Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Tiger Woods Makes His 2012 PGA Tour Debut

Tampa Bay Buccaneers blogger reflects on Antonio Bryant

We've spoken quite a bit recently regarding the team's signing of Antonio Bryant. Do you really blame us? It's not every day that the Bengals sign someone for $28 million. And it's not every day that a writer says, the "Bengals, one of the cheapest organizations in the history of the National Football League, paid the man." Thank you very much.

My initial reaction was that the signing was a risk. But like most risks, there's great rewards. More simplified, it's the argument that says if it goes bad, it could go really bad but if it goes good, it could go really good. B. Clifton Burke spoke how signing Bryant will greatly help the Bengals offense.

Truth be told, I have limited knowledge of Bryant. I know the name. I know the teams he's played for. I've read some of the scouting reports -- which is one big snooze-fest because they're simply a combination of one-word descriptions that holds little context. I needed the help of YouTube just to remember that sweet one-handed reception at the back of the endzone. Other than that, the blinders that only allows me to focus on the Bengals, assure me that my universal knowledge of 1600-plus players in the league would be, at best, limited.

That's why I reached out to Niko, the head blogger at SB Nation's Tampa Bay Buccaneers blog, Buc 'em, to get a perspective from a fan and observor of Bryant's.

"When Antonio Bryant first came to Tampa Bay, our fans thought he was going to be nothing more than another David Boston; an out of sorts wide receiver trying to get his career back together," Niko remembers. "Boston got a DUI during preseason and was gone by week one."

Oddly enough, Bryant's introduction in Cincinnati had many calling him the new Laveranues Coles, mostly due to the lack of recent production against the cost to obtain the player. It's an unqualified comparison, but can you blame a fanbase that wants the best, only the best, and everything is else is scratch, sloppy seconds, or even, dare I say, not worry of our written word? A little melodramatic, aren't we? OK, it wasn't that bad. But the focus was on Terrell Owens and Brandon Marshall and Bryant kind of became that third-and-final option.

"However Jon Gruden used his new toy regularly as Joey Galloway spent the whole preseason battling an injury. Bryant took over Galloway's spot, and was heavilly favored in the offense run by Jeff Garcia. Bryant is SERIOUSLY TALENTED! (his caps, not mine). Remember that one handed catch on MNF vs the Panthers?"

While Niko recaps Bryant's successful 2008 season, the issue of what happened in 2009 tends to resonate. Were there internal issues? Can Bryant be trusted? Talent is one thing, but can he work with this team for the greater good? What happened in 2009?

"Last year, Bryant had the injury bug. It bothered him all year, plus we had three QBs play last year, the last one our new franchise quarterback Josh Freeman. No one knew if Bryant would return or not. When he was released with the excuse that we wanted to go younger, many of us wondered what was up with that; twenty-nine isn't that old. Then we started to hear words that he quit on his routes or ran wrong routes, etc.. He also complained publicly about his use.

"He was not trouble in 2008, but he was a little in 2009. So I would say if he gets his share of passes, he will be happy and VERY VERY productive with Ochocinco. You guys may have a serious offense next year. But the Bucs clearly did not want to go with him while developing a quarterback for the next decade, for whatever reason. Some fans here are upset he is gone."

I think all things considered, after speaking with Niko, after sitting back and just absorbing it all, the Bengals made a good choice signing Bryant because of his talent. And I'm confident that the Bengals have enough pieces in place that they can help disspell internal issues before they surface, unlike before. And since the Bengals have nowhere to go but north when it comes to the passing offense, I'm sure that Bryant will be a happy cat with the contributions that will go his way.

Comment 19 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I think Mike Brown

need’s to learn how to sell tickets.. Terrell Owen’s would have helped sell out … Antonio Bryant on the other hand is just not known enough.. He is still a big question mark and will be until he proves he is worth the money..

by JamesShively on Mar 12, 2010 4:50 PM EST reply actions  

via twitter

Adam_Schefter
  
Filed to ESPN: There’s a new running back in Washington. Redskins reached agreement with RB Larry Johnson on a three-year deal.

by JamesShively on Mar 12, 2010 5:32 PM EST reply actions  

well it’s kind of Bengal related since he played for us last year.. I wonder what they payed him to play 2nd fiddle to Portis.. If it was relatively cheap I would have liked to sign him back..

by JamesShively on Mar 12, 2010 5:50 PM EST up reply actions  

Portis has become a pretty big injury liability.

