Bobbie Williams and the Bengals are in a "holding pattern"
Remember back in the day when the Bengals sported one of the league's best offensive lines nearly five years ago? Good lord, it's been that long? Yep. Eric Steinbach was dynamic, versatile and stable. His loss to free agency was noticed. In response, the team moved Andrew Whitworth out of his natural tackle position to left guard, allowing aging veteran Levi Jones to man left tackle while Rich Braham hung up his cleats after a career-ending injury in 2006. The line quickly dissolved. And the team struggled to rebound, evident by a combined 11-20-1 record between 2007 and 2008.
Through all of the changes, veteran Bobbie Williams remained as the team's starting right guard since signing with Cincinnati in 2004, starting 93 of a possible 96 games. He's a steady rock, a vocal leader and a very good guard. Some have claimed that his production has dropped and many would prefer quicker smaller guards that would open the play book slightly.
Pro Football Focus suggests otherwise. The website ranks Williams as the league's fifth best guard in 2009, especially strong as a run blocker. He did allow three sacks (Alan Faneca led the league with six allowed by a guard), 11 quarterback pressures and an additional hit. All of which are not close to ranking as the highest at his position.
For the past week, negotiations between Williams and the Bengals have hit a holding pattern, writes Joe Reedy.
A report surfaced out of Dayton two days ago that the Bengals were close to re-signing right guard Bobbie Williams. According to Williams agent, Tony Agnone, the two sides are at the same point where they were last week — in a holding pattern.
Agnone said that he remains hopeful that both sides can come to an agreement but they continue to test the waters with other teams. In checking with others around the league, three teams have expressed interest about Williams but that one of them is a Final Eight squad that has not lost anyone yet.
The report that Reedy is talking about was written by Carlos Holmes earlier in the week. He wrote that according "to a source with knowledge of the situation, the Cincinnati Bengals are close to a deal with offensive guard Bobbie Williams."
Another report suggested that the Bengals will be able to sign Williams based on what they do at wide receiver. The thinking was that a long-term deal with Antonio Bryant would make it harder for the team to sign guys like Bobbie Williams or Reggie Kelly. Bryant signed and now we're in a holding pattern.
If the Bengals can't land Williams, then they could move beyond their "interest" phase with Houston Texans guard Chester Pitts, who is scheduled to visit with the San Francisco 49ers next week.
0 recs |
13 comments
|
Comments
KEEP Billiams!!!!
no that was not a typo
it comes down to mind over matter....if you don't mind, it won't matter
+1
He’s more than just a football player in cincy: keep him. Besides if you sit in a holding pattern too long, you’re likely to eventually run out of gas, or become incredibly nauseous. The key here is to keep our spatial orientation; remember which direction the team needs to go in order to win.
Oh, and Mikey better hit his 1 minute inbound..
by 80%OFTHETIMEIMRIGHTEVERYTIME on Mar 12, 2010 12:07 PM EST up reply actions
Bengals sign Chris Davis
Which begs the question: Who the hell is Chris Davis?
looks like
he is primarily a kick and punt returner who was with Tennessee in 07 and 08. Creating competition there isn’t bad. Reading into it more, it could signal next years plans include Scott and Cosby receiving a larger role in the offense and less time in the return game . . .
by Cedric Benson Boat Party on Mar 12, 2010 11:58 AM EST up reply actions
Uncapped year.
Re-sign Bobbie and get Pitts. The LG rotation of Livings and Mathis isn’t working and is hurting continuity on the line.
by BengalAnthony13 on Mar 12, 2010 12:06 PM EST reply actions
Also, a few mistakes in articles here.
Rich Braham got hurt in 2006 and retired after that season.
Another article claimed that Dan Coats’ biggest play was the recovery of his own fumble against GB. Actually he fumbled and Coles recovered it to get the big play. Coats doesn’t even deserve credit for that. He’s piss-poor.
by BengalAnthony13 on Mar 12, 2010 12:07 PM EST reply actions
LG not working ?
Mathis didn’t give up a sack all year. The reason he split time with Livings is Nate does a decent job too. The run blocking couldn’t have been too bad or Benson wouldn’t have had the numbers he turned out. Even an aging LJ and rookie Scott had 100 yard games. Part of the problem protecting Carson is a lack of creativity. Not enough play action or roll outs. If we as fans can tell when the Bengals are going to pass don’t you think the defenses have it figured out as well. Here’s hoping Mathis is signed soon. He’s very underrated in my opinion. Losing him would hurt.
Disagree
Positions on the O-Line need competent starters in all 5 positions. Mathis didn’t give up a sack because he was in on only 60% of the plays or less. They need to re-sign Bobbie and get Pitts for the other side. If not, get either Bobbie back or get Pitts then draft Iupati in the first round. In Carson’s best years, he had two Pro Bowl tackles (Levi was an alternate), a Pro Bowl alternate LG in Steinbach, and another good one in Bobbie, as well as a top-10 Center. They began to rebuild the line last year and should see improvement this year, but I still stand by the argument that the best O-Line they could have is: Andre and RT, Bobbie at LG, Cook at C, Whitworth at LG, and Collins a LT. Collins is a pure LT and played well in ’08. Whitworth is solid but not outstanding, and him being on the left side with Collins would help him come along.
by BengalAnthony13 on Mar 12, 2010 2:02 PM EST up reply actions

by 




















