Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Ryder Hesjedal Wins Giro d'Italia

Bengals Game Changing Offseason Moves: Cincinnati Drafts Tight End Jermaine Gresham in the First Round

Sponsored Post: This post is presented by Sprint. Bringing you the first wireless 4G network from a national carrier. Only on the Now Network.

Many teams across the NFL last year employed a pass-catching tight end that was crucial to their passing game. The Indianapolis Colts and New Orleans Saints, both Super Bowl teams often used their dynamic tight ends to get to that stage, and other AFC playoff teams followed suit, but not the Bengals. In fact, since Bengal offensive coordinator Bob Bratkowski has been with the team, Cincinnati has never featured much of a receiving threat at tight end. The last time the team addressed the position with any kind of notable name was when they signed Reggie Kelly way back in 2003. Yet all of that is expected to change for the Bengals in 2010 thanks to the addition of their first-round pick, Jermaine Gresham.

Leading up to the draft, Gresham was widely predicted to end up in Bengal stripes. After a remarkably lame showing by last year's tight end tandem of Daniel Coates and J.P. Foschi, the position was listed at the very top of 'team needs' for Cincinnati, and, in spite of a knee injury that cost Gresham his senior season at Oklahoma, he was still ranked as the best available prospect at that spot. So when the Bengals pick was up, they chose Gresham over receiver Dez Bryant in a move that indicated the commitment to power football the team has adopted.

Up until last season, the Bengals offense was always a vertical-passing one. Once the move was made to a power-rushing offense, new weapons were needed. Many of those weapons were already in place, but none with the skill set that Gresham possesses. With Gresham, Carson Palmer has a tall, wide target who is fast and powerful. Defenses will be forced to show him extra attention in the red-zone and on third down, which should free up space for the revamped receiving corps.

There were times last year when Palmer was forced to improvise out of the pocket. The biggest knock on last year's receivers was that they couldn't get open on the fly. Gresham is the perfect player to maneuver away from defenders when the play goes off-script, and can pick up the yards that went wasted a season ago.

Another knock on the passing game was its lack of explosive plays. Gresham also has the ability to stretch the field deep down the middle, challenging slower linebackers or smaller safeties in the process. If he garners too much attention deep in the middle from the defense, outside receivers could find themselves in one-on-one match-ups and pull down some long throws.

That isn't to say that Gresham is perfect. He does have health concerns surrounding his injured knee. He worked out very well at the NFL Scouting Combine and also at his pro day, and there are no reports of any apparent lingering side-effects from the injury, so for now, all is well.

He must also prove that he can block. The Bengals buried last year's third-round pick, Chase Coffman, deep on the depth chart for his inability to block, before eventually shelving him for the year with bone spurs in his ankle. Gresham blocked a lot more often than Coffman did in college, and comes into training camp with a decent reputation as a blocker. For additional assistance, the team re-signed Reggie Kelly who, before rupturing his Achilles tendon last training camp, was considered a tremendous blocking tight end and a positive team leader. Kelly should help Gresham on the field and in the locker room as well.

The final concern is of Bratkowski actually using him. As mentioned, Brat has never featured the tight end in any meaningful way in the passing game, but with the waves of criticism he faced from last year's offensive output, coupled with the high-profile and big contract Gresham is soon to sign, Bratkowski will be forced to install more plays designed for the tight end.

As he should. Gresham has the ability to make an impact right away. Carson Palmer has never had a talent like Gresham in his arsenal and the kid can only make his life easier. In fact, everyone on the offense will enjoy the presence of Gresham and the defensive attention he commands. He is a game-changer, and only adds more beef to the already rough and tumble—AFC North Champion—Cincinnati Bengals.

Mojokong—Not the first to say so; just a parrot from the same tree.

Comment 36 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

you missed someone

You can’t say “The last time the team addressed the position with any kind of notable name was when they signed Reggie Kelly way back in 2003” because we signed Ben Utecht, who was definitely as big a name or bigger then kelly was in ’03.

We addressed the spot with Utecht but not for the Front Office’s fault, he got injured.

Plus how can it not be said they didn’t address TE last year with Coffman. For one he was a third round pick that was a 2nd round talent because of an injury. Then he is Div-1’s alltime top pass-catching tight end in history. That is addressing the TE spot is it not.

