Is the Super Bowl Overrated?
I know the headline seems a bit sensationalist, but this is really concerning the Hall of Fame, and the fact that participation on Super Bowl-winning teams seems to increase the likelihood that a player will be considered worthy for induction into Canton. There are those who will think I'm just biased as a Bengals fan, and I'll admit that if we were all Patriots fans we probably wouldn't be having this sort of conversation anyway. The way it seems to me, though, is that the fact that football is the "ultimate team sport" has overshadowed the idea that the Hall of Fame is supposed to be about individual achievement, and not how that achievement relates to team success (otherwise Barry Sanders wouldn't be considered, either). Since Dr. Z got hit by strokes, there remains no sports writer that will take up the mantle of the forgotten Bengals greats, so here's my stab at it.
Let's look at the facts. First, there's the case for Ken Riley and Lemar Parrish, two great corners who played before my time, so all I can really judge from are their stats. Here's a quick quiz, though: Do you know the only player with more career interceptions than Dick LeBeau who isn't in the Hall of Fame? It's Ken Riley, with his 65 career picks making him fifth all-time, but apparently not good enough to be considered one of the best corners. Last week Geoff Hobson pointed out that Champ Bailey is one of only three corners to make eight Pro Bowls; Deion Sanders was one, Lemar Parrish the other. Care to guess which of those three players won't be in the Hall of Fame?
The cases for Ken Anderson and Isaac Curtis are equally obvious. If not for a heartbreaking loss in the Super Bowl, Kenny might already be in there; as it stands, everyone's forgotten about him. Isaac Curtis put up better numbers than Lynn Swann, but which do you hear about, Curtis's speed or Swann's ballet moves? And on that note, why shouldn't Sam Wyche be considered as a Hall of Fame coach, since the world wouldn't have the no-huddle offense without him.
Coming up, we'll watch as Jonathan Ogden and Walter Jones are lauded as the best tackles of their generation, while Willie Anderson will be left to wonder what would've happened if he'd been part of a team that didn't lose all the time.
Maybe I'm just finding new reasons to cause myself malaise, and I'm sure it's a losing battle, but I feel like keeping up the good fight for the guys who made this team fun to watch, at least at times.
0 recs |
9 comments
Comments
RE:
I think you make a legit and accurate point. The Super Bowl is the means to which these guys play and if you win them, you’ll have a much easier path to the Hall. If we looked at Big Ben’s career numbers, he’d not like be in the Hall. Now that he has two Super Bowl wins under his belt, you have to wonder if he’s already sealed enshrinement.
Blogger at CincyJungle.com -- SB Nation Cincinnati Bengals blog.
by Kirkendall on Sep 18, 2009 10:09 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
If it weren’t for his rings anybody who suggested nominating him in the first place would be laughed out of town. Much less voting for him.
But because he rode his defense to one ring and had a “miraculous” comeback against a defense that basically laid down and said “you know, we really don’t want to win after all” the second time he’s one of the great QBs of the era. Whatever.
by FriarBob on Sep 18, 2009 1:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
there were a few points i’d wanted to make about the annual bitching from either the raiders or the cowboys that the hall of fame is biased against them, but i kind of forgot to. i plead high at the time.
you're all posers. i hated bratkowski before it was cool.
by Raging Clue on Sep 18, 2009 9:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
just looking at the title, i thought to myself... mike Brown created a fanpost! sweet!
"Ghiaciuc's play was a distraction"
by firstPick on Sep 18, 2009 11:22 AM EDT reply actions 2 recs
awesome. i achieved the desired effect.
you're all posers. i hated bratkowski before it was cool.
by Raging Clue on Sep 18, 2009 9:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I initially thought the topic was the actual Super Bowl game itself over-rated...
my answer to that would be, “I don’t know. I guess i’ll have to watch it some day and let you know…”
But on your topic of Super Bowl W’s leading to HOF enshirnement, of course it is taken too much into consideration. There are 53 guys making it to the Super Bowl, not just 1 guy.
It overly affects skill position players. People will celebrate Tom Brady for leading his team to multiple Super Bowl wins…but who celebrates their Tackle Matt Light for leading them to multiple Super Bowl wins?
It’s just like the MVP award in baseball. Your team is only as good as your pitching, and you’ll only get an MVP if your team wins…therefore if you want an MVP award, you had better have good pitching on your team.
Is it fair? No, not really. Is it how the current system seems to operate? Yes.
by ephram on Sep 18, 2009 9:50 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Exposure
You don’t need a superbowl, you just need to make sure everyone knows your name. Its the Reason Chad Ocho Cinco will be HoF and Carson Palmer won’t unless the Bengals can pull out a superbowl win.
by Kenny of the Jungle on Sep 21, 2009 6:09 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
great point. i guess this is kind of what i was saying in an indirect way.
you're all posers. i hated bratkowski before it was cool.
by Raging Clue on Sep 22, 2009 8:36 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 















