What Might Ruin the NFL Next Year
I'm very concerned about the NFL Collective Bargaining Agreement (it's set to end by March 5). People have been talking about how it's certain that there will be an uncapped year for 2010, and that there might not be any football in 2011. I think with tight-wad Mike Brown, we're going to be left in the dust behind owners like Dan Snyder. If the NFL doesn't fix it, the NFL is going to look like the MLB with the annual "Haves" vs. the "Havenots."
What do you guys think?
Read more of my thoughts at: http://hubpages.com/t/117259
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Cincy Jungle's writers or editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of Cincy Jungle's writers or editors.
12 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Teams like the redskins and Cowboys wont spend as much as you think.
Most owners expect a salary Cap to return at some point, so teams are going to be smart and not spend too much where they cant get under the cap if they need to.
www.fantasydaddy.com
There will also be
Teams that dump Salary. I think that Bufffalo, Tampa Bay and Jacksonville could prove to be even cheaper than MB, given the chance.
not buffalo
they really want to win bad!
they already signed 2 GMs this offseason, id like to see MB say that
www.fantasydaddy.com
by Joe Goodberry on Feb 8, 2010 9:02 PM EST up reply actions
Maybe there's just some fundamental thing I'm missing here,
and I don’t claim to be knowledgable about this stuff at all…but how, from any perspective, could the absence of a salary cap be a good thing for a league that prides itself on parity? For real, somebody fill me in.
the league dosnt want to be Capless
they want to get the CBA done, then there can be a cap
www.fantasydaddy.com
by Joe Goodberry on Feb 7, 2010 11:21 PM EST up reply actions
The league isn't going to descend into random money spending, there are certain restrictions that will be in place.
RFA is up to 6 years so many top end FA’s are off the market.
Top 8 teams can only sign a FA if they lose one.
ETC ETC
"Every Day I walk past 6 Lombardi trophies not 6 rushing titles" - Greatest Tomlinism ever.
by Josh Roberts (ESGB) on Feb 8, 2010 8:48 PM EST reply actions
that is only for 2010
those rules will evaporate too once the CBA is officially dead in 2011.
B. Clifton Burke
Most owners that have two brain cells
…would want a cap. Its also pretty clear that the NFLPA wants a CBA and I’m sure that a CBA would include a cap. The big issue of contention, if I understand correctly, is the amount of money teams are required to pay out in compensation. I think its 80% (player salaries, plus a fund for injured/older players).
Without a cap, it could turn into a baseball like situation where some teams shell out 200 million, others 60 million with the latter team dumping by mid-season. I doubt it would get that bad, just because of the nature of the sport (shorter careers in NFL). But, I could see a big problem with rookies demanding outlandish guaranteed contracts.
I tend to believe that cooler heads will prevail and we will see a CBA soon. A lockout is not in either party’s interest.
Here's the scoop
NFLPA: wants to extend the CBA for six more years, which will force owners to pay 60 percent of their team revenue to player salaries. Like his predecessor, the late Gene Upshaw, De Smith insists that if the salary cap disappears, it will never return. An uncapped year would lead to a wide range of changes to the free-agent market.
Ownership: wants the percentage of team revenue that goes to player salaries down to 42 percent. There’s no way in hell that they want a salary cap because it limits their financial freedom which owners hate. Opposed to a spending spree of the highest paid players, it seems more likely that owners are more interested in paying their least important players less than they do now. No salary floor.
Both sides want a rookies to be paid less, so at least there is that common interest.
I think a deal will get done right before the deadline but I do not expect the cap to return. For small-market teams, the draft and the coaches they employ will keep them competitive. Larger market teams will likely wait for prospects to mature and pay them the jackpots they crave. Fortunately, football is a sport where player talents are very comparable and coaching and preparation make the difference. Here’s to hoping that Mike Brown spends more money on scouting and good coaches as opposed to big name free agents.
B. Clifton Burke
The Inevitable NFL Lockout (NFL Uncapped Season)
Their will be no deal before March 5th, so we can all agree that the next NFL season will be uncapped. It is my feeling that this very complicated and controversial disagreement with the NFLPA, the owners are/will frame it in a manner so as to win it in the court of public opinion. The owners have taken steps that insure that they continue to make money even if no football is played in 2011, such as re-structuring coaches contracts to reflect a work stoppage, putting a clause into the current TV deal to insure TV money keeps flowing into the owners pockets and hiring the Lawyer that handled the NHL Lock-out for starters. (The NHL and the NBA opened their books to their respective player associations and showed profits and lost statements). There’s a clear message being sent by the owners to the NFLPA led by DeMaurice Smith and the hang nail to these negotiations will be the reluctance of the owners to open their books to the NFLPA.
Demuarice Smith is no Gene Upshaw (RIP) who enjoyed a cozy relationship with former commissioner Paul “too tall” Tagliabue. Tagliabue seem to always have " the best interest of the game" mindset even though he worked for the owners. I am sad to say I do not get the same impression when I see/saw Roger Goodell speak at the NFL State of the Union address in South Florida. Goodell’s responses to key questions leave more question than answers. According to Goodell since 2006 3.6 Billion dollars in incremental revenue has been generated and 2.6 Billion of that has has gone to the players. These may be correct numbers but the union is going to ask for paper work to support the position. Are the owners willing to do this? I don’t think so. I will say this for Goodell. He was asked about the retired player benefits by Sal Palantonio of ESPN and his response was " I’d like to see the retired players benefits increase and not decrease". Goodell’s position on this paticular matter is a positve for the players but is not the position of his bosses (the owners).
Smith is a trial lawyer and shrewd business man and I think the owners are afraid to open the books for Smith and each other for that matter (large market owners don’t want the smaller market owners to know how they make). If the owners are not very trusting of each other…….well……. they will not be paticularly trusting of the NFLPA and it’s new leader Smith.
One more thing on this subject. The NFL landscape will be change and for the worst in my opinion if the shared revenue stream system is eliminated per the desire of the Jerry Jones’s and Dan Snyder’s of the league.

by 



















