Low-Water Mark: Bengals Depth Concerns
During the offseason, when games and seasons are played out on paper, the roster of teams seem as concrete as the stadiums they play in. Yet when a player blows out his Achilles, or arrested for assault, suddenly we realize that rosters are made up of mortal men and that anything can happen to them. When these nasty lightning bolts do strike, depth suddenly springs to the top of the list of concerns.
In the Bengals case, if most of you are like me, when you heard of Cedric Benson's recent troubles, you began calculating the number of games that he would likely therefore miss due to suspension. As information surrounding the case trickles in, it now seems less likely he'll miss much time if any, but that doesn't change the fact that I felt a creeping uneasiness at the thought of Bernard Scott as the featured workhorse for four games. This worry sparked my imagination to wonder of other positions that could create further anxiety to the already fragile Bengal-fan psyche.
Brian Leonard has more of the physical make-up to be a bruiser back, but he never showed much productivity on first and second-down hand-offs last season. As a third-down specialist he is remarkably effective, and the extra effort he regularly displays makes the heart of a fan swell, but he should be limited to his specialist role, otherwise he is average at best.
There is also Cedric Peerman somewhere on the roster. Having never seen Peerman run, I know very little about the guy, but I know he is fast (4.45 in the 40-yard dash), never fumbled in college, and was a dangerous kick-returner at Virginia. He also jumped 40 inches vertically at the combine. As impressive as it is, I'm not sure what that's good for in a running back other than slamming the ball through the uprights after a touchdown. Peerman's scouting report from college mentions his low center of gravity, and that, mixed with his straight-line speed, not to mention decent size (220 lbs.), makes him the best candidate to replace Benson should the need arise.
With all due respect to all three men mentioned, that makes me nervous.
Obviously, if anything serious happens to Carson Palmer between now and February, panic would become the proper mind-sate in regard to the team, and honestly, the Bengals have showed little interest to this cataclysmic possibility. Most would agree that while J.T. O'Sullivan always looks good in the preseason, no one really believes in him if it ever became serious. We all labored through a painful season of Ryan Fitzpatrick learning the vigors of the game, and placing O'Sullivan in the same predicament seems almost, dare I say, an even worse-case scenario. And while I want Jordan Palmer to be a capable NFL quarterback, the road there seems infinitely out of reach for him; it takes more than good genes to rise to the top.
The other position that would become of baby-pool depths should someone go down is at linebacker. Rookie and projected backup Roddrick Muckleroy has already broken his hand, Rey Maualuga is coming back from a broken ankle and an apparent drinking problem, Dhani Jones continues to tour the world undergoing dangerous physical tasks that can only wear down his aging body, and Keith Rivers has yet to prove that he can play an entire NFL schedule. Brandon Johnson is an excellent backup who often times looks like a starter, but beyond him, the bench looks bleak. Abdul Hodge is best left to special teams, and Rashad Jeanty is an overachiever whose chances of making a final roster spot seem to be circling the drain.
Moving defensive end, Michael Johnson, to an outside linebacker spot, shows that team management is concerned about linebacker depth as well. This move is an intriguing one as The Giraffe has the athleticism and speed to play the position and there is plenty of depth along the defensive line to spare, but the question remains, does he have the instincts to play in space? Until now, we only knew him as a pass-rusher whose best trait was to bat passes into the air. He can still speed rush from the outside linebacker spot, and it allows Zimmer to show off some 3-4 schemes from time to time, but if injuries mount at linebacker, will Johnson be asked to do more than rush the passer?
Every team has worrisome spots on its roster, and some will be snake-bitten in those very areas, but when that happens, it falls on the coaches to prepare the next man standing to do the job well enough. I've written about the quality of the Bengals coaching staff, and my esteem in them remains as high as ever, but at the quarterback, the running back, and the linebacker positions, good coaching may not be sufficient. The Bengals would be wise to keep an eye on the waiver wire to add more bodies to these thin ranks.
