Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Notre Dame's Turnaround: How Have The Irish Done It?

Interview: Brandon from Acme Packing Company drops by to talk about the Green Bay Packers

The last time the Green Bay Packers hosted the Cincinnati Bengals in the regular season was December 3, 1995; the Bengals lost 24-10 amassing 217 yards of total offense, the Packers dominated with 23 first downs, 434 yards total; Favre alone passed for 339 yards and three scores. An old favorite, Harold Green, led the Bengals with 20 yards rushing. Ouch.

Want to know the last time the Bengals beat the Packers at Green Bay during the regular season? Well, never. The Bengals won twice in Milwaukee, but not Green Bay. So something very historic could happen this Sunday. Hopefully it won't be business as usual where we allow the embarrassing trends of losing to continue.

In the mean time, time for school.

Brandon runs the SB Nation blog for the Green Bay Packers, the Acme Packing Company. He was kind enough to sit down with us for a few moments.

Star-divide

The Packers reportedly converted their defense to a base 3-4. In the first game of the season, the defense picked off Jay Cutler four times. Do you believe that the interceptions were a result of the new defense?
I'm a believer in defensive players, not defensive schemes. Dom Capers dialed up a lot of different looks to bring pressure, but the pass rush was aided by the return of DE Cullen Jenkins (injured for most of 2008) and rookie LB Clay Matthews. QB Jay Cutler was very uncomfortable in the pocket during the 1st half, but he certainly was wound up in his first game as a Bear.

Situation is fourth and goal at the three-yard line, Packers have the ball and are down by four points with two seconds left in the game. Who wins the football game for the Packers?
In the past, I would have looked for a quick pass to either WR Greg Jennings or WR Donald Driver right at the goal line. But another player who might be called on is 2nd year TE Jermichael Finley, who's 6'5" 247 lbs. but can be lined up as a wide receiver to create a mismatch.

In 2007, Ryan Grant had 11 rushes of 20 yards or more and finished with a 5.1 yard-per-rush average. He followed that up with only six 20-yard rushes and a 3.9 yards-per-rush average in 2008.
Everyone is giving Grant a pass on 2008 since he played through a hamstring injury for the first half of the season. And he was much better in the final few games, but he was never the guy he was in 2007. He looked good on Sunday, but I think 2007 was his breakout season.

The Bengals just scored a touchdown. They are still down by two points and need to convert a two-point conversion with no time remaining in regulation. Who do you bank on the most to make a play on defense to win the game?
CB Charles Woodson. He's lost some speed and has trouble keeping up on deep sideline routes, but on short yardage plays, he's the smartest player on defense and can jump a quick route as good as anyone.

There’s a growing feeling that the Bengals might be able to put together a pass rush that’s vastly improved over last year’s 17-sack season. Two defensive ends accounted for three quarterback sacks last week against the Denver Broncos. Give us an assessment on how well your pass protection is.
The pass protection was the Packers problem last Sunday. 3rd year OL Allen Barbre had his first NFL start and allowed two sacks to DE Adewale Ogunleye in the first half. The Bears also recorded a safety on a blitz to Barbre's side. Although he played better in the 2nd half, the game was a disaster for him. QB Aaron Rodgers's timing was off after he realized he couldn't count on his strong side pass protection, and the entire offense was disrupted. If the Bengals can bring a strong side speed rush, that will be the main focus of the pass rush attack.

For the most part, we have a young and inexperienced offensive line who gave up two sacks against the Broncos (Bengals gave up three sacks, the third attributed to a running back). How would you characterize your pass rush and who should Bengals fans look out for the most?
Back to #1 above. Although I believe it's about the players on defense, the Packers pass rush is one of those designed to give inexperienced lineman nightmares. They played a 2-4-5 scheme most of the game, DE Jenkins and DE Jolly in the middle, and LB Matthews and Kampman often at the line as ends. But Capers loves the zone blitz, and he'll drop his big men back in coverage, and then corner blitz, any of the linebackers blitz, or safety blitz. The rush can come from anywhere and guys will be lined up all over.

Comment 13 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Bengals + 9.5?

Maybe i’m just on the kool-aid but when I see that large of a spread in an NFL game I’m tempted to take it. I think the Bengals D has shown me enough that I think they can at least slow the packers pass offense and keep it close.

