Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

2010 NFL Draft: Three Positions The Bengals Could Draft That You're Not Expecting Them To

The conversations have been similar. Cincinnati will draft a Tight End. No, no. They're going to draft a safety. No, no. We've spent the last month justifying the points we've made when deciding which position that we think they should draft. But as Marvin Lewis has said, the team will draft the best available. What could that mean?

What if that best player is at a position that we don't expect the Bengals to draft? What if that best player is a running back within the first two rounds? Or a cornerback? What about a middle linebacker? Positions that are firmly held by players that could be considered foundation pieces surely wouldn't be addressed in the first two rounds of the NFL Draft. Right?

Let's examine possible draft day surprises by selecting three positions that the Bengals could draft in the first two rounds.

Star-divide

RUNNING BACK. There's no arguing Cedric Benson's contributions. Simply put: Benson was the team's best offensive weapon in 2009. Averaging 96.2 yards-per-game, Benson's 301 rush attempts ranked sixth; if he played all 16 games, Benson would have easily been the top workhorse in the NFL. Only five running backs recorded more plays of 10 yards rushing or more and of the running backs that averaged 20 carries-per-game, he's the only one that didn't record more than one lost fumble.

And which running back recorded a post-season high 169 yards rushing against the league's best rushing defense? That's right. Benson.

You know his accolades. You know how critical he was when this team transformed from a finesse passing offense to the team that was handing out softball sized bruises.

With all of that said, Benson is entering his final year under contract.

How the prospect would help this year: If the Bengals believe that Benson will be impossible to sign beyond 2010, Cincinnati could draft a running back high in the draft. On a roster that included eight combined games missed with all three running backs in 2009, a new back would provide added stability and depth.

...and Beyond.

A running back this year would give the team options if Benson leaves. Not only would a new running back this year help the squad in case of injury, he would have a year under his belt in the system.

...why not one of the backups on the roster already? Backup running back Bernard Scott recorded 206 yards rushing in a two-game stretch against the Oakland Raiders (119 yards) and Cleveland Browns (87 yards). So we know he can carry the ball when needed. However, there's questions as to whether he has the durability to be a workhorse and Brian Leonard is primarily a third-down back.

CORNERBACK. For the exact same reason as Benson, the Bengals will be faced with a dilemma at cornerback. If they sign Johnathan Joseph, who's entering the final year under contract, to a long-term deal, then they could very well lose Leon Hall. The question here is, will the Bengals want to sign two cornerbacks to big-time deals? This blogger says they should. This blogger says they better!

How the prospect would help this year: As a top-rated cornerback, the prospect would instantly be the team's nickel cornerback with a schedule against some of the league's top rated passing offenses in 2009.

...and Beyond. If the Bengals can't sign Johnathan Joseph beyond 2010, they'll need someone to step in immediately. Rather than having David Jones or Morgan Trent, the team could figure to be better off in the long run drafting a cornerback high in the 2010 NFL Draft if that cornerback is the best player available.

LINEBACKER. Yes, the Bengals signed their full compliment of linebacker from 2009. They're good too. But there's much room for improvement.

How the prospect would help this year: Cincinnati could always use linebackers, especially with a team that's banking on riding the defense's back again. Cincinnati hasn't been completely without their share of injuries at linebacker, with Maualuga and Keith Rivers suffering long-term injuries in their respective rookie seasons.

However, unless that linebacker is a known pass rusher, the most a rookie linebacker can help on defense this year will likely be on special teams.

...and Beyond. Dhani Jones, Brandon Johnson and Rashad Jeanty are all entering the final year under contract. The general thinking is that Rey Maualuga will move back to middle linebacker once Jones leaves and the Bengals will need to figure out what to do with strong-side linebacker.

While one could argue that the team's linebackers are solid, there's plenty of room for improvement and planning if half the team's linebackers leave for free agency after next year.

Again, we're not suggesting that the Bengals are going to draft any of these positions in the first two rounds of the NFL Draft.

If one had to choose three positions that the Bengals would draft that we're not expecting them to -- positions that makes sense -- what would yours be?