So here is to a shot of good luck and a dose of smart-decision making; keep your bones intact and your noses clean, boys, we need as much help as we can get this year.
Mojokong—one who needs no backup...yet.
23 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Hmmmm...
Good article, but I’d disagree on the depth. I think this team is one of the deepest they’ve ever had. Really the only weak spots in terms of depth behind the starter are: QB, FB, G. I think they’ve beefed up D-Line, LB, CB, S, WR, TE. True, if Ced were to miss time, it would really hurt, but how much? Two different guys ran for 100+ yards last year when Ced was out. That’s a credit to the O-Line. As for talking about Jeanty, I’d take the reverse opinion on Mojokong about him—being that he’s a former starter and may not make the team actually speaks to the depth at the position, not the other way around. Still—injuries can’t take their toll the way they did through 2006-2008 and at the end of last season. We need the studs to stay healthy.
I really have to disagree with you on B. Scott
In his one game he started and was the featured back last season, he had over 100 Yards!! I really have faith in B. Scoot as a running back, especially after having a full season under his belt and 5 pre season games to get ready for this year. He will be good, Marvin has already said he will see alot more of the workload this season.
In Zim We Trust......Collaros for Heisman
I agree
I like B. Scott and I see no reason why he can’t be a featured back. I still haven’t figured out where all this concern comes from.
Depth issue
In my opinion the depth issue isn’t scott. It’s who fills his role when he’s running full time. I think that is why Cincy has 3-4 guys that can return kicks not named Caldwell now. There is not a good RB behind Scott like LJ last year. Hopefully Peerman can be that guy but if Benson gets suspended then I would like a late camp cut pick up like Julius Jones, or one of the dozen or so veterans that Washington has right now, Portis, Betts, LJ.
RE: Scott
Yea, BUT.
In the next game after his 100-yard effort against the Raiders, he carried the football 18 times against the Cleveland Browns and injured his toe — he missed several games.
Blogger at CincyJungle.com -- SB Nation Cincinnati Bengals blog.
by Josh Kirkendall on Jul 2, 2010 10:02 AM EDT up reply actions
agree
I don’t think Scott can ever be a “bell cow.” He’s just too small. I do want to see him getting more touches either on the ground or in the air, but if he has to carry the ball 25+ times a game, I would worry about his durability.
If Benson misses a few games, hopefully between Peerman, Scott, and Leonard we have enough flexibility to get us through.
my concern with Scott...
…is that he loses yards on too many carries. He ran for over a 100 yards that day mostly on a 61-yard scamper, which is why I like him; he is explosive, but for an every-down back, you must get some yards on every run, and not lose them.
B. Clifton Burke
Agreed- he's not a between the tackles runner
that’s where bratbrain ran him most of the time that game. Calling the same running plays that Benson would run.
Depth, etc.
I’m worried about our LB corps, but not as much as I am about where we are at FB or FS.
At LB, I feel like we’re good five deep—Rivers, Rey, Dhani, Brandon Johnson, Jeanty. Yeah, Dhani’s on the downslope, and Jeanty is probably best as a backup, but all five of those guys have done well at one point or another. And then you factor in Muckelroy and Michael Johnson, who should provide further depth. That said, we should be a lot better than we are at LB, given that we’ve spent a first and second in recent years. Rivers and Rey really need to step things up.
At FB, we have no idea what we have. Fui has never actually played in a regular-season game, has he? Which leaves us with either UDFA Tronzo or bringing back Jeremi yet again. We’re allegedly a power-running team, we need a FB that can block…if Tronzo can do it better than Fui, bring him in. If not, go with Fui. If neither can, I’d rather take a flier on a FA than rely on Jeremi.
At FS, well, the issue is age, obviously. I hope that one of the UDFAs can step up.
As for RB depth…I tend to think that you strengthen the line first, and then find a RB to plug in. If Andre Smith can step up, and/or if the line can develop chemistry, I’m not super-worried. But it’d be a good idea to find another bellcow.
