Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Devils Beat Rangers, Head To Stanley Cup Finals

Bengals Defensive Ends Have To Step Up In Passing Defense

Quarterbacks are rare creatures, born early in the 20th century. With no natural defense, the quarterback is surrounded by a wall of offensive linemen from the Footballous Offensiveous Felidae, a cousin of the quarterback. Coming in a variety of packages ranging from gun-slingers to timing-slingers, quarterbacks are big or small, fast or slow. They are naturally smart or only as good as the system they play in. They are game managers or, in the case of the rarer elite quarterbacks, game winners. And in Cincinnati's case recently, opposing quarterbacks generally leave the game with clean shirts and positive attitudes.

The Bengals defense, the most disappointing unit by far this season, is enjoying an innocent journey towards inconsistent pass defense against opposing quarterbacks. Thanks to a defense that ranks inside the top-ten with eight interceptions, the Bengals pass defense ranks 12th in the league with opposing quarterbacks generating a passer rating of 77.8. All things considered, save for performances against Tom Brady and Matt Ryan, the Bengals pass defense has generated just enough resistance to keep opposing quarterbacks from exploding. Then again, as the more angry Bengals fan will point out, the games that Cincinnati's pass defense played well against are Joe Flacco (which the Bengals have always kept in check), Jimmy Clausen (during his first NFL start), Seneca Wallace (a career backup quarterback) and Josh Freeman (a promising young quarterback in his second year). And successes by Seneca Wallace, Josh Freeman and Matt Ryan is causing concern.

Player COMP ATT CMP% Yards TDs INTs Rating
Tom Brady 25 35 71% 258 3 0 120.9
Joe Flacco 17 39 44% 154 1 4 23.8
Jimmy Clausen 16 33 48% 188 0 1 53.6
Seneca Wallace 18 30 60% 184 1 1 74.9
Josh Freeman 20 33 61% 280 1 1 85.4
Matt Ryan 24 33 73% 299 3 1 118.1

You could point to the team's pass rush as our primary suspect. No, not could. You should. With only six quarterback sacks this year, the Bengals defense ranks behind six NFL players who have more sacks. If you specifically pointed to the Bengals defensive front, which only has two quarterback sacks this year, then you'd be totally frustrated to learn that 54 NFL players have recorded more quarterback sacks than the Bengals front four. Only one team, the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, has generated less quarterback sacks than the Bengals.

According to NFL.com's Game Books, which charts how many times a quarterback gets hit and who made the hit, seven defensive linemen account for 18 quarterback hits through six games. And four of those hits came from Frostee Rucker against the Atlanta Falcons.

Let's specifically talk about the team's defensive ends.

Robert Geathers, who has yet to record a quarterback sack, has hit the quarterback three times and never more than once in any game. Geathers, generally considered the team's best rushing defender amongst defensive ends, signed a six-year contract worth $33.75 million after a 10.5-sack season in 2006. Since then, he's recorded 9.5 quarterback sacks in the 48 games since signing and scheduled to earn $3.25 million in 2010, $3.95 million in 2011 and $4.2 million in 2012 in base salary. Good rush defender or not, the Bengals need him to be far more disruptive in the passing game.

Antwan Odom has only played four games this year, due to injury and a suspension for violating the league's drug policy, and his contribution to the team's defense has resulted in zero quarterback sacks, zero hits on the quarterback and four total tackles. Already in his third year, Odom has only played in 22 of a possible 38 games, never playing a full season with Cincinnati. Odom signed a five-year deal worth $29.5 million in March of 2008, scheduled to earn $3.4 million in 2010, $4.5 million in 2011 and $5.3 million in 2012 in base salary. While Odom's 11 quarterback sacks in 22 games seems reasonable, five came against the Green Bay Packers in 2009. So that leaves six quarterback sacks in the remaining 21 games; not so reasonable.

That's $6.65 million for two defensive ends that's combined for zero quarterback sacks, three quarterback hits and 21 tackles through six games in 2010.

Michael Johnson could arguably be more disappointing, based more on the more hopeful side of expectations. After recording a quarterback hit and 0.5 quarterback sacks against the Baltimore Ravens, Johnson's playing time has actually decreased to the point that rookie Carlos Dunlap, who has been inactive in four games this year, had more snaps on defense against the Atlanta Falcons.

