Another Reason Terrell Owens Makes Sense: Bengals Lack Experience With Current Crop of Receivers
There are several reasons why the Cincinnati Bengals would be interested in Terrell Owens. Ranging from having a backup plan to Antonio Bryant's knee to just having a trio of badass receivers to dominate the AFC North. Either way, when you look at the current crop of Bengals receivers, one thing stands out; even though there's plenty of upside and potential as a group, these guys are largely unproven and inexperienced. If you combine all ten of the team's receivers on the roster, they've recorded 2,134 yards receiving and 16 touchdowns as a unit. This isn't necessarily a damaging thing, considering that two receivers are rookies, one receiver was out in 2009 and two others spent time on the team's practice squad.
Here's the breakdown for our receivers in 2009.
Production in 2009 By Bengals Receivers On The Roster in 2010 |
||||
| GAMES | REC | YARDS | TDS | |
| Chad Ochocinco | 16 | 72 | 1,047 | 9 |
| Antonio Bryant | 13 | 39 | 600 | 4 |
| Andre Caldwell | 16 | 51 | 432 | 3 |
| Quan Cosby | 16 | 4 | 55 | 0 |
| Matt Jones | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jerome Simpson | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Maurice Purify | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Freddie Brown | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dezmon Briscoe | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jordan Shipley (unsigned) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Span that out over the course of their respective careers, and the Bengals have three receivers with over 100 receptions, 1,000 yards receiving and ten touchdowns.
Career Production in By Bengals Receivers On The Roster in 2010 |
||||
| GAMES | REC | YARDS | TDS | |
| Chad Ochocinco | 137 | 684 | 9,952 | 62 |
| Antonio Bryant | 82 | 372 | 5,682 | 30 |
| Matt Jones | 54 | 166 | 2,153 | 15 |
| Andre Caldwell | 23 | 62 | 510 | 3 |
| Quan Cosby | 16 | 4 | 55 | 0 |
| Jerome Simpson | 8 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
| Maurice Purify | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Freddie Brown | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dezmon Briscoe | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jordan Shipley (unsigned) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
It's an incomplete graphic, for sure. The Bengals are likely going to be incorporating two rookies into the team's offense with Shipley and Jermaine Gresham (not that he's a receiver or anything); provided Dezmon Briscoe doesn't disappoint during training camp and the preseason, he could in a position to make the squad as well. Simpson, a disappointing figure from the 2008 NFL Draft, has made enough noise during offseason practices to be a factor. While the upside for all receivers is huge, the inexperience is also glaring and big -- with that in mind, wouldn't Matt Jones have an advantage based on his experience alone?
So with the uncertainly surrounding Bryant's knee and Caldwell hardly being considered a number two receiver, it makes too much sense for the Bengals to go out and sign Terrell Owens, if for anything, an insurance policy.
0 recs |
7 comments
|
Comments
DId you guys see this?
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/writers/don_banks/07/27/precamp.1/index.html?eref=sihp
CNNSI thinks the Bengals are in the top half of the NFL. They think the Jets are 1 and Ravens 3. They do have us ahead of the Browns.
RE:
The schedule has most national pundits very hesitant with us. I guess I can understand that; the schedule will be rough.
Blogger at CincyJungle.com -- SB Nation Cincinnati Bengals blog.
by Josh Kirkendall on Jul 27, 2010 1:45 PM EDT up reply actions
I just don't buy it
Baltimore is third. The differences in BAL schedule is that we play at IND where they play at Houston. We have SD at home while they play Denver at home. I will grant that both of these games are to Baltimore’s advanatge. The only other difference is that we play Baltimore, who we beat twice last year, while they play Cincinnati who they lost to twice last year. They will probably be without their best player (Ed Reed) for 6 weeks. Reed will be out at NYJ, At Cin, at Pit, home for Denver and at NE. They play 4 of their first 6 on the road without their best player. They could easily be 2-4, unless you dismiss Cincinati because we weren’t good in the 90’s, and we sputtered in 2006 following our last play-off appearance. I just don’t respect most sports analysts analysis.
+1
This could potentially be a serious matter. If reports surrounding Bryant’s knee are indeed true, without the addition of TO, we could be in trouble. We could possibly not even have Ced for the first however many games. Potentially.. no TO, Bryant, or Ced could make for a very bad start; especially if Gresham and Shipley are not ready.. and as of this post, they remain unsigned. With our strength of schedule, it is imperative to have a good start. We are counting on Gresham and Shipley to make a significant contribution, and really need both of them there by the first minute of training camp. We could find ourselves relying on Caldwell and Simpson more than anyone would truly be comfortable with. Even though, I believe, Simpson may have turned the corner, we are still talking significant uncertainty. Caldwell is NOT a #2 receiver. Or.. we could be left with Matt Jones as #2. Am I being alarmist?
Per Aaron Wilson
Shipley has signed… nothing reported officially by the Bengals yet however.
by Oregonbengalsfan on Jul 27, 2010 2:21 PM EDT up reply actions
Thanks.. just saw it on Joe Reedy Twitter
@joereedy
Two draft picks appear to be in the fold — Muckelroy and Shipley. Now waiting on the top two … and TO #bengals

by 





























