Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Most Dangerous Division in Sports

Week 11 Preview: Where The Buffalo Roam

TORONTO ON - NOVEMBER 07: Ryan Fitzpatrick #14 of the Buffalo Bills throws a pass against the Chicago Bears at Rogers Centre on November 7 2010 in Toronto Canada. Chicago won 22-19. (Photo by Rick Stewart/Getty Images)

Here come the Buffalo Bills!  Two small market teams with old-guard owners will get together this weekend in Cincinnati and play a friendly game of football where one team is likely to improve on its dismal record while the other feels that much worse about itself.  Bills fans are excited about the chance of winning in back-to-back weeks, while Bengals fans eye this game as their team's best chance at ending the current six-game losing streak. It could very well turn out to be an exciting game that comes down to the end between two quarterbacks who are close friends and former teammates.  There are some quality story lines in the match-up this week, but the game is blacked out and there are so few of us who still care anyway.  A game played in darkness - what a shame.

Rant About Television Blackouts (feel free to skip down)

Not that I blame anyone for not wanting to fork over $65 and up for a ticket to see two non-playoff caliber teams.  Instead, I blame the blackout rules and the men who profit from them.  Rather than preventing millions to watch because thousands won't attend, why don't teams partner with cable networks and offer the game as a pay-per-view program?  If you have the NFL ticket, then you are paying for just that, but even that prevents the buyer from watching in-market blacked out games.  Of course, I don't know the business ins-and-outs of the contract-law universe and I am sure that my ignorance prevents me from understanding why that wouldn't work, but going to an NFL game is overrated when you can watch it at home and get good replays with the company you prefer.  I'd rather watch my team on television as they play in an empty stadium rather than not watch them at all.  In fact, we can scale the stadiums down to nothing and watch the Bills and Bengals play a regular-season game at Georgetown, Kentucky and pay to watch it on television instead of cramming into a huge, overpriced place for more than a full-day's work.  If that could happen, owners couldn't screw cities with stadium taxes and threats to move elsewhere - move anywhere you want, just give me the option of seeing the games on television.  After all, if everyone in Cincinnati is paying taxes on the team's stadium, they should be able to see home games on TV no matter what.  Gimmie a break. 

On to the game.

Star-divide

Bills offense vs. Bengals defense

We know Ryan Fitzpatrick; he's a rascally gunslinger with accuracy and arm-strength issues.  He can be fun to watch when he's found an offensive rhythm and heartbreaking when he can't hit his target at all.  He's not a pure passer but he's quick and gritty for a quarterback - a very poor man's Steve Young.  I've always rooted for him because, despite his Ivy League history, he lacks that pretty-boy sheen that the QB fraternity embraces.  It seemed to me that when the Bengals (finally) adjusted their offense toward his skill-set, they found out that they were a good ball-control and power-run team.  That philosophical shift worked well from about Week 9, 2008 to Week 13, 2009 where it amassed a 13-6-1 record during that stretch.  What it also showed was that Carson Palmer was more effective in the Fitzpatrick-mold of the Bengals offense rather than the Palmer-mold.  Interesting.

Fitzpatrick's current offense is sort of a free-wheeling one where Fitzy has license to take shots down-field or use his legs to pick up first downs.  The group is loaded with some explosive talent and has found a bit of a stride lately.  There are two Buffalo players that I have noticed for the first time and one of them is receiver Steve Johnson.  I don't know much about his past, but this year Johnson has found stardom with Fitzpatrick.  He seems reliable around the sidelines, is fast and has some flashy open-field moves.  His success has led to Lee Evans seeing less double teams and has also benefited the numbers of third-receiver Roscoe Parrish.  The Bengals secondary will have to make Johnson their top-priority while staying mindful of Parrish on short crossing routes and bubble screens.  As for Evans, I would be fine with keeping Johnathan Joseph on him in single coverage and live with the consequences.

The Bills also employ a nice running-back tandem of Fred Jackson and rookie C.J. Spiller.  Jackson is not as fast as Spiller but is good at picking up at least some yards on every carry.  He has nice cutback runs and reminds me a little of Chicago's Matt Forte.  Buffalo doesn't run nearly as much as their opponents do, but that stat is likely skewed from a 1-8 team throwing more often on comeback attempts - Bengal fans know how that feels.  Fitzpatrick himself racks up a good deal of rushing yards on his scrambles, and on third down, that is something the Bengals must be mindful of.  Overall, I would think Zimmer might concern himself more with stopping the pass than worrying about the run, but if these guys start ripping off big chunks of yardage and Spiller busts loose for a big one, an adjustment should be made.  Hopefully the linebackers keep up their tough play from last week and continue to look active and aggressive.  Good play from that group could obscure the difficulties in other parts of the defense. 

This Bills team is capable of putting up yards, but they can also be derailed quickly if Fitzpatrick's wild improvisation can be contained.  The Bengals should have a handle of what their old backup can do; they should bait him and spring the trap once they know he can't resist.

