Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Bracketology 2012: Duke Finally Steps Up To The No. 1 Line

Drew Rosenhaus, the bane of front offices everywhere, represents Tank Johnson. This Twitter post tells me that he wasn't happy with the Bengals offer, if one was made, and that Tank will be testing the market.

almost 2 years ago Jermaine_gresham_tiny jsl413 25 comments 0 recs  | 

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

...

:(

CB85......Collaros for Heisman

by TennBengalfan on Mar 5, 2010 6:09 PM EST reply actions  

Mike Brown and Kate Blackburn

obviously have a way with completely insulting agent’s with either their offer’s or their lack of hospitality… Either way someone needs to teach them how to run a professional sports team… I suppose we can find someone who has experience like Tank in the draft…

by JamesShively on Mar 5, 2010 6:10 PM EST reply actions  

I think

it might be the fact that they run the organization as well as own it. So they know if they do more than the draft it’s extra paper work for them.. Much easier to just draft people every year and not worry about the rest. I mean who cares if we win as long as we don’t have all that work on our desks..

by JamesShively on Mar 5, 2010 6:24 PM EST reply actions  

Does Tank deserve much of a contract?

for a penetrating type of DT he doesn’t get many sacks. He is decent against the run but he got manhandled a few times and his play against Detroit was pitiful (no pressure and no penetration of any kind against an inferior line). Although i’d like him back to depth… its not like he set the world on fire.

by Sheffieldbengal on Mar 5, 2010 6:29 PM EST reply actions  

He played pretty well when he was healthy.

He wasn’t a Pro Bowl DT, but he was a solid rotational DT that knew his job in our system, and I think he played very well for us.

He’s not going to get much on the open market w/ this year’s depth at DT and this may be a power play from the shark.

by jsl413 on Mar 5, 2010 6:30 PM EST up reply actions  

sounds similar

to Benson’s flirting with the Texans last year to me. One team i wouldn’t try these types of moves against is the Bengals though. Once they’ve made their mind up on a players value that’s it.

by Sheffieldbengal on Mar 5, 2010 6:32 PM EST up reply actions  

It's crazy to think...

that the Bengals went out and signed this guy last year after reading these comments. What made them do such a crazy thing? Were they high last year? Signing FA, pfft! Get MB some MJ, let’s see if we can bring back last year’s magic!

Sorry for my sarcasm, just seems ironic to complain about not signing a FA, when in fact they did sign him as FA at one point.

by Grizzlyfox on Mar 5, 2010 6:33 PM EST reply actions  

Well it wasn't just a response to any one comment on this article,

just a general statement on that attitude. I’ve read on too many sites the past week that the Bengals won’t sign any FA b/c they are cheap and they never sign any FA. It gets a little old. Team had just about a .500 team (56-55-1) since 03. Yeah, things aren’t great, but this isn’t the 90s Bengals anymore. It still is bad, but it’s not the travesty it once was.

FWIW, Rosenhaus is kind of a tool. What else would anyone expect of him? Why even tweet this? Cuz he’s a tool.

by Grizzlyfox on Mar 5, 2010 6:46 PM EST up reply actions  

Well, there hasn't exactly been a marquee FA acquisition in Cincinnati in quite some time.

It’s not as bad as the 1990s, but the front office hasn’t learned. When they spend money, it’s on players like Coles, and not on players like Boldin who are still in their prime and producing even when injured.

No one saw Coles being this bad this year, but I question the organization’s ability to identify and target talent effectively.

by jsl413 on Mar 5, 2010 6:51 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm sorry, but...

Isn’t the goal of a sports team supposed to be winning? Or is it just making sure the owners are in the black? Following the Bengals has made me lose site of what professional franchises are supposed to do.

FML.

by IFChris on Mar 5, 2010 6:38 PM EST reply actions  

The proper goal is BOTH.

For those who can't remember the uncapped FA rules, this link's for you.

by FriarBob on Mar 5, 2010 7:46 PM EST up reply actions  

+1

but with winning comes money. Super Bowls = $

CB85......Collaros for Heisman

by TennBengalfan on Mar 5, 2010 7:50 PM EST up reply actions  

The goal of the team is up to the owner

I have always thought that MB wants to win he doesn’t know how. Also this is the family business. If it goes under what do the Browns have? Would you takes risks that could put your family on the street to win a silly game?

by jim0ijk on Mar 7, 2010 10:36 AM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Cincinnati Bengals.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Madmen_icon_small
Bengal Fans, Here's How to End Blackouts

Recent FanPosts

Small
If I'm betting, here are 2 FA I can actually see us going after this offseason
Bengal-tiger-vest_small
New Mock Draft!
Thumbnail_small
DT Brandon Thompson Highlights VS WVU
Small
If MB is finally serious about winning...
Muppets-animal_small
The Draftees We're Not Talking About
Small
Shipley as the #2
Thumbnail_small
Marvin Jones-WR-Vs Stanford 2011
Small
I am participating in a mock draft as the bengals and am looking for help
Thumbnail_small
Mocks updated

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Editor-In Chief

Cj_small Josh Kirkendall

5255_133614603784_666578784_2414703_1976100_n_small Jason Garrison

Editor/Managing Editor

Rudiblanket_small Anthony Cosenza

Authors

Photo_3_small BeerRun

010511170110_small Joe Goodberry

40297_422933299865_509514865_4658259_6466915_n_small Ryan Harper

Moderators

Nfl palewook

680764146_0eac16fabd_small 80%OFTHETIMEIMRIGHTEVERYTIME

Koolaid_small UpStateMike

Bengals_stamp_by_jamaal10_small Doc Scratch