The team's leading pass rusher, Frostee Rucker, still only with one sack, but a team-leading six shots on the quarterback.

  Sacks Quarterback Hits
Frostee Rucker 1 6
Robert Geathers 0 3
Michael Johnson 0.5 1
Antwan Odom 0 0

With Leon Hall and Johnathan Joseph dealing with their respective injuries, with the team's safeties generalized as anything but coverage experts, the Bengals inability to get to the quarterback is a significant reason of the team's defensive struggles. And you could point directly at the team's awful defensive end performances.

Comment 16 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

i'm going to attack the head of the snake on this problem

1) it starts with the scouting department. the bengals tend to fail in drafting any successful pass rushers under mike brown, ever.

Alfred Williams would be the only exception to that rule. Yet Alfred brings up issue two in this multifaceted problem.

2) the bengals fail to retain or secure quality free agents under mike brown. saving pennies can cost you dollars sometimes. how’s the bargain busting medical staff savings working out.

3) are the d-line coaches getting the job done in 2010? hard to say. yet are we to believe the same players who could generate pressure in 2009, now lack the ability to generate any pressure in 2010?

"wherever Brad St. Louis is and Shayne Graham is about to be." -R.F. Mehl

by palewook on Oct 30, 2010 3:41 PM EDT reply actions  

maybe it isnt the defense

Maybe we should be blaming our lack of offense. Lack of offense leads to the defense being stuck on the field a lot more.Maybe if the offense can manage to score more than 3 points in a half we wouldn’t be putting so much pressure on the defense.
The defense got us back in the game last week. with a int and a fumble recovery for 6.
The offense then manages to miss a wide open T.O. and then next play Benson fumbles.

Last season we ran the ball and ran our way into the playoffs.This season it’s pass first and run second.which has led to many more three and outs.
More three and outs put our defense behind the eight ball.Our defense is just not good enough to bail the team out week after week.
Good defense for us start with good offense.

by Yarin on Oct 30, 2010 3:44 PM EDT reply actions  

If the offense put the defense out on the field more you'd think just by the fact they are out there so long

that they’d get more QB hits.

However, that doesn’t happen. And it has nothing to do w/ the offense. The D sucks. Flat out sucks. Outside of the Carolina game, when they don’t force a turnover teams have no problem moving the ball against them.

How will Chris Carpenter explain this to his children?

by Grizzlyfox on Oct 30, 2010 5:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm pretty sure our our average time of possession this year is still over half the game

not certain of the exact minutes, but I remember after the first four games, we were ranked in the top 5.

Moisture is the essense of wetness, and wetness is the essense of beauty.

by Blue Steel on Oct 31, 2010 9:28 AM EDT up reply actions  

Who's our Dline coach and

How long has he been here. Maybe this problem lies with him. Year after year we have a problem with the Dline except when we get someone new. That someone usually is a beast the first year(Smith, Geathers, Odom 2nd year can be considered 1st). A few more can be added to the list.
Seems to me that there might be a problem with the coaching and the way they are teaching to pass-rush, like get off the line and beat the Oline by using their hands, spinning and all little things that can make a difference.
I know different coaches have different styles of coaching and just maybe these players just aren’t taking to the style of coaching/pass-rush techniques being taught. This happens a lot with players. They force the players to do it the coaches way and not the players own style.
Just a thought..

by WHYUS!! on Oct 30, 2010 4:45 PM EDT reply actions  

Jay Hayes

from bengals.com

“Jay Hayes, a 22-year veteran of major college and NFL coaching, is in his eighth season as Bengals defensive line coach. Despite several significant injuries, his 2009 line helped the Bengals to a No. 4 NFL finish in fewest yards allowed (301.4/game), the team’s best rank since 1983. Also last season, the Bengals ranked sixth in the NFL in scoring defense (18.2). It was the second-highest defensive scoring rank in franchise history. "

"wherever Brad St. Louis is and Shayne Graham is about to be." -R.F. Mehl

by palewook on Oct 30, 2010 7:43 PM EDT reply actions  

If any of you have a buckeye preference

Come join our Live Blog, it’s now up! http://bit.ly/dqzVi6

Visit Inside The Shoe
The Buckeye blog for every fan!

