Brian Leonard ≥ John Riggins?
I didn't know who John Riggins was until about 25 minutes ago so if you're nervous about getting struck down by a bolt of lightning from the football gods then don't share a bench with me. I'm asking for it. If you don't know who John Riggins is, here you go: John Riggins was a fullbackish running back for the New York Jets and the Washington Redskins (he made more of a name for himself as a Redskin). He was the Super Bowl XVII MVP, considered to be on the 1980's All-Decade Team, in the Redskins Hall of Fame, won the Bert Bell award in 1983 and was inducted into the NFL Hall of Fame in 1992. So, John Riggins was really good.
I guess if you were going to compare one white running back to another white running back, you could always do worse than a hall of famer who racked up 3,000 yards in his first two seasons as a professional football player. Leonard is pretty happy with the comparison.
"I'm my own person but do share some of the same similarities as Riggins," Leonard said, per Holmes. (So Leonard has sprouted a Riggins-style 'fro?) "He was a hard runner and had good hands out of the backfield. That's what I feel like I do, make one cut and get up field, break a few arm tackles and make a couple of guys miss. That's me. Hopefully, this is a breakout year for me."
The biggest difference between Leonard and Riggins, besides the fro, the decade and the whole Hall of Fame thing, is the fact that one ran the ball and one catches the ball. As a third down back, Leonard does a lot of catching the ball out of the backfield. Last season, Leonard had some key plays to help the Bengals extend some of those last minute scoring drives. Without him, the Bengals would not have been 10-6 and may not have made the playoffs.
Riggins, on the other hand, rarely caught the ball out of the backfield. His run to catch ratio was 11-1.
So this comparison is great in theory. It's always nice to be compared to somebody great. I love it when people compare me to Brad Pitt, Ryan Reynolds or that guy who played Sloth in The Goonies. I'm sure it's flattering to be compared to a Hall of Famer but without the numbers, a comparison really doesn't count for anything.
That may change soon. IF Cedric Benson does get suspended (and I doubt he will.... knock on wood), Leonard could see an expanded role in the offense. Bernard Scott may get the bulk of the carries but Leonard wouldn't just be used as a third down back. IF that is the case, we'll be able to watch Leonard show his stuff.
The Dayton Daily News reports that Cedric Benson could be suspended by the NFL for his latest arrest in Texas last week. That means that Brian Leonard and Bernard Scott would be the primary backs featured in Cincinnati’s offense. They’re expected to take on bigger roles even if Benson isn’t suspended. "I feel like I can do anything," said Leonard. "The coaches believe I can do it and feel comfortable with me at any position. My reps have increased, and I’m expected to be more involved in the offense. I’m a team player and will do whatever is asked of me."
I watched Leonard perform the "Leonard Leap" while he was at Rutgers and I'd be willing to bet that his vertical leap hasn't gone anywhere since then. If anything, it's gotten better. Maybe he'll show us this season.
Hopefully Benson doesn't get suspended, if he does though, I trust Scott and Leonard to fill his shoes until he gets back.
21 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I had
to laugh when I started reading your post Jason, yeah, you deserve to be smacked hard for not knowing Riggins. And I just have to say that I am a fan of how Leonard plays the game but he couldn’t hold Mr. Riggins’ jock strap on his best day. Benson might miss one game, smart money has him not being suspended at all.
He won
The super bowl MVP in 1983. That’s the year I was born. That’s my defense. So maybe you should smack me hard for not knowing who Riggins is…. I think that the most I deserve is a stern talking to
by Jason Garrison on Jul 7, 2010 6:36 PM EDT up reply actions
Ok
You are forgiven, I’ve got you by about 20 years! Watch some of the videos on youtube, the guy was a beast.
Dude, still...
You should know this guy. I was born in ‘82 and I’m pretty familiar with him. He was not only a beast, but he is a VERY outspoken sports talk radio host now who often gets national attention for his off-the-wall comments. It’s ok, we forgive you though, haha.
by Anthony Cosenza on Jul 7, 2010 7:22 PM EDT up reply actions
Not Fogiven
You’re obviously a fan of the NFL if you’re a regular contributor to an NFL blog. My point isn’t to give you a hard time…well, yeah it is.
I was born in ‘78 and I can tell you who Earl Campbell was or what number Franco Harris wore. I can also tell you who Jim Taylor was or for god’s sake, Jim Brown, and they all played well before I was born.
I mean, Riggins isn’t exactly the 1983 equivalent to Eric Ball. (Do you at least know who he was?)
Young kids in your generation have NO respect for history.
by JohnCockToastin on Jul 7, 2010 8:00 PM EDT up reply actions
Apparently not
1978 has credibility…apparently the ’93 model left that feature out.
by JohnCockToastin on Jul 8, 2010 7:02 AM EDT up reply actions
1983
Now I have no credibility! …We’re even!
by JohnCockToastin on Jul 8, 2010 7:03 AM EDT up reply actions
I was born in 1949. I saw Horrning, JIm Brown, Jim Taylor and Riggens
plat live. My dad and older brother were huge NFL fans – I mean huge. I have Max McGee’s autograph. I wonder how many of you guys know who he was without googling it. I have seen a lot. The only downside is that there are a lot more football games behind me than are ahead of me. I also have Paul Brown’s and Jim Brown’s autograph on the same football. It, along with my 1959 Gibson Les Paul Sunburst, are my most prized possessions.
