Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

Glauber: Bengals regret signing Laveranues Coles in 2009

Much is being made with the possibility that Terrell Owens could be in a Bengals uniform in 2010, mostly thanks for Chad's unrelenting effort to bring his friend to Cincinnati. Adam Schefter tweet yesterday (is it proper to say Tweeted?) that Owens coming to Cincinnati "isn't happening". In one respect, I wouldn't mind. He could help this team offensively in the passing game. Draw backs? They're well known. In fact, they might be a bit suffocating for some to entertain the notion of signing Owens. And I wouldn't have a problem with those people either. He's a distraction and tends to break up locker rooms. Is that worth it? I think he brings positives and negatives and you have to work towards bringing out those positives.

One of the more interesting notes comes from Goffchile's FanPost, which brings up a recent Bob Glauber tweet that reads:

Source familiar with Bengals' situation tells me there are no plans to sign Terrell Owens. Team also regrets Laveanues Coles signing in '09

Bob Glauber is an NFL columnist for Newsday. If you remember, I was bombarded for observations regarding Marvin Lewis' usage of the English language when reflecting Coles. OK, so maybe I'm grasping at straws. I admit it. And I have nothing against Coles, other than his drops -- and maybe the fact he's making a lot of money and not producing. He's a hellva veteran presence that's good to have around, says Lewis. However, I'm more convinced than not -- maybe to the point of being blinded -- that the Bengals won't retain Coles in 2010.

Think of it this way. Coles had just come off a season in which he caught 43 passes for 514 yards receiving and is scheduled to make $4.65 million next season with $6.4 million earned in 2011 and 2012. Based on last year's production -- in a league that asks "what have you done for me lately" -- will the Bengals want to keep Coles around if they plan on retooling the position at that cost? Don't forget about Mike Brown, who will likely weigh this out heavily. Are the Bengals looking to integrate Jerome Simpson into a larger role? I hope they do, if anything, to get an idea of what Simpson can do during a regular season game. Are there other free agents out there, like good ol' Kevin Walter, that the Bengals will sign to build the team's depth? What about the draft?

I don't want it to appear that I want Coles out of Cincinnati. But it does appear that Coles has more going against him than for him. You know, like a Newsday writer saying, through sources, that the Bengals regret signing Coles. Yikes.

Comment 6 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Let's be Honest

None of these guys can catch.
I expected more from Coles and Caldwell, and they did their marginal best, however, Chad’s in the same company of not catching those really clutch catches.
Owen’s won’t help because he’s the same type player; marginal in his catches.
Cosby and Simpson need more playing time and less scrutiny in practice. Put them in games as starters or alternates and give them plays. More important, get Palmer to throw to them-all his receivers- regularly in practice so he’ll feel comfortable in games.
Hell, it ain’t rocket science people!

Minister of Great Legs

by Drofintellact on Feb 24, 2010 12:25 PM EST reply actions  

I don't agree on Caldwell

He didn’t blow anyones socks off, but I think preformed pretty well. He made two game winning catches early on in the year and (though not outstanding) was our best third down reciever.

I also think there is one thing that a lot of people leave out about Coles that makes me willing to give him another year to get his s#$% togther. He blocks really well downfield. Thats the difference to me between a 2 yard run off tackle/ TE and a 10-15 yard run.

It's still a good season if we go 2-14 and beat the Steelers twice.

by Bengals FTW on Feb 25, 2010 1:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Coles

Coles is a great receiver and he was practically the only receiver that could catch in the last half of the season besides Ochocinco. Coles WILL have a better season this year, you will see.

by robusmc on Feb 24, 2010 2:54 PM EST reply actions  

I can't disagree

But I think he would be enhanced with another true deep threat.

by jim0ijk on Feb 24, 2010 4:32 PM EST up reply actions  

Does cutting Coles make the Bengals a better team?

No. We have no cap so that won’t be affected. And if other WRs make it obvious that Coles isn’t needed (in training camp) then he can be traded or cut then. If anything Coles will be better next year with more time in the system.

by Sheffieldbengal on Feb 24, 2010 4:35 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Cincinnati Bengals.

Editor-In Chief

Cj_small Josh Kirkendall

Editor/Managing Editor

Rudiblanket_small Anthony Cosenza

5255_133614603784_666578784_2414703_1976100_n_small Jason Garrison

Authors

Photo_3_small BeerRun

010511170110_small Joe Goodberry

40297_422933299865_509514865_4658259_6466915_n_small Ryan Harper

Small Brennen Warner

Sb_nation_small Jack Cassidy

580551_10150822857707018_613867017_11694254_1239726425_n_small Nick_Crago

Img_0783_small Mike Fightmaster

Moderators

Nfl palewook

680764146_0eac16fabd_small 80%OFTHETIMEIMRIGHTEVERYTIME

Tawky_tawny_small UpStateMike

Joeb698_86e260_small joeb69

Bengals_stamp_by_jamaal10_small Doc Scratch