Great Read.....The Bengals did a good job of adding depth everywhere except RB
Ced proved that he could be a workhorse last year. They ran him a little too much if you ask me. The redskins have signed alot of RB over the winter and will probably have too cut one loose. They have Portis, Larry Johnson and also Willie Parker plus one other guy whose I can’t think of but I know that he filled in for Portis when he got hurt. My point is that Willie Parker looks like the odd man out. Parker’s days as a #1RB are over and he could help the Bengals if Ced has to miss any games. I think that Scott could fill that role over a 2-4 game scenario…but at what cost. He is not that big and was injury prone last year. I would have loved for Larry johnson to come back to the Bengals.
Kenneth Lewis Moore
I am only concerned with one position at this time
Back up QB. In no way do I trust either of our back ups to step in and play . It would be really STUPID to not locate Carson’s backup ASAP. There are a good number of solid QBs to be had. We might be looking to see who gets dropped to let rookies and 2nd year guys win the role in camps. I really hope so!
RB concerns are luke warm. Lets say Ced gets a 4 game suspension for whatever reason. We would be looking at a another good pool of quality backs to choose from.
LB concerns are non exisitant unless they start dropping like flies, but that can be said for any position.
2010 - The Year of the Tiger.
I"m concerned about the backup QB thing too, but honestly, what backup out there can take us to a SB win if Carson goes down? It might be a moot point.
This is our year!
I agree,
The Draft was a place to find a backup qb. There really isn’t anyone available, unless vick gets cut… I wish i hadn’t said that
QB and Center
I agree with UpStateMike about the QB position. And the 3rd QB should be someone who is being developed.
But what about our center? Is Luigs ready?
Fullback
With the way the Bengals use their fullback, why don’t they look for an athletic, undersized (for the pro’s) college guard — maybe 6’0, 280 lbs., — and teach him to play the position. Johnson had 4 rushing attempts last year, and caught 6 passes — hardly an offensive threat. Just thinking…..
Low blow
All I’m saying is that the Bengals use the fullback to block, and that’s pretty much it. And if that’s all he’s going to do, then why have a 240-lb guy when a 280-lb guy could block better.
I think this team is very deep at linebacker
We have guys who are proven capable (and potentially exceptional) all the way down the line. Rey and Muckleroy will recover fine… Rivers is a good player who hasn’t reached his full potential, M. Johnson will be used in spots, Jones hasn’t slowed down at all and even if he does we’re already grooming Two guys behind him, and our backups could start on many teams. Our linebacker depth is a strength… not a weakness.
I hope you're right
but Rivers hasn’t finished a full season, and the area of field that Dhani can reasonably cover is shrinking between those hashmarks. We don’t know what we’re getting with Muckleroy yet, and Jeanty is unimpressive. Michael Johnson is an experiment and Abdul Hodge shouldnt see much time on defense. I like Brandon Johnson though.
B. Clifton Burke
A thought about the RB concern
Looking at the draft and free agency, the Bengals appear to have made several moves that could drastically improve the passing game this season. With the additions of Bryant, Shippley and Gresham, I could see a potential short term shift in offensive philosophy in the absence of Benson. Seeing as how Brian Leonard is quite adept at catching passes in the back field and picking up additional yards, it seems possible that the Bengals could simply try to stretch defenses too thin by sheer quantity of receiving options. Perhaps this mixed with occasional B. Scott action would be sufficient to move the ball until that time in which Benson would return.
On LB concerns, I have little aside from possibly losing Dhani at middle. Jeanty is a solid player who also makes his mark on specials teams. I honestly don’t see him getting cut. Personally, I see Micheal Johnson as an Adalius Thomas type of project. I think the coaches see his raw athleticism and size are looking for different ways to make mismatches for other teams. The move to flex LB is more based on strategy than to bolster depth.

by 


















