Bengals long snapper Brad St. Louis gets "C'mon man" from Cincy Jungle
Yep. I'm ripping off ESPN. Hey, they do it to us bloggers all of the time.
A growing concern -- well, it's so big we're not sure it's growing anymore -- is why the team's long snapper isn't, you know, long snapping. With 1:51 left in the first quarter, St. Louis snapped the football behind Kevin Huber's right ear. The football started trickling away towards midfield when one of the Broncos defenders tried to pick it up. Shayne Graham had none of that, dropped the boom on the defender, who couldn't secure the football. Another Bronco defender was about to fall on the football when Kevin Huber pushed him aside and secured the football.
All of that because St. Louis failed to do the one thing that he's getting paid $745,000 to do.
Against the Steelers, the Bengals had just scored a touchdown on Johnathan Joseph's interception return. It wasn't even close. Hell, it might hit the video board at the new Dallas Cowboys stadium. Graham simply pounced on the football and, like the rest of us, curled up in a cradle position. The irony here is that the missed snap could have actually put the Bengals in a position to win. If the PAT is made, then the Bengals could have gone with a more conservative approach late in the game and settled for a game-tying field goal (they wouldn't have gone for the first two-point conversion which failed), rather than the necessary touchdown. Hey. You guys know me. I'll spin anything into a positive. It's my required community service for my sentence of being a Bengals fan throughout the 90s.
Every snap that St. Louis was asked to do after missing the PAT, lowered my white blood cell count. I took off work today. I'm very sick. To say that I won't get nervous on every snap from this point on, is a lie. How does Marvin Lewis feel about it?
"Brad has to perform better in that situation. We’re very confident with Brad, and he has done an excellent job for a long time. Brad doesn’t have missed snaps in practice. For whatever reason, they’ve shown up in the game. We have to go back and stay confident and execute. Go back fundamentally and do a good job with his technique, and what’s he’s doing and be accurate with the snap."
In truth, neither bad snap directly led to the team losing a football game. However, there's no way anyone can have any faith in St. Louis right now, especially when the team is about to convert a game-winning field goal, or a game-tying PAT (see Denver, 2006). If his name isn't brought up again for the rest of the season, then great. If he bobbles another snap, how in the world can the Bengals justify keeping him on this squad? He's paid $745,000, which is nearly $200,000 more than Andre Caldwell, to do one thing. Are you kidding me? C'mon, man (sorry, watching Monday Night football's pregame show).
0 recs |
10 comments
|
Comments
you know who was worse?
chad doing the pregame show. no charisma at all.
by brandone on Sep 28, 2009 8:41 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
to me, the highlight of brad st. louis’ career came in a “mayne event” segment about 5 years ago when we were playing the rams; they had isaac bruce and torry holt wearing fake beards, and made the statement “anytime brad st. louis comes to town, we don’t shave that week. also, we wear fake beards.” i thank brad st. louis for being part of that comic genius. but he still needs to be cut yesterday.
you're all posers. i hated bratkowski before it was cool.
by Raging Clue on Sep 28, 2009 10:45 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
It's only a matter of time.
Before St. Louis costs us a game again with a bad snap. Not only has he had two snaps go over Huber’s head this season, but he has also had two high snaps that Huber had to go up and bring down in time. It’s clear he has a mental issue ever since that Denver game in ‘06, and it’s just getting worse. I’m sorry to say but he does need to be replaced.
It’s like a pitcher who can’t throw a strike anymore, Rick Ankiel comes to mind, they just can’t rise to the challenge and physce themselves out.
by St. Esiason on Sep 28, 2009 11:39 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Long Is Right
St Louis’s snaps are really long, very high, and just a bit outside. He will not only cost us games, but many fans due to heart attacks.
by laibach on Sep 29, 2009 12:03 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Needs to be cut
I talked to several fans after the game on Sunday and everybody wants this guy gone. He has one job to do and he can’t do it. Surely we can find somebody who can. 1 time in a season is understandable I guess… I mean, everybody has their days. But twice in three games? Cmon man!!!!
by WhoDeyDerek on Sep 29, 2009 12:44 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Rick Ankiel
He couldn’t hack it as a pitcher, but he’s turned into one hell of an outfielder.
as for St. Louis, I think he needs to go. We can sign a guy for half of what we pay him to long snap, hell I think Coats has at least LS’ed in practice, he can’t be any worse.
by Danimal, Destroyer of Worlds on Sep 29, 2009 12:46 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I just keep saying...
…that I don’t understand why the Bengals are using The Fifty-Third Roster Spot for a long snapper. It’s not about Brad, really, or his recent spate of miscues, but rather…why don’t the Bengals make the backup center perform long-snapper duties on special teams? Would free up a spot for, say, another fullback?
by TheWalrus1971 on Sep 29, 2009 1:48 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I concur
That having someone besides JJ at fullback would be awesome
by Danimal, Destroyer of Worlds on Sep 29, 2009 11:43 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 



