Comment 40 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Brought up in another post

that it isn’t impossible that Spiller is there at 21. I wouldn’t be disappointed if we grabbed him. Watch the tape on him and you’ll be impressed…he’d be an immediate contributor on offense and in the return game.

by Bengals NFL Champs on Apr 21, 2010 10:51 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

Spiller

Wont be there @ 21, so forget about it.

by James Schmid the great on Apr 21, 2010 11:18 PM EDT reply actions  

Its unlikeley he'll be there...

…but I have seen a few mocks where he does fall to 21. We would be insane to pass on him.

by goffchile on Apr 22, 2010 9:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

Jahvid Best

will most likely be there, and he brings a similar skill set. He does have concussion issues though.

by Cedric Benson Boat Party on Apr 22, 2010 10:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

While Benson really did a lot to convert me at the end of last season, his comment about not wanting to play a game that matters in week 17 turned me off to him again. Nevertheless, I don’t know if I’d be happy with drafting a running back. I’m curious to see how Scott develops, and there are a lot of RBs already on the roster with Leonard in the mix. Linebacker, however, is a position of need. Dhani Jones has been very good, but he’s an old man in NFL years. If Rolando McClain pulls a Maualuga and mysteriously drops, the Bengals should grab him immediately and leave Rey outside. I have no doubt McClain will be a beast. I’m not as big a fan of Sergio Kindle, but I still have a good feeling about him potentially becoming a solid pass rushing OLB, allowing for Rey to move inside. I don’t like the idea of letting Hall or Joseph go. Best case scenario if one leaves the team is that a rookie comes in and plays comparatively well, which isn’t an upgrade just a very risky lateral move.

by indesignkat on Apr 21, 2010 11:19 PM EDT reply actions  

man,..

get utta here… Ceds a beast and one of my favorite players…

85 + 15 = 100...

by Trevor Long on Apr 22, 2010 4:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

I would certainly be open to the possibility of picking up Rolando McClain, in the unlikely event he fell to us. Spiller? Already got him. His name’s Bernard Scott.

by IgnatiusJReilly on Apr 21, 2010 11:20 PM EDT reply actions  

Maybe Scott is a year better

But Spiller is probably a more complete prospect.

McCluster for wildcat/rb/wr in rd. 2?

by jsl413 on Apr 21, 2010 11:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

hell yeah on Dexter McCluster

FAST… can be used in the slot, outside, backfield… pretty much anywhere, he’s just a playmaker. WOULD LOVE THAT PICK.

3 yards and a pile of dust

by Hudepohl Dey on Apr 22, 2010 8:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

I agree as well.

McCluster would have more immediate impact than Bryant or Gresham(IMHO), and could be had in the 2nd-3rd round.

My 2010 Sports wishlist.
1. FIRE DUSTY! NOW!
2. Cavaliers Championship
3. Bengals win Super Bowl XLV

by Danimal, Destroyer of Worlds on Apr 22, 2010 1:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

I have been singing the McCluster or Shipley song for 2 months

Most on the Bengals Insider board think I am nuts. If I am nut I guess I would be the last to know but want either of these guys is not an indication of it. Caldwell is NOT a great slot WR and never will be. McCluster is supposed to be too small and Shipley is the product of a spread offense. BS IMO but that is what I hear all of the time.

"Coincidence is God's way of staying anonymous"

by JUNGLEJOHN on Apr 22, 2010 1:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think Kyle Wilson is a strong possibility

An elite #3 corner would help far more than a tight end (in Brat’s offense, anyway).

With Thomas being likely out of the picture, I’m seriously hoping for Wilson or Pouncey.

by Big Sky Bengal on Apr 21, 2010 11:53 PM EDT reply actions  

strong side backer

Anyone think Brandon Johnson could play the strong side once rey moves to the middle?

by casapennec on Apr 22, 2010 12:13 AM EDT reply actions  

seems like every time

Brandon is in, he’s making big plays and involved in just about everything. So, yeah, but a backup would be a good idea. Koa Misi in the third maybe.

by IgnatiusJReilly on Apr 22, 2010 12:22 AM EDT up reply actions  

or Roddrick Muckelroy?