Bengals offense vs. Bills defense

The other guy I have noticed this season in Buffalo is defensive tackle Kyle Williams.  This is a hard-working individual who isn't the tallest or fattest in the league, but gets a good push into the pocket on passes and he plays his running lanes very well by staying low.  The good news for Cincinnati is that Williams missed practice time this week with a bothered hamstring and may not suit up on Sunday.  Who becomes the next priority on that defensive line is hard to say - no one really grabs the eye, so this might be a team that the Bengals can pound with Benson up the middle. 

Another good player for the Bills is Paul Posluszny who has put together a very nice four seasons and arguably has the squarest head in the league.  In the limited Bills action I've seen this year, No. 51 is always on the screen making something happen.  You will probably notice him this week too - oh, that's right, you won't.  My bad.

And in their secondary, the Bills feature the hard-hitting Donte Whitner and good cover man, Leodis McKelvin.  They also have the promising safety, Jairus Byrd, who had nine interceptions last year but has zero so far in 2010 - funny how that works.  Collectively, this group is good enough make the Bills the seventh-ranked pass defense and should be hungry for an errant throw by Palmer, or a pass allowed into coverage by Terrell Owens.

If Buffalo can at least slow the run and get a few picks, they should win the game.  For the Bengals to reverse that outcome they should, A.) get both running backs involved with not only runs but also screen plays and check-offs, B.) use their possession-receiving rookies, Jermaine Gresham and Jordan Shipley on third downs, and C.) not force the ball to their superstars if any part of the play breaks down. 

Both TO and Chad Ochocinco make big plays - it's what has made their careers great - but when they're targeted and they can't pull it in, it always seems somewhat disastrous.  I don't want to sound like I am not appreciative of the amazing things they do for their team, but when they are targeted and can't convert, the play rarely goes for a harmless incompletion that sets up second or third down.  Instead the ball is either intercepted, missed for a huge play or leads to a fourth down.  They are hall-of-fame caliber players, but despite their heavy statistical production, they have been unreliable and it's killing the team.  That's why instead of going their way in crucial moments, I think Palmer should look for the supporting cast more.  Once TO, Chad and Palmer have proven they can consistently be on the same page, then you look for the great ones to make the important plays.  Otherwise, they're wasting downs in crunch-time.

I know what some of you are saying.  TO and Chad have combined for tons of yards and touchdowns, how can I blame them?  Because sometimes doing it often is less important than doing it when it counts the most. 

Special Teams

I included this segment this week because the Bengals will unveil a kicker I have never seen before.  If they find themselves in a situation like 4th & 4 at the Bills 32 yard line, they may just want to go for it rather than try out this new, mysterious leg.  The kick-coverage will also be worth monitoring.  Chances are, this game will be a low-scoring one and that field position will matter perhaps a little more than usual.  If  Aaron Pettrey kicks short kickoffs or starts missing field goals, I say we let Chad give it a go.

Conclusion

Many of us will see the action of the game after the fact.  It will be surreal watching a Bengals game for the first time and already knowing the outcome.  If the Bengals lose this one, the entire organization may just emotionally check out and let the season rot - if that hasn't happened already.  A win, however, could propel the men in stripes to an unfathomable stretch of seven wins in a row, a wild-card birth and an eventual Super Bowl championship!  And it all starts this weekend!  Here come the Buffalo Bills!

Bengals 14, Bills 9

 

Mojokong - covering my wagons.

Comment 18 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I don't want a top 10 pick

unless there’s a rookie salary agreement before the draft.

This is our year!

by Paul Cannon on Nov 20, 2010 12:29 PM EST up reply actions  

WHO DEY

Good analysis, but if CJ Spiller gashes us from the inactive list, then we will know for sure that the 2010 Bengals are cursed :) WHO DEY

by CincyBengals4life on Nov 20, 2010 10:33 AM EST reply actions  

hahaha

Thanks for that. Maybe I should look at injury reports as close as I look at tape.

B. Clifton Burke

by Mojokong on Nov 20, 2010 11:05 AM EST up reply actions  

Some interesting points...

It’s Evans, not Evens

Spiller is injured and won’t play this week

Parrish is out for the season

Those of us in western NY will get to see the game

Bills 28 Bungles 17

Trample the weak, hurdle the dead!

by fansince83 on Nov 20, 2010 11:42 AM EST reply actions  

At least we get 8 true home games per year…Bengals 27-16..count it

by CincyBengals4life on Nov 20, 2010 2:23 PM EST up reply actions  

Ha Ha

Sad, but true.

Trample the weak, hurdle the dead!

by fansince83 on Nov 20, 2010 2:51 PM EST up reply actions  

Now introducing your (2-8) Cincinnati Bengals

it could happen.

"wherever Brad St. Louis is and Shayne Graham is about to be." -R.F. Mehl

by palewook on Nov 20, 2010 12:43 PM EST reply actions  

I'm happy the game didn't sell out

(a) I don’t want to watch this shit
(b) Mike Brown gets less money from the people of Cincinnati for his shitty product.

The stadium should be empty and they should turn the lights out on the damn thing. Two crappy teams.

by occams_tiger_teeth on Nov 20, 2010 9:27 PM EST reply actions  

BLACKOUT...

I get that the idea behind it is that fans who are prohibited from watching it on T.V. will in theory go to the stadium and watch it in person.