The Bengals have definitely tried to “address” the TE spot plenty of times in the Marvin Lewis Era.

by Jaydolla on May 28, 2010 2:41 PM EDT reply actions  

An excellent point that I’ve made a number of times. We have the wildly entertaining “the Bengals prefer blocking tight ends” crowd that seems to have been asleep for the past few years. And this is a subsection of the “We don’t pass because we’re a power football team, not because we can’t pass” crowd. I guess we’re paying Palmer a lot of money because he hands off well, and Chad, (formerly) Coles, and Bryant because they’re maulers in the run game. Utecht, Coffman, Gresham…all known for catching the ball.

by bodacio zk on May 28, 2010 3:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

you can technically throw Sherry in there too

He was a late pick so you could argue he wasn’t a huge priority as far as “addressing” the TE spot but he was picked… and he was descibed by scouts as an “undersized one dimensional pass catcher” aka not a good blocker at all.

by Jaydolla on May 28, 2010 4:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

RE: Utecht

I hear what you’re saying, but saying that Utecht was addressing the pass-catching TE spot seems a bit of a stretch. He was second behind blocking-first TE Reggie Kelly and the most productive season in his career was 37 receptions in 2006. And he had two career touchdowns before coming to Cincinnati. I know he had Dallas Clark ahead of him and all, but the expectations with Utecht seemed a bit high to begin with because people wanted a TE with hands (hell, I fell into that crowd too!)

So by saying that the team addressed TE by signing a second-on-the-depth chart guy that barely put together better receiving numbers than Kelly in respective career-years, then yes, that’s true.

Blogger at CincyJungle.com -- SB Nation Cincinnati Bengals blog.

by Josh Kirkendall on May 28, 2010 4:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

Come on Kirk...

you know damn well they didn’t sign Utecht to a 3yr 9 million deal to not be a contributor\starter, so that is obviously the Front office addressing the TE spot.

Utecht – 71 catches 800 yds 3 TDs in three seasons
compared to
Kelly – 69 catches 790 yds 2 TDs in FOUR seasons… 3 of his four seasons he caught zero TDs

Its obvious signing Utecht was to address the TE spot and get a better catcher to combine with Reggie

by Jaydolla on May 28, 2010 5:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

"Utecht to a 3yr 9 million deal to not be a contributor\starter"

A contributor, sure. Everyone is a contributor and I’m sure Utecht would have been a fine contributor opposite of Reggie Kelly. Consider this though, Utecht had six starts with the Bengals when he was healthy and all but one was in double TE sets with Kelly starting opposite of Utecht. Contributor yes. The team’s all-purpose starting TE, no.

Blogger at CincyJungle.com -- SB Nation Cincinnati Bengals blog.

by Josh Kirkendall on May 29, 2010 11:24 AM EDT up reply actions  

"Its obvious signing Utecht was to address the TE spot and get a better catcher to combine with Reggie"

I agree with this. We addressed the need for a backup Tight End. But that wasn’t what Mojo was talking about either.

Blogger at CincyJungle.com -- SB Nation Cincinnati Bengals blog.

by Josh Kirkendall on May 29, 2010 11:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

37 catches as the 2nd tight end(in Indy) is leaps and bounds better than the 20-25 you’d get from Kelly as the starter.

As Jaydolla mentions, you don’t give a guy 3 million to be Reggie Kelly’s buddy. I remember seeing quite a bit of Utecht that preseason, and at least I got the indication he was going to see a lot of time before he got his chest caved in.

I know Reggie Kelly is a god in these parts(for some unknown reason), but it seems awfully stubborn not to admit there’s been a pretty dedicated effort to get more production out of the position.

by bodacio zk on May 28, 2010 6:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree with most of what your saying bodacio but...

Are you really saying that you don’t understand why Reggie Kelly is so beloved by the fans and coaches and players? Its pretty obvious to me. Most coaches and fans love the guys who overachieve. He contributes to the TE position, offense, and for that matter the entire team way more than his numbers will ever show. Fans and coaches always love a player who pours his heart out and sacrifices whatever asked of him for the better of the team. Fans and Coaches also love players who may not have all the talent in the world but still contribute because of their sheer lack of determination and the fact they have a “I will outwork everyone else” attitude. Coaches love to have players that are basically an extension of the coaching staff as players, hell fans love them too. Add to all this that Reggie Kelly is a true professional and a great teammate and great leader in the locker room and it is obvious why everyone loves Reggie.

Also the fans saw a HORRIBLE TE last year in Dan Coats and that just reinforced to the fans why we love Reggie so much. Anyway I agree with the rest of what you were saying. The Bengals FO definitely tried a few times to address TE with Utecht and Coffman at the very least. Utecht may have been a backup but he was considered to have starter quality talent at the TE position. He was definitely brought in to start and contribute heavily. Fair or not there was a lot of expectations for Utecht.