3 yards and a pile of dust

by Hudepohl Dey on Apr 22, 2010 8:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

Roddrick Muckelroy…. with a name like that you’d have to be a badass, agree?

3 yards and a pile of dust

by Hudepohl Dey on Apr 22, 2010 8:37 AM EDT up reply actions  

At 21 It's best player available.

If that is QB, LT, DT, LB, CB, Safety, LB etc. I wouldn’t care if they took Claussen if he fell to 21, he’d be better than O’sulli, and Jordan P. It would show the team is looking at the future when Palmer isn’t here anymore, and I point to Aaron Rodgers who is a top 5 QB now after sitting behind a great QB for years. I wouldn’t mind if one of the top LT prospects fell and they took him, or CB or anything. Cincy doesn’t have a pressing need that HAS to be filled with this pick. They have 3 other picks in the top 100 that can fill needs. If there is a top 10 or 15 talent here you take that guy that fell no matter what you have at his position. It’s how good teams become great, and how great teams stay great.

by JoseOle on Apr 22, 2010 8:23 AM EDT reply actions  

I was gonna say QB, too, but rd. 1 isn’t the time to draft one as far as I’m concerned. In fact, QB is probably the only position I wouldn’t draft round 1. We need a guy who can come in and play right away, not sit on the bench for three years. If we went after a guy like Pike, or LeFevour in the third round however, I would not be disappointed.

This is our year!

by Paul Cannon on Apr 22, 2010 8:27 AM EDT up reply actions  

Pike...

Tony would be a good pick up if he falls into the Bengals lap. I think this kid has alot of promise and just needs the right situation for him to shine. I think if the Bengals could pick him up (NOT IN THE FIRST OR SECOND ROUND) but maybe in the third/fourth this would be a stellar pick! He is already a hometown favorite and would fit in quite well. I also think he would benefit having Carson in front of him. He would have no expecations his first year and could learn from one of the better quarterbacks in the league. Jordan is not the answer I’m sorry… the only reason he is on this team is because of Carson. Jordan is like the Tyler Palko of the Steelers… He is only there because he is a hometown kid. Neither of these two guys need to be in NFL and I believe are incapable of playing in the NFL. My point… I wouldn’t be mad at the Bengals for picking up Pike!

by Child Pleeez on Apr 22, 2010 9:13 AM EDT up reply actions  

honestly, i think

 they could get pike in the 5th Round. Not a knock on Pike, but he very well could still be on the board at #152, and that wouldn’t be a bad pick at all. I’d be happy about it.

3 yards and a pile of dust

by Hudepohl Dey on Apr 22, 2010 9:16 AM EDT up reply actions  

Don't apologize for Jordan

It’s clear that he’s on the roster because of the duplicate last name bonus (DLNB) that seems to benefit us so nicely (see “the Johnsons”). Although it’s not clear if the DLNB applies if they are in the same family.

This is our year!

by Paul Cannon on Apr 22, 2010 9:17 AM EDT up reply actions  

Didn't they just draft him a few years ago?

OH but his name was Jeff Rowe then. Cincy already tried the tall QB from the spread, he didn’t work out. The QB coaches can’t teach a spread QB how to play in this system otherwise Rowe would still be around. Pike was a great college QB against defenses with zero talent. I would rather have a pro style QB from the SEC that showed potential like Snead in the 3rd or 4th round.

by JoseOle on Apr 22, 2010 12:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don't know how

you can say that the Bearcats didn’t face a tough defense. I beg to differ. Well atleast in regards to the Pitt Panthers. Pitt’s Defense was one of the best this year.

by Child Pleeez on Apr 22, 2010 3:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

Best available except QB

Man do I love the fact that for once in my life, the Bengals are drafting on talent, not because the roster is in shambles. First round $ is to high for a QB to sit for five years, his contract will be up before he even sees the field. I do not think Rodgers was a first rounder was he?
What happens if the pick Greshem, move Coffman to a hy-brid receiver (how often does Dallas Clark really block?) and then draft for cornerback, safety,wide receiver, and D-line depth, and adding some competition at linebacker, O-line, and and running back. This would all be dependent on re=signing Kelly though.
If this were to play out, there is not a weak spot on the roster.

by nyeguy on Apr 22, 2010 8:42 AM EDT reply actions  

Rogers was a first rounder and was actually grabbed with the 21st pick as well, if my memory serves me.