by Ian_InsideTheShoe on Oct 30, 2010 7:48 PM EDT reply actions  

My 1 2 3"s

Reasons we lose…
1) overall discipline (get team meeting crankin)
2) O and D line play
3) Bratworst O play calling
Reasons we can and will win.
1) Talent
2) Team Unity…it was there last year
3) Who dey Nation and special teams…

Ok 3 was hard but if lineman can get it together it will get interesting. Keep it up fat boy. Plus our schedule seems to be lightening up compared to how it looked at beginning. If we win two in a row tell me why we can’t win…. Browns beat the Saints. Cmon Quan!!!!!

by quickslant on Oct 30, 2010 11:33 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

Get rid of Odom and Geathers with their salaries

and switch to a 3-4. If they aren’t going to rush the passer, then we may as well replace them with another run stuffer and freak passrusher who can throw off the offense by dropping back into coverage. I think it’s easier to produce LB’s than it is linemen anyways.

Moisture is the essense of wetness, and wetness is the essense of beauty.

by Blue Steel on Oct 31, 2010 9:34 AM EDT reply actions  

Michael Johnson is the perfect 3-4 hybrid LB.

But I’m not so sure about the rest of the defense’s ability to play 3-4. We don’t really have a good NT, which is the biggest issue. A dominant DT is hard to come by and you need one to run the 3-4 well.

Win a ring without the king! Cavs=2011 champs?

by sexsalad on Oct 31, 2010 10:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yea, I've had this discussion several times already

first of all, I’m not really big on MJ. I don’t think he plays well against the run and would be a liability in that regard. Only way I see him working out on a 3-4 is as a weak side, pass-rushing LB (similar to Clay Matthews). So, I think we’d definitely have to pick up a Harrison/Ware type build of a LB to complete that – one who can bruise around in the trenches.

I think Atkins and Fanene would be ideal 3-4 DE’s with Rucker as a backup. Then place Peko at NT who is the same height/weight as Hampton & Wilfork with Sims backing him up. If we can find a bigger NT, then great, shift Peko over to DE with Atkins on the other side.

Moisture is the essense of wetness, and wetness is the essense of beauty.

by Blue Steel on Oct 31, 2010 11:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

3-4 is not easy to suddenly transition into

even with an off season to work on the change it can take years to build a cohesive unit and retrain the defenders who will have different techniques and responsibilities.

That being said, I see two main problems with the current Bengals. Their Off. line and Defensive line are well below avg.

"They looked far more like they....were trying to screw the football than move it downfield" JungleJohn

by featherman on Oct 31, 2010 11:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

I wouldn't mind seeing a gradual shift to 3-4.

Just start toying with some 3-4 packages next year then, if it works, continue using it more and more until it becomes the primary defense.

Win a ring without the king! Cavs=2011 champs?

by sexsalad on Oct 31, 2010 11:51 AM EDT up reply actions  

it doesn't necessarily have to be all that different

THe Packers play Matthews more as a DE who occasionally drops back in coverage. That’s sort of how I see MJ fitting in.

Moisture is the essense of wetness, and wetness is the essense of beauty.

by Blue Steel on Oct 31, 2010 12:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

they play Dom Capers 3-4 defense

that’s their base defense

"They looked far more like they....were trying to screw the football than move it downfield" JungleJohn

by featherman on Oct 31, 2010 12:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

If a guy has been on the team for years

and mostly stunk or been invisible, what makes you think he’s gonna suddenly “step up”? It’s like asking a 10 year veteran with a .290 OBP to get on base more.

by occams_tiger_teeth on Oct 31, 2010 1:28 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Cincinnati Bengals.

Editor-In Chief

Cj_small Josh Kirkendall

Editor/Managing Editor

Rudiblanket_small Anthony Cosenza

5255_133614603784_666578784_2414703_1976100_n_small Jason Garrison

Authors

Photo_3_small BeerRun

010511170110_small Joe Goodberry

40297_422933299865_509514865_4658259_6466915_n_small Ryan Harper

Small Brennen Warner

Sb_nation_small Jack Cassidy

580551_10150822857707018_613867017_11694254_1239726425_n_small Nick_Crago

Img_0783_small Mike Fightmaster

Moderators

Nfl palewook

680764146_0eac16fabd_small 80%OFTHETIMEIMRIGHTEVERYTIME

Tawky_tawny_small UpStateMike

Joeb698_86e260_small joeb69

Bengals_stamp_by_jamaal10_small Doc Scratch