Bengals Ordered To Garnish Adam Jones' Wages
In a very controversial move at the time, the Bengals signed Adam Jones to a two-year contract. He is scheduled to make $545,000 in 2010 and $640,000 in 2011 before he's a free agent. In the hopes to repair his image and rebuild his playing career, Jones simply did what was asked of him, staying out of the public eye with anything outside of football.
That doesn't mean his past won't follow him. According to the Enquirer, Common Pleas Court Judge Ralph Winkler ordered that a significant portion of Jones' salary may be garnished by the Cincinnati Bengals to pay Elegante Leasing Company for $240,925 owed by Jones "because he stopped making payments and crashed the Bentley but didn't pay for its repairs."
In September 2005, legal documents show, Jones leased the Bentley for five years for $218,632. Jones made the initial payment of $70,000 and monthly payments of $2,519 through March 2008 but stopped paying after that. He also damaged the car, requiring $58,000 in repairs - money the leasing company said it had to pay to get the Bentley back.
7 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Negotiate a settlement
Jones needs to make a settlement deal. Pay for the repairs, apply his downpayment and a partial payout for the balance. Leasing company gets the car which has high value retention. He’s facing surgical expenses which I’m sure won’t be cheap and frankly he needs a break. How long does this guy have to pay for past sins? He seems like a responsible person NOW so why pile on.
re: surgical expenses
I certainly hope he isn’t having to pay for repairs due to an injury he received on the field
CET Brown
Can't Evaluate Talent.
Ya never know
MB probably has a co-pay and an 80/20 split medical coverage. Oh wait ! its probably Workers Compensation coverage. So MB escapes again !
Something to think about
This was a leased vehicle, so I’m guessing he had full coverage insurance. Shouldn’t the insurance have paid for the car??I wrecked a leased vehicle years ago, and my insurance company paid the bank for the car. In this case, there could be a difference between what was owed and the value paid by the insurance, but not for the full amount.
try getting a lease on a car like that without full coverage
somethings up
by BoomerEsiasonsLoveChild on Dec 11, 2010 3:55 AM EST reply actions

by 