I guess the bottom line is that we have finally addressed the TE position and it should be a strength of this team for atleast the next 5 years, IMO.

by C1ncy4Life on May 29, 2010 10:20 AM EDT up reply actions  

No, I get all of the “assumed” Reggie Kelly qualities, but do we have any concrete examples? How do we really know he outworks everyone? How do we really know he’s a great leader? Don’t get me wrong. I’m not trying to say his absence was a blessing in the 10-6 season, but you do have to ask: How much did we really miss whatever it is that he brings to the table? Coats and Foschi sucked, but overall we ran the ball better(without his world class blocking) and the locker room stayed together(without his world class personality). I think it’s nice for guys like Hobson to do fluff pieces on guys who seem to have their heads on straight, but at the end of the day it’s on-field production that counts. We need a lot more from out tight ends.

by bodacio zk on May 29, 2010 11:02 AM EDT up reply actions  

"do we have any concrete examples?"

We’ve run quotes, posts about what other players and coaches say about the influence that he has on players.

Blogger at CincyJungle.com -- SB Nation Cincinnati Bengals blog.

by Josh Kirkendall on May 29, 2010 11:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

Fantastic. Teammates say he’s a great guy. How many games does that win? Again, they were fine without him. Just like the defense and the equally deified John Thornton.

by bodacio zk on May 29, 2010 2:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

A great lockeroom atmosphere provides LOTS of wins.

If your a basketball fan look at some of the supposed "Dream Teams over the last few years. You can’t just have Superstars at every position and expect to win. It is a MUST to have players like Kelly that are willing to do the “dirt” and that show the young guys what it takes to win. We do have concrete evidence that he does that. Add to this that Football relies far more on “Team” then any other sport and it has the potential to add lots of wins.

Also he was still around the team last year, so his leadeship was still felt.

by C1ncy4Life on May 30, 2010 9:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

Great locker room atmosphere?

Were you paying attention from 2006-2008?

Again, more fluff.

“Reggie does the dirt”
“Reggie shows young guys what it takes to win”

Am I missing something? He’s played on exactly one winning team since he’s been in Cincinnati with zero playoff wins. What’s he going to teach guys that come from Oklahoma, Florida, Texas, or USC?

He’s a nice guy. He works hard. He blocks pretty well. We’re not talking about an NFL god here. Good grief, fellas. Are you not overstating this even just a little bit?

by bodacio zk on May 31, 2010 1:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

you bring this up all the time

and jt was a leader on d and is a good guy, but he was nowhere near as talked about as reggie. reggie has always been seen as a pro and a leader. and like many people have said, if you think that doesn’t matter, look at the teams that do well every year.

do you think indy would be good without veteran leadership
baltimore without lewis or reed
pitt without a constant stream of veterans
NE the same.

these are teams that are good yearly and it’s because they have veterans that mentor rookies. both on how to be a pro and what is expected on the field.

RIP Slim.

by brandone on May 30, 2010 11:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

you dispute this all the time

So it’s not the ridiculous amount of talent those teams have or great coaches?

“Veterans that mentor rookies.”

I think there’s a bit more to it than that, guy. Hilarious.

And exactly what young TE has Reggie mentored to success? Let’s cut out all of this fluff and get into some objective analysis. Examples, please.

by bodacio zk on May 31, 2010 1:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

"but overall we ran the ball better(without his world class blocking)"

True. But you can probably thank the off-balanced line. Dennis Roland blocking > Any TE blockers.

Blogger at CincyJungle.com -- SB Nation Cincinnati Bengals blog.

by Josh Kirkendall on May 29, 2010 11:27 AM EDT up reply actions  

"the locker room stayed together(without his world class personality)"

It’s not like he went into oblivion. He was with the team for portions of the season when he could join them (we had posts about that too)

Blogger at CincyJungle.com -- SB Nation Cincinnati Bengals blog.

by Josh Kirkendall on May 29, 2010 11:28 AM EDT up reply actions  

Come on now. 2006-2008. Team is in disarray with Reggie Kelly playing and in the locker room. Where was he? Do we hang that on him as well? Of course not. At the end of the day these are grown men responsible for their own actions and how they play on the field. Solid joes are nice to have around, but that only does so much.

by bodacio zk on May 29, 2010 3:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

Thats true but...