Since the t.v. money is already set, if 2,000 people leave their television sets and head down to the stadium, the NFL won’t lose any revenue from CBS or Fox. But they will make the extra money from ticket sales. So in theory , the NFL nets an extra $75 × 2,000 ($150k). So i understand why they have the blackout. It makes good financial sense on paper in theory .

But if you look at the intangables, i think the blackout policy hurts them in the long term.

I think that a majority of fans when faced with the ultimatum of not seeing the game on t.v. or shelling out the $….will not be compelled to spend the $ to watch a team that isn’t winning (usually if the team is winning, blackouts are a non-issue). Maybe a handful from inside of I-275 will, but i don’t think a lot of the fans 1 or 2 hours away are going to go spend hundreds of $‘s to watch a pair of teams battle for the #1 overall pick in next year’s draft.

So the NFL isn’t going to make the extra $150k that they would expect to make by blacking the game out. Maybe they make 1/5th of that?

Also, if you prevent fans from watching your games on television, you are negatively impacting your future fan base. Not that the NFL will collapse tomorrow, but you’re laying the groundwork for pushing potential fans and current casual fans into other interests. If you treat your fans like that long enough it will eventually show up in lower t.v. ratings, lower merch sales, and lower attendance. And the lower attendance will mean more blackouts and the cycle will continue in a downward spiral.

Of course this analysis may sound silly as it is not something that will be evidenced overnight. But would probably take a generation to manifest itself in any real visible manner.

by ephram on Nov 20, 2010 10:00 PM EST reply actions  

Well it's supposed to get the Owners to

do something about putting a shitty product on the field too. In Theory.. But that doesn’t work either since they share all revenues across the board. That hurts the fans the most b/c there is no incentive to putting a good team on the field so they can sell out a game. Unless your Owner is someone like the Reds have, Bob Castellini. Someone that wants to win all the time.

by WHYUS!! on Nov 20, 2010 11:50 PM EST up reply actions  

one (of the many) silly things about the blackout is

that if you go north up I-75 to a town like Sidney, OH (no i don’t live there), you’re about 100 miles away from Cincinnati. But your CBS provider is going to be in Dayton.

So while your town is miles from the 75 mile radius, and while the blackout isn’t going to motivate you to drive 2 hours each way to watch a bad product on the field….you’re punished by the NFL because your CBS provider (in Dayton) is within the 75 mile radius.

And the same is true in other directions too…

by ephram on Nov 21, 2010 12:24 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree
I say we let Chad give it a go.

"In Zim We Trust"-TennBengalfan
"You don't live in Cleveland, You live in Cincinnati"-Sam Wyche

by TennBengalfan on Nov 21, 2010 1:22 AM EST reply actions  

I'm out of state, I can still see the game at a BW3's, right?

Moisture is the essense of wetness, and wetness is the essense of beauty.

by Blue Steel on Nov 21, 2010 9:30 AM EST reply actions  

Depends

if your in lexington, no, But if your in Louisville yes. If your in Indianapolis you can too. Actually anywhere outside of the 75 mile radius will be able to see the game. It goes by the zipcode and that determines if your outside of the 75 mile radius.

by WHYUS!! on Nov 21, 2010 9:42 AM EST up reply actions  

Bengal Links

It’s my opinion that the Bengal organization has already checked out both emotionally and practically speaking, for ‘10. In fact, i wonder how many NFL teams’ results so far this year have been adversely affected by the potentially looming lockout season, next year. Teams like the ‘boys and the Vikes seem not to have participated much this year, and other teams that were deemed to be contenders based on last seasons’ records also seem to have had trouble getting untracked this season, for unknown reasons. I’m searching, in vain perhaps, for some excuse for the ‘10 edition of the “orange and black”. It’s something that has become an almost annual pre-occupation with this Bengals’ fan, but maybe justifying my unexplainable allegiance to this franchise is akin to some kind of enigmatic addiction that has no answer.

For what it’s worth, the following online links may be of some half-hearted interest to some excruciatingly, long-suffering “die hard” fans: www.atdhe.net and www.channelsurfing.net.

Great article, Mojokong, especially given the game that you were assigned to peak our interest with, as fans in denial.

by Fair weather fan on Nov 21, 2010 10:04 AM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Cincinnati Bengals.

Editor-In Chief

Cj_small Josh Kirkendall

Editor/Managing Editor

Rudiblanket_small Anthony Cosenza

5255_133614603784_666578784_2414703_1976100_n_small Jason Garrison

Authors

Photo_3_small BeerRun

010511170110_small Joe Goodberry

40297_422933299865_509514865_4658259_6466915_n_small Ryan Harper

Small Brennen Warner

Sb_nation_small Jack Cassidy

580551_10150822857707018_613867017_11694254_1239726425_n_small Nick_Crago

Img_0783_small Mike Fightmaster

Moderators

Nfl palewook

680764146_0eac16fabd_small 80%OFTHETIMEIMRIGHTEVERYTIME

Tawky_tawny_small UpStateMike

Joeb698_86e260_small joeb69

Bengals_stamp_by_jamaal10_small Doc Scratch