Any thoughts?

by CincyMike56 on Sep 18, 2009 11:38 AM EDT reply actions  

I don't get this either

Are the Packers that good or the Bengals that bad?
If the Packers cover the spread we are in trouble this year

by featherman on Sep 18, 2009 12:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well our offense DID suck last week, nay was even worse than that — at least at putting points on the board. I think the only reason the spread isn’t larger is that the GB OL was so bad last weekend and our D looks at least decent.

So I figure the spread is about right… for betting purposes at least. I don’t think we will lose by anywhere near 9 points tho. We’ll either get blown out very badly or we’ll cover that spread (at the very least). Depends on whether our O can actually score this weekend or not.

by FriarBob on Sep 18, 2009 1:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

holy crap, take the bengals to cover...

either this is bordering on absurdity, or i am chugging gallons of kool-aid…

by GrooveLeg on Sep 18, 2009 4:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

Spreads

The spreads are based on the action. Most of the money is going for GB so the the spread is higher. GB has a winning tradition and a national presence which drives the money that way.

by StLBengal on Sep 19, 2009 10:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

These columns

I love these opposing-team interview columns. The questions are intelligent and the answers are well-reasoned, and they give football-knowledgable Bengal fans some things to look for in the other team that we otherwise might not be aware of. Keep ’em up!

by Todd G on Sep 18, 2009 12:46 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

and so say all of us!

you're all posers. i hated bratkowski before it was cool.

by Raging Clue on Sep 18, 2009 9:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

I like the idea of going against a B grade, Dom Capers-Packers, version of the Steelers zone blitz. As said in the interview, the zone blitz is designed to give an inexperience line fits, but we play the Steelers and Ravens twice each year and I think we are more prepared than most teams for such an attack.
With a step down in personal and game planning ingenuity(Capers<<Lebeau), I think we have a chance to make some big plays against an aggressive defense.

by R.F. Mehl on Sep 18, 2009 3:08 PM EDT reply actions  

Whitworth

kept heat off Palmer from the left side pretty much all game long against Denver; I have faith in his ability to do the same against GB. I’ll wait for the proof of the pudding before saying anything similar about the right side of the line.

by Mr. X on Sep 18, 2009 7:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

isnt it funny how every team thinks they can confuse our "young inexpirienced offensive line" ?

i mean, we do play the steelers and ravens 4 times a season. What can these teams throw at us that our Division foes cant?

"Ghiaciuc's play was a distraction"

by Joe Goodberry on Sep 19, 2009 9:07 AM EDT reply actions  

3-4 is new in G B

This 3-4 D is new to a lot of the players in G B. To me I think this is a disadvantage to them. I know that they are pro football players but until they play together for a while in this new D (to them) , I see them struggling against a O, that is use to playing against a 3-4. I think we can confuse their D.

by WHYUS!! on Sep 19, 2009 10:09 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Cincinnati Bengals.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
What To Do With $60Million Dollars
Madmen_icon_small
Bengal Fans, Here's How to End Blackouts
Small
T-Cha's New Depth Mock Draft

Recent FanPosts

Small
T-Cha's Full Analysis and In-Depth Research Dissecting The Bengals
Small
Please go get Mario Williams Mike Brown!!!!!
Crucifixionbytheophanesthecretan_small
What positions do NFL teams really value? (Running Backs?)
33081-m_small
Curveball strategy
Small
Hello Again!
Picture_059_small
Filling holes in the roster: Guard
Thumbnail_small
Bengal4ever Mock / FA
Small
Is it possible to eliminate all the headaches while upgrading the roster?
Small
Is the best defense a good offense?
Small
If I could build the 2012 Bengals roster

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Editor-In Chief

Cj_small Josh Kirkendall

5255_133614603784_666578784_2414703_1976100_n_small Jason Garrison

Editor/Managing Editor

Rudiblanket_small Anthony Cosenza

Authors

Photo_3_small BeerRun

010511170110_small Joe Goodberry

40297_422933299865_509514865_4658259_6466915_n_small Ryan Harper

Moderators

Nfl palewook

680764146_0eac16fabd_small 80%OFTHETIMEIMRIGHTEVERYTIME

Koolaid_small UpStateMike

Bengals_stamp_by_jamaal10_small Doc Scratch