Should we take anything from the team's rushing offense against the Colts; great foundation for rebuilt rushing offense?
On the stat sheet, it was impressive. On 43 attempts the Bengals offense recorded 296 yards rushing -- a staggering 6.9 yards-per-rush team average. Three different running backs recorded 50 yards or more and all five finished with an average of five yards per rush. Leonard, Scott and Benson recorded at least 23 yards on a single rush attempt. Impressive that might seem, is it wise to adjust and finalize the roster based on this performance? Were any questions answered or were they prolonged? The Colts started two regular starters; so the first team Bengals offense was already playing a backup defense. On the other hand, the Bengals offense started swapping in backup players by the next offensive possession against a defense that averaged 124 yards rushing allowed per game heading into the preseason finale.
As for the season, the Bengals rushed for more than four-yards per attempt through their last three games, recording seven first downs or more on the ground. Here's the game-by-game breakdown.
| @ NO | @ NE | STL | INDY | |
| Yards Rushing | 90 | 173 | 141 | 296 |
| Attempts | 27 | 35 | 32 | 43 |
| Yards/Att | 3.3 | 4.9 | 4.4 | 6.9 |
| First Downs | 3 | 7 | 9 | 16 |
| Touchdowns | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
There were periods that the rushing offense struggled early; for the most part, they played well, thanks to a rebuilt offensive line. To further breakdown the performance, the following shows how the Bengals rushing offense did in the first half, when the starters played (though not the entire half in most instances) of each preseason game.
| @ NO | @ NE | STL | INDY | |
| Yards Rushing | 61 | 49 | 54 | 168 |
| Attempts | 16 | 17 | 14 | 17 |
| Yards/Att | 3.8 | 2.9 | 3.9 | 9.9 |
| First Downs | 2 | 3 | 5 | 10 |
| Touchdowns | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
The secondary question, after examining the team's effort rushing the ball, is the makeup of the personnel. If the battle is between Bernard Scott and DeDe Dorsey, two backs with similar running styles, then I would guess it would be Scott's. Leonard and Dorsey, it gets muddy. However, I would image in the Bengals would elect a tougher runner between the tackles in the AFC North. Then there's always the prevailing, "what if" the Bengals take four running backs. If that's the case, discussion is over. They take four. Nothing left to talk about.
| @ NO | @ NE | STL | INDY | |
| Cedric Benson | 8-28 | 10-28 | 5-17 | 2-35 |
| Bernard Scott | 6-20 | 5-6 | 8-54 | 5-43 |
| Brian Leonard | 6-10 | 7-34 | 4-6-1 | 9-64-1 |
| DeDe Dorsey | 3-5 | 4-60 | 4-22 | 13-68 |
| James Johnson | -- | 4-22 | 8-25 | 11-55 |
The first number is rushing attempts. The second is yards rushing and the third is touchdowns scored.
Along with an offensive line that could struggle early with so many new pieces from this time a year ago, I believe the Bengals have a good building block for their entire rushing offense. However, I'm not sure if the Bengals should really use the game against Indianapolis as a means to finalize the roster. If questions remained about the position heading into the game, then those questions likely remain. It seemed to me anyone could have rushed well Thursday night. And it's not like anyone struggled. But like I said, while the choice will be difficult for the coaches, I believe we should be encouraged by the foundation this team is setting for the rushing offense.
0 recs |
20 comments
|
Comments
Great post
The game was interesting from an RB point of view. dorsey and Leonard got a bunch of carries and a bunch of yards. Yet I cant help but note the speed with which Scott pulled around the line of scrimmage when he broke that 26 yarder. that was ridiculous. I though he would get strung out to the end of the field but before I knew it he was bursting down the side and picking up major speed really fast.
Tough situation for the coaches…
Go read a book!
by N8lol on Sep 4, 2009 11:12 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
They may keep 6 initialy
then see whats up after they have to make a roster spot for Smith
by featherman on Sep 4, 2009 11:15 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
i think i read that James Johnson had a 40 yard TD run negated by a holding call on Quan Cosby.
So in my mind, we had 336 yards rushing, and we won 45-7………….just kidding, sorry not funny.
Dude, that Leapin Leonard sure is somethin ain’t he? If both Leonard and Coffman leap safeties in the same game at any point this season….well, it would be sick.
WhoDey
3 yards and a pile of dust
by Hudepohl Dey on Sep 4, 2009 11:40 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I don't expect to see much from Coffman this year.
Maybe next year.
by smoormandiddy on Sep 4, 2009 12:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
We'll see him
as long as we don’t bring in another TE.
This is our year!
by Carsonorbust on Sep 4, 2009 1:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That might not be a good thing
I would much rather see an experienced yet sign a 1 year min deal than to have a rookie shoved out on the field before he is ready to contribute. Things like that can cause us to lose our QB to injury again.
by smoormandiddy on Sep 4, 2009 1:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i think coffman is ready to contribute, if kept to a third-down or second-and-long situation.
by Raging Clue on Sep 5, 2009 7:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dede
First of all, I know that there are a lot of bloggers out there who are worried about this guy’s durability. It’s a really valid concern, but I’m liking this guy more every time he steps on the field. This article didn’t even mention the fact that the Dorsey blocked a punt last night (yes I know that it came against the scurbs). This guy has talent though. Just two years ago, he blocked a punt in the regular season as well.
On November 18, 2007, in a game against the Arizona Cardinals, he blocked Mike Barr’s punt in third quarter and returned it 19 yards for a touchdown.
*Wikipedia
I’m all for keeping four RBs given that both Leonard and Dorsey have some special teams value.
This is our year!
by Carsonorbust on Sep 4, 2009 1:40 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
All four as in Benson, Scott, Leonard and Dorsey
This is our year!
by Carsonorbust on Sep 4, 2009 1:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Who needs Andre Smith
Is it too late to cut him?
by Evil Monkey on Sep 4, 2009 2:23 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
lol, that’s an expensive cut, but I like your gumption. Bold move sir
This is our year!
by Carsonorbust on Sep 4, 2009 2:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Just a thought
What if this happens? The Bengals keep all for running backs. One fullback (put 2 of them on the practice squad. Keep three tight ends with Coats used in certain situations as the fullback. If Johnson (if he is on the squad) is unable to perform you would have Coats and you could call up One of the fullbacks from the practice squad.
by Bengal John on Sep 4, 2009 2:41 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
not a bad idea by any means
atleast keep 4 running backs while smith is not on the 53.
by nadfflictar on Sep 4, 2009 3:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The thing is...
Fui and Pressley are both good enough that they’d get plucked off the practice squad by some other team and put on their active roster. Now, I hold that if the Bengals put Jeremi on the practice squad, he stays there for a good while until they need him again.
Benson, Leonard, Scott, Vakapuna, Pressley.
Done.
by TheWalrus1971 on Sep 4, 2009 3:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Jeremi can’t go on the PS.
I would go 2 FB (Johnson and Pressly), 2 TE (Coats, Coffman) and 4 RBs. Then hope Fui stays on the PS. I don’t think we should keep 3 rookies as key blockers. I think that putting Leonard and Scott or Dorsey on the field on thrid down would generate interesting problems for the D.
by jim0ijk on Sep 4, 2009 10:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I wouldn’t read too much into it. The Colts are always horrible in preseason, it doesn’t mean anything.
by indesignkat on Sep 4, 2009 8:18 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
it’s not a tremendous portent, because it’s preseason, but 297 yards is still pretty spectacular. let’s do that against denver.
by Raging Clue on Sep 5, 2009 7:23 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 


