This is our year!

by Paul Cannon on Apr 22, 2010 8:59 AM EDT up reply actions  

Foiled!

Good homework there Rocket Man :)

This is our year!

by Paul Cannon on Apr 22, 2010 1:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

if you only knew

my fiancee is a Packers fan, that sort of thing earns me brownie points

by Rocket_Man_G on Apr 22, 2010 5:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’ve wondered about converting Coffman to WR too. He’d be a great red zone threat. Problem is though that he’d probably be a situational player in that role, and situational players need to play special teams….I really don’t want to watch Coffman wiff on Josh Cribbs twice a year. That’s just scary.

This is our year!

by Paul Cannon on Apr 22, 2010 9:01 AM EDT up reply actions  

I have always wondered how Leonard would do in the slot on a spot basis.

He has good speed, good hands, secures the ball and is too good of a player to be sitting on the bench all but 4-5 plays a game. You know he is a guy who knows where the 1st down marker is does all he can to get there. If you need 6-7 yards for a first Leonard is a guy I want to have his hands on the ball in space. Hes only bad play was a fumble on a hellaceous hit he didn’t see coming when the lineman missed his block. He saved our butt a dozen times on 3rd down by getting tough yards.

McCluster has the same kind of grit. He pumped 20 reps.at 125% of his body weight. This little dude is quick, elusive and strong. You won’t see him running out of bounds to avoid a hit. He doesn’t take hits – he delivers hits. He would be a beast out of the slot and would be a good back up to Scott as a bonus. No LBs and few safeties can cover him 1 on 1. I repeat IMO Caldwell is not a fit for slot receiver. Not quick enough off the LOS, lets the ball get into his body and does not have the ball security to gain Carson’s trust. He is a flank WR in a 3 wide set with good downfield speed and a good #4 but not an ideal slot guy.

Could you imagine Bryant, Chad, Gresham and McCluster in the slot with Carson behind a more mature Oline with Benson loaded into the chamber? That would have DCs awake at night trying to figure how to deal with it. Carson would be a 4000 yd passer and Benson would have 1600 yds.

"Coincidence is God's way of staying anonymous"

by JUNGLEJOHN on Apr 22, 2010 1:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

BTW that would only be the top 2 picks

There are several OL and D guys available with our 2 3rd and 2 4th round picks. Even if our D only got some backup help with us scoring 3 -4 TDs a game they are quite sufficient as is. IMO our big O weakness is not TE but the slot position. If McCluster is gone get Shipley.

"Coincidence is God's way of staying anonymous"

by JUNGLEJOHN on Apr 22, 2010 1:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

long term...

The most pressing position that we need good young talent is safety. Our starters are both over 30 and we need guys to fill in esp. In case of (probable) injury. Every other position we have young guys w promise. Sans QB which we all seem to agree cannot be drafted early.

by quickslant on Apr 22, 2010 10:43 AM EDT via mobile reply actions  

How bout

Taylor Mays blowin up suckas across the middle?

3 yards and a pile of dust

by Hudepohl Dey on Apr 22, 2010 10:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Cincinnati Bengals.

Editor-In Chief

Cj_small Josh Kirkendall

Editor/Managing Editor

Rudiblanket_small Anthony Cosenza

5255_133614603784_666578784_2414703_1976100_n_small Jason Garrison

Authors

Photo_3_small BeerRun

010511170110_small Joe Goodberry

40297_422933299865_509514865_4658259_6466915_n_small Ryan Harper

Small Brennen Warner

Sb_nation_small Jack Cassidy

580551_10150822857707018_613867017_11694254_1239726425_n_small Nick_Crago

Img_0783_small Mike Fightmaster

Moderators

Nfl palewook

680764146_0eac16fabd_small 80%OFTHETIMEIMRIGHTEVERYTIME

Tawky_tawny_small UpStateMike

Joeb698_86e260_small joeb69

Bengals_stamp_by_jamaal10_small Doc Scratch