You still have to have a solid veteran to show the young guys the rope. Basically like you said one guy can’t do it all. It does go a long way to help the team though. That is why he is a fan favorite and why the coaches love him. He is basically an extra coach on the field.

by C1ncy4Life on May 30, 2010 9:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

Bryant

How in the world they passed Dez Bryant over Gresham ????
Sure we’re going to regret it !!!!!
Chad is getting older, we need a sure bet youngster
I know we need a TE, but we could’ve gotten Gresham in the 2nd. maybe 3rd. Round
Probably we gave the Cowgirls a Super Bowl.

by Who Dey not Who Day !!!!! on May 28, 2010 5:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

come on now

Gresham in the 2nd or 3rd…LOL

You might want to check out that the New England Patriots Drafted a TE in the 2nd round 10+ picks ahead of our 2nd round pick

by Jaydolla on May 28, 2010 5:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

Agreed plus....

It was widely KNOWN that Baltimore also coveted Gresham. The fact they ended up drafting 2 TE’s is also proof they would have taken Gresham. On top of that you mention New England. They definitely would have taken Gresham as well. Add to those 2 teams who DEFINITELY would have taken Gresham, teams that would have drafted BPA and he doesn’t even make it out of the 1st and especially doesn’t drop to us in the 2nd! NO WAY!

by C1ncy4Life on May 29, 2010 10:30 AM EDT up reply actions  

NO way Gresham would have been there for even a handful more picks

Everyone knows that Baltimore and New England would have picked Gresham right behind us. I can see someone making an argument that we should have took Bryant but it is ridiculous to think that Gresham would have been there when we picked in the 2nd. He wouldn’t have made it to the 2nd round PERIOD, and especially would not have been there when we picked.

If you want to make the argument we should have taken Dez Bryant then you could say that we could’ve have gotten a good TE in the 2nd or 3rd but not Gresham. Maybe that would’ve have been the best way to go but, I like whay they did because we got the #1 TE in the draft AND we got the best SLOT receiver in the draft, IMO. On top of that we also got other players such as Dunlap because we weren’t forced to reach for a TE after the 1st because we had selected Bryant. If we had selected Dez Bryant in the first then I believe the FO and Coaches would have felt they had to get a TE in the 2nd round. That being said its likely that they may have had to reach to get one. Instead they were able to take the best players in most rounds because they had already took the #1 TE.

by C1ncy4Life on May 29, 2010 10:27 AM EDT up reply actions  

I hope you’re not an adult…

by bodacio zk on May 29, 2010 11:03 AM EDT up reply actions  

Not with a 1st round pick

I remember when we were projected to get Mercedes Lewis and Zach Miller. We can say they have tried to upgrade with Utecht, Coffman, etc. However, they have never put this much focus into the TE position during the ML era. Zach Miller, from the Raiders, may have been a 2nd rounder.

 Utecht was never that great. The guy had Peyton Manning throwing to him. We just drafted the best TE in the draft with our 1st round pick. Prior to the draft, I was pumped about us getting some 2nd and 3rd round prospects. The FO and ML went all the way this year on the new #84. A new era for the TE is here. At least i hope….

by DonMegga on May 29, 2010 5:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

It is

Also add to Gresham a very talented Coffman who continue’s to develop and we should be set at the TE position for atleast the next 5 years and probably longer if we keep both young TE’s. Gresham is a far better blocker than a lot of people have given him credit for. He blocked a lot more in college than Coffman did and will be way ahead of where Coffman was last year.

by C1ncy4Life on May 29, 2010 10:32 AM EDT up reply actions  

Craziest draft ever

I know, but what if they also passed on Gresham.
All of my friends from OKC are concern about his ability to block, especially health.

by Who Dey not Who Day !!!!! on May 28, 2010 5:35 PM EDT reply actions  

then the Ravens

they took a TE in the 3rd and the 4th… so they would’ve definitely grabbed Gresham with one of their 2 picks in the second.

I’m confused on the health thing though… he played in 41 consecutive games in college with only 1 injury in his 3 yrs to a non major ligament… and 1 injury in HS an ACL. How is that some huge health problem?

Owen Daniels is a beast and a Pro Bowler with 2 ACL tears in just the NFL (now on his third)… and I remember poeple wanting to grab him.

by Jaydolla on May 28, 2010 5:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

friends from OKC

might have concerns about his blocking, but according to the TE coach Hayes and ML they felt he would be a decent blocker. Also, I prefer Gresham’s personality over Dez.

by redberkey on May 28, 2010 9:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ok let me answer your 2 questions.

First off Gresham blocked WAY more in college than people are giving him credit for. Is he a dominant blocker at this point in his career? NO, but he is sufficient enough he will contribute. He will continue to work on it and will become a Great inline blocker. He has all of the physical tools, plus he has a great “no-nonsense” type of work ethic. His blocking will be ok his rookie year and he will develop into a very good blocker, within 2-3 years.

