try", the officials shouldn't have been able to change the game clock once the following play was completed. Not only did they change the game clock after Benson's touchdown and before the PAT, they changed it again before the kickoff.

In the end, the officials got the game clock right and no matter what the time was, it wouldn't have changed the outcome of the game if the same sequence of plays take place -- instead of 28 seconds left, there would have been 10 seconds left on the game clock when the snap took place on that play. On the other hand, if Denver only had 10 seconds left, there would be no reason why the Bengals secondary couldn't play much deeper because the likelihood of a field goal attempt would be substantially reduced. Then again, it's not like Denver's offensive play "Have Hall tip pass into Brandon Stokley's hands" didn't work out anyway.

In truth, none of that matters. What happened, happened. I only hope we cleared up the confusion about the mysterious 18 seconds put back on the game clock.

Comment 8 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Still,

it would have been fitting for the Broncos to lose on a technicality precluding the officials from overturning a call. It’s called karma. The Bengals only have themselves to blame – but I would have preferred to have a “controversial” win under our belts rather than a heartwrenching loss.

"Ryan, Things in here don't react too well to bullets." - Marko Ramius

by TarZander on Sep 13, 2009 8:10 PM EDT reply actions  

What about that fumble

they stopped? Looked to me he had possession and a few steps. Close enough they should have at least let the play continue.

by CincyRed on Sep 13, 2009 8:23 PM EDT reply actions  

I think the Bengals are gonna get a few apologies from the league this week.

But not like it matters, team are not allowed to make apology letters public and it ultimately doesn’t effect the outcome of the game.

"Ryan, Things in here don't react too well to bullets." - Marko Ramius

by TarZander on Sep 13, 2009 8:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

goodell will never apologize to the bengals for anything.

by Raging Clue on Sep 13, 2009 9:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

The refs are precluded from changing things after a play is run...

kinda like the Cutler fumble against San Diego last year. I’m not saying it would have made a difference, but league rules state that the refs should not have been able to change the clock after two plays were run.

Besides, the Sheffler fumble is worse. That was a fumble (particularlt if the Gaffney “catch” stood up the previous play). That was truly a game altering play that nobody is talking about.

I think the Bengals lost this game more by refusing to open up their offense than anything else. Good teams make bad calls irrelevant. Unfortunately, the Bengals let the Broncos hang around for too long in the first half. If they had put some points on the board in the first half, I don’t think Orton could have let them back – fluke play or not.

"Ryan, Things in here don't react too well to bullets." - Marko Ramius

by TarZander on Sep 13, 2009 10:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

And this is why EVERY play should be able to be challenged… including called penalties. Period. No ifs, no ands, no exceptions. I don’t care if the “right” amount of time was put back on the clock or not, it was done so illegally and Marvin should have been able to challenge it. Not that I expect he would have been on the ball enough to do so… sigh

by FriarBob on Sep 14, 2009 12:42 AM EDT reply actions  

Does anyone esle think

That Caldwell should be starting in the place of Coles.

Coles seemed to be dropping 1st downs while Caldwell was making key catches.

by jim0ijk on Sep 14, 2009 3:27 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Cincinnati Bengals.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
What To Do With $60Million Dollars
Madmen_icon_small
Bengal Fans, Here's How to End Blackouts

Recent FanPosts

Small
Guard situation and AC
Small
BENGAL NATION, we are so close to being an elite team and I just hope Mike Brown listens to Marvin, Zimmer and Jay about who to sign and who to draft.
Thumbnail_small
Sign Randy Moss?
Small
Offseason plan with salary cap UPDATE 2/13/12
Small
Pre-Combine Mock Draft For the Bengals
Small
If I'm betting, here are 2 FA I can actually see us going after this offseason
Bengal-tiger-vest_small
New Mock Draft!
Thumbnail_small
DT Brandon Thompson Highlights VS WVU
Small
If MB is finally serious about winning...

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Editor-In Chief

Cj_small Josh Kirkendall

5255_133614603784_666578784_2414703_1976100_n_small Jason Garrison

Editor/Managing Editor

Rudiblanket_small Anthony Cosenza

Authors

Photo_3_small BeerRun

010511170110_small Joe Goodberry

40297_422933299865_509514865_4658259_6466915_n_small Ryan Harper

Moderators

Nfl palewook

680764146_0eac16fabd_small 80%OFTHETIMEIMRIGHTEVERYTIME

Koolaid_small UpStateMike

Bengals_stamp_by_jamaal10_small Doc Scratch