Thornton: Bryant would be a better fit than Terrell Owens in Cincinnati
We've heard that a bulk of the Bengals activity through the first weekend in free agency, is making phone calls. Mostly to receivers. Receivers like Nate Burleson and Kevin Walter signed themselves out of the market. Brandon Marshall is being courted by the Seattle Seahawks and Anquan Boldin was shipped from Arizona to Baltimore in a trade.
With all of the movement that's happened, the choices for the Bengals, Joe Reedy writes, falls to Antonio Bryant and Terrell Owens.
John Thornton writes that between the two receivers, he'd pick Antonio Bryant.
Bryant has had a few issues early in his career, but he is a really good player. He is similar to Chad Ochocinco with his route running but plays with a mean streak similar to WR Steve Smith of the Panthers. When he played for the Browns, I remember him talking to one of our DBs during the game and after the game the DB told me Bryant is nuts. I think if the Bengals were choosing between T.O and Bryant, Bryant would be a better fit. Both are super talented, but Marvin Lewis hates self promotion. I know he deals with some of Chads celebrations and things off the field, but he really just wants a guy to be a football player. Marvin also likes his players to have a chip on their shoulder, and Bryant seems to have that.
On issues like this, we tend to rely on guys like Thornton who likely has the resources to do additional scouting and, just maybe, being a former NFL player might give him the insight into what to look for.
Bryant, who will turn 29 on March 9, has consistency issues. Since 2004, Bryant has played a full 16-game schedule once and his production shows. He's recorded more than 80 receptions once in his career and twice he surpassed the 1,000 yard receiving mark. While he's talented, it should be of note that Bryant hasn't always been with the best offenses with Cowboys, Browns, 49ers and Buccaneers.

Even so, does Bryant bring that much more than what Laveranues Coles brought? If I were to go out on a limb, I'd probably fall of the branch because I can't defy gravity. I also think that the Bengals have Owens targeted first and Bryant is the team's backup plan if Owens signs elsewhere. Neither veteran receiver is scheduled for a visit with the Bengals.
0 recs |
12 comments
|
Comments
TO
made Ryan Fitzpatrick look good. The End.
by Sheffieldbengal on Mar 7, 2010 2:19 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
Sign them both
Put T.O as the number 2 and put bryant in the slot.Draft another WR and move Andre to saftey.
+1
" I don't lie, I tell a different version of the truth."
by Purple City Middie on Mar 8, 2010 12:33 AM EST up reply actions
Bryant v. TO
Bryant is better on paper. He is in the prime of his career, we could comfortably sign him to a multi-year contract-filling a need for a few season allowing younger guys to develop, he can stretch the field (consistently has a 15+ y/r), and has more unrealized potential. Or is “unrealized potential” just another way of saying “chronic underachiever”?
TO is at best a stop gap. He definitely has the skill of a good receiver, but I am not sure if he can be a deep threat. But does he have to be? Or do the Bengals just need someone to take the heat off of Chad? If he just fills in for a year, will Caldwell/Simpson/Draft Pick be ready to takeover next year?
I am less concerned about the “antics” of either player. Bryant seems to have grown up and is out to shake the “locker room cancer” moniker. Something that the Bengals seem to like. TO is a showman, but also knows how to win.
We’d be fine with either, but I can see how Bryant might be the more logical answer.
I agree with Thornton
At 6’1’’ 210, Bryant provides a bigger (Palmer wants the bigger guys) and more explosive target than Coles did, especially downfield. AB has the ability to bring double teams off Ocho or capitalize on lesser coverage when teams rotate to Ocho. Being a younger option than TO, Cincy could acquire his services for 3-4 seasons with a deal that would pay near what Burleson received from Detroit. and it would make drafting a WR this year much less of a concern. If they end up with TO, I look at it as a one year addition since he is 35 or 36. His one year pay will be similar to what AB’s would be per season, and you are still left to answer the question of what do we do in ’11 and beyond.
by Cedric Benson Boat Party on Mar 7, 2010 4:43 PM EST reply actions
tiny eyes
I’m not that big on Bryant. He has small eyes that creep me out a little bit.
This is our year!
I think Coles also mentioned that..
…Palmer likes guys with big eyes, that’s why they didn’t have any chemistry. ;)
What do you think he's thinking in that picture?
I think he’s listing all the people on his hit list.
This is our year!
sign both
TO for one year won’t be prohibitively expensive; with Coles gone MB would have the cash freed up to sign Brant for four.

by 





