On the knee injury. It was not ligament damage on this last injury. It was cartilage which is FAR less scary. With the medicine today ligaments are constantly repaired and players get even stronger in a lot of cases. However it wasn’t even a ligament on his last knee injury. Injuries happen to everyone and it would be stupid of me to say that he will never be injured. However I feel that his knee is completely fine at this point. You never know what could happen. Example: Ki-Jana Carter!

In the end Gresham was a very good pick. He may not have been the flashiest pick but will contribute heavily and will solidify our TE position for the next 5-7 years atleast.

by C1ncy4Life on May 29, 2010 10:39 AM EDT up reply actions  

Just picture this..............

Think about all of the passes that bounced off of Coles, Coats’ and Caldwell’s hands and try to imagine if those same passes were thrown to Bryant, Gresham and Shipley. If these guys were here last year we would have won at least 2 more games. Maybe 3 it you consider that we lost by 10 to the Jets with only 1 WR and a TE who made the team worse by being in there.

"If we always agree, one of us is not necessary"

by JUNGLEJOHN on May 31, 2010 11:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

FA is key for 2010

The Bengals willingness to dabble in the free agent market & pick up receivers is going to be the game changing key for 2010. Gresham will contribute but will seem average against other league TEs. He needs to earn the hype on Sundays…Saturdays mean nothing now!

by Vman in Germany on May 29, 2010 5:54 PM EDT reply actions  

Good WRs are much more easy to find than TEs

Gresham is also more inline with what we needed. The real key is the combonation. Bryant and Chad will hold down the downfield game. Gresham will potentially dominate linebackers but the key is to mix in a quick and sure handed Slot reciver in Shipley who can get of the LOS and get open quickly in the short middle routes and not only catch it and hold onto it but has the ability to make people miss. If things work out as it is very likely they might we will have one of the to WR corps in terms of sure handedness. Gresham has big, soft hands and Shipley – well he just catches everything. We will not see many balls bouncing off of receivers hands this year. I have a very good feeling about both the Gresham and especially the Shipley pick.

"If we always agree, one of us is not necessary"

by JUNGLEJOHN on May 29, 2010 10:34 PM EDT reply actions  

Very good point.

We needed players to help control the middle. Thats why both Gresham and Shipley were GREAT picks. I know people wanted Bryant in the 1st or even Mardy instead of Shipley. The way the draft fell though we get the #1 TE. That is pretty unanimous amongst the “experts” and most fans. On top of that we also got the #1 ‘Slot’ receiver, atleast IMO.

We have players that can dominate outside in Chad, Bryant, etc… We needed players who can make the tough catch over the middle. Now that we have that in Gresham, Shipley, Antonio Bryant (can go over the middle as well) and even Coffman, that forces defenses to key in on the middle of the field. D’s can’t constantly role the safety over the top on Chad. That is HUGE.

No matter what people were saying about Revis in the Playoff game he had Safety help on most of those plays. The reason? Because the safeties didn’t fear our TE’s or receivers over the middle. They could put a LB on our receivers and TE’s over the middle and consistently win the battle. Not anymore my friends.

Gresham is too quick for Linbackers and in fact even too big for them. Safeties are quick enough but then all he has to do is use his size advantage because they aren’t a whole lot quicker than him anyway. Throw in Shipley who is far to fast for a Linbacker or even most Safeties. We will consistently win the battle over the middle and Chad will get more one on one coverage. That will lead to more Big Plays. Especially with other players such as Matt Jones.

JungleJohn- I think we both have been singing the praises of these two picks since they made them. People will be on board by the 3-4 game when Shipley is controlling the middle. Shipley quickly becomes a fan favorite.

by C1ncy4Life on May 30, 2010 9:40 AM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Cincinnati Bengals.

Editor-In Chief

Cj_small Josh Kirkendall

Editor/Managing Editor

Rudiblanket_small Anthony Cosenza

5255_133614603784_666578784_2414703_1976100_n_small Jason Garrison

Authors

Photo_3_small BeerRun

010511170110_small Joe Goodberry

40297_422933299865_509514865_4658259_6466915_n_small Ryan Harper

Small Brennen Warner

Sb_nation_small Jack Cassidy

580551_10150822857707018_613867017_11694254_1239726425_n_small Nick_Crago

Img_0783_small Mike Fightmaster

Moderators

Nfl palewook

680764146_0eac16fabd_small 80%OFTHETIMEIMRIGHTEVERYTIME

Tawky_tawny_small UpStateMike

Joeb698_86e260_small joeb69

Bengals_stamp_by_jamaal10_small Doc Scratch