Johnson flashed some skill last year and provides much needed depth.

by jsl413 on Mar 12, 2010 5:58 PM EST up reply actions  

3 yr deal up to 12 million averages to 4 million a yr.. He’s not worth that to us..

by JamesShively on Mar 12, 2010 6:02 PM EST up reply actions  

That’s more then Ced make’s starting here..

by JamesShively on Mar 12, 2010 6:41 PM EST up reply actions  

It is a fine singing for the Redskins.

Not worth the Bengals re-signing him of course.

by jsl413 on Mar 13, 2010 12:11 AM EST up reply actions  

You guys have done something I did not think possible

You have made me understand why MB doesn’t care what we think. If he goes out and signs a WR he is stupid. If he doesn’t sign a WR he is stupid. You are upset that he spent 28 mil on a WR many think is very good but you would applaud a 45-45 mil contract and a 1st round pick on Marshall. An extra 18 mil or so that could be used to sign another player 3-4 million or extend two CBs whose contracts are coming due pretty soon. Plus a first round pick that could be used on an OL guy, TE, Safety or DE. There were only 3 good WRs out there Marshall, who is just too expensive, Bolden who the Ravens signed and Bryant who we signed for the best contract we could get. TO may still happen but he is a 1 or 2 year player at best. OK the Ravens beat us to the deal on Bolden. Their front office gets paid to deal as well. I just think there is no pleasing you guys.

"Coincidence is God's way of staying anonymous"

by JUNGLEJOHN on Mar 12, 2010 11:43 PM EST reply actions  

I think most people are happy with the Bryant signing.

I sure am. I think people are just gunshy from the Coles contract that looked a lot like Bryant’s, but I think people are also much more open to see how Bryant performs.

by jsl413 on Mar 13, 2010 12:10 AM EST up reply actions  

We paid Bryant too much.

JK. I think it was a good move, as was Coles last year. Even though Coles was pretty much a bust for us, it was great to see us go after some qualtiy free agents. It worked great on D but not so much on O (as in Coles).

by UpStateMike on Mar 13, 2010 6:42 AM EST up reply actions  

RE:

Actually, I’m not exactly sure what JungleJohn is talking about. We’ve pointed out about as much as we can. We talked about how he is a risk. We’ve talked about how he’s a good fit for this team and we’ve included a Bucs fan perspective to give us his impression of Bryant. I thought we hit all of the angles.

Actually, I’m not really sure if any of our posts or stories have included anything about whether we “dislike” the signing at all.

Blogger at CincyJungle.com -- SB Nation Cincinnati Bengals blog.

by Josh Kirkendall on Mar 13, 2010 2:54 PM EST up reply actions  

Please accept my apology everyone

I had two sessions open in order to cross reference some posts. I was interrupted by a phone call prior to my response. I posted this response on the wrong forum, one in which everyone was on a feeding frenzy regarding how we should have gone after Marshall very strong. It was late and I was tired. I actually have no problems at all with this string of posts. Again, I apologize.

"Coincidence is God's way of staying anonymous"

by JUNGLEJOHN on Mar 13, 2010 10:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Off topic but what do you guys think?

I must have too much time on my hands, but playing around with this uniform builder and wanted to see what everyone thought…

http://www.footballamerica.com/assets/fba/assets/uniform/builder.jsp?build=14.5.1.0.1.0.1.9.0.1.0.11.11.1.1.l66,101,110,103,97,108,115l.3.1.1.1.9.1.2.1.2.1.1.9.1.1.0.0.l5,9:4,1:3,1:7,1:2,0:1,1:0,0:ll5,9:7,1:0,1:l

Cut and paste the link and it should work

by Bengals NFL Champs on Mar 13, 2010 1:09 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Cincinnati Bengals.

Editor-In Chief

Cj_small Josh Kirkendall

5255_133614603784_666578784_2414703_1976100_n_small Jason Garrison

Editor/Managing Editor

Rudiblanket_small Anthony Cosenza

Authors

Photo_3_small BeerRun

010511170110_small Joe Goodberry

40297_422933299865_509514865_4658259_6466915_n_small Ryan Harper

Moderators

Nfl palewook

680764146_0eac16fabd_small 80%OFTHETIMEIMRIGHTEVERYTIME

Koolaid_small UpStateMike

Bengals_stamp_by_jamaal10_small Doc Scratch