Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Which Players Will Join The 3,000-Hit Club?

Antonio Bryant is a risk that could go either way

On Wednesday, the Cincinnati Bengals reportedly solved their riddle, "mirror, mirror on the wall, which wide receiver is the most reasonable of all." There was some reaction against the signing, mostly because Antonio Bryant is too much of an unknown. We've heard about his baggage. We've heard about his injury. And quite frankly, does a receiver that's recorded two 1,000-yard seasons deserve a $28 million contract over four years? Is this another deal where the Bengals are risking their necks for a guy that could prove to bite them? Terrell Owens, for all he's done in this league, wouldn't have been the risk Bryant is. For one, Owens was good for a one-year deal and the Bengals could reset and see where they stood. With Bryant, they won't have that luxury. With Bryant, they're saying to themselves that he's a longer-term solution and that he'll earn his keep by recording career highs.

And yes, for $28 million, you'd better have at least one season where you record more than 83 receptions and at least 1,250 yards receiving. Take out Bryant's career year in 2008, his numbers average out to 41 receptions, 634 yards receiving and three touchdowns per season -- and he averages 13 games played per season. And we're not even including his 2007 because he was released by the 49ers after reported "clashes" with then head coach Mike Nolan. Over that summer, he failed a drug test and was finally reinstated into the league on September 17. By that time, no team wanted him and retirement seemed likely until the Tampa Bay Buccaneers offered Bryant a minimum contract. Since 2008 was his career year, he was franchised by Tampa Bay and offered up a terrible season.

Should we argue that Bryant is being rewarded for one career year that occurred two years ago? Images of Antwan Odom flash by.

Is Bryant a risk? I absolutely believe so. Have the Bengals improved from Tuesday until Bryant signs? I admit, they have. At this point, I also think he's a big upgrade over Laveranues Coles. But that's speculation. I'm assuming here. I'm willing to be patient on Bryant though and see what he does on the field and reserve judgment until then. If he improves on his career year from 2008, then we'll be euphoric because the results will only push the Bengals that much closer to the playoffs. But if he doesn't, calls of a bust will surface very quick and we'll have another Laveranues Coles situation on our hands.

Comment 10 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Antonio Bryant isn't worth 7 million a year.

Mike Brown over-paid for an under-performer with mental issues. Set aside the physical concerns. Bryant’s mental state has held his career back more than any physical injury.

I’m about to type something that 6 months ago, I’d have bet anyone a large sum of money, I’d never ever say, much less, believe when I said it.

Terrel Owens as a 1 year signing is the move the Bengals should have made this off-season.

Adding T.O. to the Bengals for a 1 year test run, could have done something special in Cincinnati. Adding Jones and Bryant is a larger risk, to the team’s lineup, the chemistry, and threatens to destroy the locker room when either of those 2 go mental. Signing T.O., passing on Bryant, and releasing Jones in spring training would have been the best scenario for this team and the chemistry. Only carrying T.O. on the roster, he acts up, the team blows it off since he’s T.O. and he’s only one guy acting up.

"wherever Brad St. Louis is and Shayne Graham is about to be." -R.F. Mehl

by palewook on Mar 11, 2010 10:20 AM EST reply actions  

could've, would've, should've

embrace the move, it’s the move we got

If you don't live like you wanna, you live like you shouldn't

by trotanoy on Mar 11, 2010 10:40 AM EST up reply actions  

man or mouse

Everything with Bryant is up in the air. He has never been on a solid team and has never really had a great QB or another big WR threat. At the very least, defenses have to respect him and his ability.

by snake19 on Mar 11, 2010 10:33 AM EST reply actions  

Good Article

It does a great job showcasing the main worries going forward with Bryant. Versus TO, this deal was made on account of two reasons. First, Ocho is most likely gone when his contract is up and Bryant does have the talent to bridge the gap between him and a younger guy who will be developed into the future number one. Second, Bryant can be a deep threat as well as contribute in the intermediate and underneath passing attack. In the past, outside of Ocho, the deep guys haven’t really be able to develop in to all around receivers and the underneath guys have struggled in the downfield game. His signing isn’t bullet proof and we’ll see how it turns out.

by Cedric Benson Boat Party on Mar 11, 2010 10:35 AM EST reply actions  

Tough Call

The Bengals are betting on Bryant being more productive than in the past with Palmer, who is (usually) superior to any of AB’s former quarterbacks. He’s had some good years, and those were the ones with the best QBs throwing to him – Jeff Garcia and Trent Dilfer, still not perennial Pro Bowlers and both past their prime when throwing to AB.

This guy’s never had a quarterback like Palmer. We’ll see how he does here.

by Pardon_My_French on Mar 11, 2010 10:39 AM EST reply actions  

"never had a quarterback like Palmer"

Palmers 2 seasons removed from being a QB like Palmer.

and then there’s the Bob Bratkowski situation to consider..

"wherever Brad St. Louis is and Shayne Graham is about to be." -R.F. Mehl

by palewook on Mar 11, 2010 10:46 AM EST up reply actions  

With all due respect to T.O.

what this team needed was a receiver who can stretch the field. After Slim went out with the broken arm, Ocho saw more double coverage, and the opposing safeties, who had been playing “as far back as I have ever seen” according to Carson at the beginning of the year, moved way in, shutting down Caldwell’s production. Whatever T.O. was or is going to be, a primary downfield threat isn’t it.

I agree with palewook’s implication that if the team really wanted a downfield gamechanger, they should have gone after Marshall, but if they’re not willing to part with the 1st rounder and the $10 mil per year, then Bryant is as good as it was going to get with UFA’s this year.

by Mr. X on Mar 11, 2010 9:23 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Cincinnati Bengals.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
My poem...dedicated to Chili Dog.

Recent FanPosts

Small
This is how I think we should draft what do you think???
Chad-johnson_small
LIVE MOCK DRAFT SIGN UP! ...6 teams left... Draft date TBD.
Stephraim_small
the "it's been a couple hours since a mock draft was posted" mock draft....but seriously....
Nfl
Unbreaking the NFL's blackout policy
Small
Bad News
Stephraim_small
goodbye free NFL games
Small
Bengals trade the 21st pick...? To Dolphins?
Small
I have a trade all teams would be happy with.
Thumbnail_small
2012 Bengals Mock Draft Scenarios (3 Rounds)
Small
On break at work, awkward to read cincyjungle

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Editor-In Chief

Cj_small Josh Kirkendall

5255_133614603784_666578784_2414703_1976100_n_small Jason Garrison

Editor/Managing Editor

Rudiblanket_small Anthony Cosenza

Authors

Photo_3_small BeerRun

010511170110_small Joe Goodberry

40297_422933299865_509514865_4658259_6466915_n_small Ryan Harper

Moderators

Nfl palewook

680764146_0eac16fabd_small 80%OFTHETIMEIMRIGHTEVERYTIME

Koolaid_small UpStateMike

Bengals_stamp_by_jamaal10_small Doc Scratch