"If we always agree, one of us is not necessary"
Know em All - No Need to Google
Max McGee should have been SB-I MVP. Stayed out all night drinking the night before because he didn’t think he was going to be play much. I want to say it was Boyd Dowler who was in front of him who couldn’t start the game? (Swear to God I’m not Googling) Anyways, McGee hadlike 140 yds and 2 TD’s but Starr got the MVP. One of McGee’s TD’s was that sweet behind the back one hand grab.
I was born in ‘78. How’s the for knowledge of NFL history?
And oh yeah by the way, Jim Brown was a better lacrosse player than he was a football player. Also was a pretty nice hoops player at Syracuse. Most people don’t know that either.
by JohnCockToastin on Jul 9, 2010 9:48 AM EDT up reply actions
Actually you are one of the few posters here I would have expected to know that
That Packers team was great top to bottom. Yes Brown is still considered by many to be the best college lacrosse player ever to play.the game. It is good to see a young man who studies the game. Did you ever wonder how good McGee might have been if the actually tried to stay in shape? The man had the body of a shoe salesman. Al Bundy in cleats.
"If we always agree, one of us is not necessary"
Thats pretty funny
He was an Al Bundy in cleats!
I appreciate the compliment too. I’m just an NFL junky. I grew up watching NFL Films over and over and over. I love that stuff. Still love it. I pretty much only watch the news, sports and NFL Network. And not necessarily in that order. (Watchin NFLN right now actually)
Not trying to be super critical of Jason, but how do you NOT know who Riggins is if you’re an NFL fan whatsoever? …let alone an NFL blogger for crying out loud. The guy’s a Hall of Famer and a SB MVP…AND…a present day NFL analyst.
That’s a microcosm of today’s younger generation if you ask me. No respect for their elders or for the history they created. (And yes, Jason, you are a different generation than me)
by JohnCockToastin on Jul 11, 2010 10:57 AM EDT up reply actions
I give Jason a break too. He is young. That is not his fault.
I applaud the fact that he is engaged. I am 30+ years older than he is and I didn’t spend that time sleeping. I was following pro foot ball when it was telecast on black and white and wasn’t the media sensation it is now. Jason does not have that advantage. I give him credit for putting an opinion out there. Kudos to you Jason. Keep digging. Just remember just because some of us are old in age does not mean we are old at heart. I like young people. I have two bachelors degrees, and a masters degree and my career will be ove in less than a year. I still take two or three college courses a year. It keeps me in touch and allows me to engage with younger people as well as continue to learn. It helps keep me young, in spirit at least.
. The problem with this whole area of discussion is that I really don’t think the comparison is very apt. Riggins was a bruiser and a banger. Leonard is a tough runner but he IMO is a bit more of a crafty runner. I just wish he could put on another 20 pounds and be our FB. He knows how to find the weakest area of what is ahead of him and gets sideways if he needs to and find the extra yard or so in a crease. What they do have in common is that they keep digging and keep their feet churning for the extra inch. IMO Leonard may be the best “football player” on the team. I think Shipley is of the same mold.
"If we always agree, one of us is not necessary"
"Leonard Leap"
This is actually the first I had seen the “Leonard Leap”. When I saw it I thought of the Chase Coffman highlights that I watched during this year’s draft (since I didn’t watch them last year). He looks like a track hurdle runner! This video is why I am excited and hope that, being healthy and having time to learn the offense, that Chase will be a big contributor alongside Jermaine Gresham this year and for years to come. Kelly, Gresham, and Coffman… I don’t see a need for Coats… especially since our current long snapper, Clark Harris, doubles as a backup tight end.
by Oregonbengalsfan on Jul 7, 2010 6:28 PM EDT reply actions
Leonard is good, but I think he's more of a specialist
One of Brat’s quirks is the “blocking/receiving RB”—it used to be Watson, and now it’s Leonard. He uses this RB to block or go out for passes, often on third downs. I think Leonard has excelled in that role, and there’s nothing to say he couldn’t get even better. But I don’t think he’s a true every-down RB. Neither is Scott, IMHO, and that kind of worries me.
Do not let your heart be troubled.
As a tandem, Scott and Leonard, can be pretty good if the Oline gels like I think they will. They would have trouble sustaining it for double digit games, but for 2 or 3 they would do well. The Oline is the key and I think that is Andre plays as advertised they will be a top 10 OL easy, especially in the run game.
"If we always agree, one of us is not necessary"
I heart "The White Lightning".
That is all.
Oh, wait. Feel free to use my nickname for him. It gets pretty fun to yell it everytime he catches a pass and then yell out a thunder/lightning striking sound. The key to it being amazing is the yelling of the nickname.Then again, when I do this, I’m about 10 Miller Lites, a shot of Tequila and 2 shots of Whiskey deep so THAT could be the key to it being amazing.
Riggins
Gotta go with Tommyboy45 on this one. I like Leonard and all, but to put him in the same sentence with Riggins, is, well; DOWN RIGHT RIDICULOUS.
by James Schmid the great on Jul 8, 2010 1:10 AM EDT reply actions
Leonard and Scott will be more active this year
They were very limited last year but we’re going to see more of them.
Benson’s numbers will be lower, but the running game might even increase, or at least weapons from the backfield being used more. Leonard can actually make the ‘shudder’ shovel pass work because of his hands and speed.
Scott will be used more as the tandem guy. Benson has a target on his back now, so let the defenses think it’s going to him up the middle, and have Scott turn and burn along the edge. If he gets some decent blocks then it should add up to large gains.
2010 - The Year of the Tiger.

by 
























