Mike Zimmer: Would Like To See More Passion From Carlos Dunlap
Cincinnati's defense has grown a lot during the past few seasons, cumulating into a powerhouse defense that ranked fourth in the NFL last year. Consider this. The Bengals allowed 276 first downs last year, the lowest first downs allowed dating back to Cincinnati's last Super Bowl appearance. Furthermore, they allowed less than 300 points for the first since 1989, less than 20 passing touchdowns for the first time since 1988 and the team's 4,822 yards allowed is the first sub-5,000 yards allowed in a full season since Dick LeBeau's ninth ranked defense in 2001. I feel like a parent, to be honest, watching this defense grow, wiping a tear from me eye.
But they're not perfect. Not by a long shot. Aside from actually appearing to regress this year, one of the very few things that just hasn't stabilized is their ability to get to the quarterback. But even that expression comes with hesitation. Last year the Bengals recorded 34 quarterback sacks, which ranked 16th in the league. They doubled the production over the 2008 defense, which barely averaged a sack per game, falling three sacks short of the highest sack total during Marvin Lewis' tenure.
Yet, sacks are still a problem (admittedly, I totally giggled when I wrote that).
Pressure is more than just a numbers game. Even though a defensive player may not get a sack, constant pressure forces an opposing quarterback to throw the football before his receiver's route is completed. It also forces the quarterback's technique to deteriorate, causing a thrown duck to be shot down, thanking the gods because if that damned dog laughs at me one more time...
After a fast start pressuring the quarterback, building on the numbers game, Cincinnati's ability to get to the quarterback slowly, and noticeably, diminished. It became such a problem that over the offseason, one of the constant answers to what this team needs to improve upon, was pressuring the quarterback. For as good as Leon Hall and Johnathan Joseph have become, the Bengals will still need to pressure the quarterback to limit the pressure on our cornerbacks.
One of their solutions was Florida Gators defensive end, Carlos Dunlap, selected in the second round with their 54th overall pick. The original plan was to play Dunlap as a defensive end opposite of Antwan Odom on third downs, eventually becoming an inside pass rusher on obvious passing downs.
Yet, his progress has been slow. After missing the first two games this season with a knee strain, Dunlap made his NFL debut against the Carolina Panthers, even pressuring Jimmy Clausen once. After that, Dunlap subsequently was listed as inactive against the Browns and Buccaneers.
So why is he inactive?
Simply put: He's impressing no one during practice. According to Mothership Captain Geoff Hobson, Mike Zimmer would "like to see more passion in practice."
The Bengals are one of only four teams in the NFL with six quarterback sacks or less and only one NFL team has less than six (Tampa Bay). With Odom out for at least four games, one has to figure that Dunlap will get his chance now. First things first. Impress the coaches in practice and, you know, actually get on the field.
13 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Sunday's game
I would love to see the Bengals throw it back to 2009 this weekend and just pound the rock down ATL’s throat. One thing I always hang my hat on, especially in these interconference matchups, is that if we can come out and play smash mouth AFC North style football, it can be a huge advantage for the Bengals. Pound the rock, control the clock, and VOILA!…Suddenly our pass rush gets a lot better when the D-line can pin their ears back and rush Matty Ice w/ a lead.
by CincyBengals4life on Oct 21, 2010 10:01 PM EDT reply actions
Because Carson Palmer right now is a below average passer
He almost had 5 interceptions against Carolina.
by sgiridharan1982 on Oct 21, 2010 11:06 PM EDT up reply actions
Has nothing to do w/ Carson or the Falcons. It’s about us. Last season Ced rushed for over 100 yds TWICE on big, bad Baltimore. If they want to make something of this season they need to start inposing their will on teams. AFC North football!
by CincyBengals4life on Oct 22, 2010 8:50 AM EDT up reply actions
What do you expect from a rookie?
If you want to be hard on Dunlap, Bengals are getting nowhere close to what they pay for services of Andre Smith. If one is to measure output performance required by the amount each player is getting paid, the much cheaper offensive front line (except Andre Smith) has definitely outperformed the defensive line.
I expect a 2nd round pick to contribute
Especially with the talent in the 2010 draft. I’m not giving up on Dunlap. I wasnt crazy about the pick, but the guy no doubt has some upside. Very dissapointed that he cant play his way on to the field but not altogether suprised. There’s a reason why a guy with 1st round talent was available in the latter part of rd 2.
Don't we have to see him in order to see something out of him?
Get the guy on the field, if he stinks then get rid of him. We can’t keep wasting roster spots on guys who are not helping the team, especially Jerome Simpson. If the guy can’t do anything in 2 1/2 years what makes you think that he is ever going to? They either have it or they don’t. We need depth…
It ain't easy being greasy...
Why would you reward a guy who is slacking off in practice by letting him play on Sunday’s? With all the talk of our team being undisciplined and underacheiving, I don’t think that would be a wise move for the coached to make.
by smoormandiddy on Oct 22, 2010 6:51 AM EDT up reply actions
With all due respect
I have to disagree. This isn’t high school. He needs to be put out there, at least on passing downs, and lets see what he can do. There are plenty of talented players who slack in practice. Its not right, but sitting someone who can do better than the other guy while paying him is counterproductive. Maybe if he saw some success on the field and got a chance to show what he can do, the work ethic will come with it so he can earn those bonuses. He is getting paid either way, why not see if he can contribute? I just don’t want this guy to become another Jerome, taking up a spot and making a bunch of money to do jack.
I understand what you are saying...
This isn’t college, we have to be able to get something out of him, and every roster spot is vital. If he wasn’t showing the coaching staff anything, then he shouldn’t have made the team in the first place. That is what we have training camp for.
It ain't easy being greasy...
I would like to see more passion out of all of our players... and coaches.
The NFL is a tuxedo and the Bengals are a pair of brown shoes.
"If we always agree, one of us is not necessary"
Not about Reward and Punishment
At this level it’s not always about “letting” a guy play. It’s about utilizing your assets. There are reasons to be careful about what carries over or doesn’t carry over from practice to the game but there have always been players that weren’t the best practice players yet performed well in games. Reward and punishment has to be a factor to maintain discipline but it would be neither my sole nor principle consideration.
These aren’t grade-school kids. If you invest in talent, you need to see if the talent can get it done where it counts – in the games. You can always work on pounding practice intensity out of the guy and the lack of it may eventually curtail the guy’s career, but now you lack results in the game and you need to see who can get them. Like D-Day said, put him out there and if he stinks, get rid of him. Then you can really rub his poor practice habits in his face and you won’t be cutting your nose off to spite your face.
by fletchersmith on Oct 22, 2010 11:40 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs

by 
























