Filtering the Cincinnati Bengals Roster: Dan Skuta As The Sixth And Final Linebacker?
Reviewing the game from Saturday against the Bills, I didn't note anything spectacular from our linebackers. At the same time, they're close to being at regular season form. Rey Maualuga made several nice plays, blitzing off the edges during run plays with solid pass coverage when he slide over as the middle linebacker. Still, his over-aggressiveness tends to show, overshooting tackles and lanes. Keith Rivers, as aggressive as I've ever seen him, I swear to god is literally looking to murder ball carriers -- even though he was only credited with an assist against Buffalo, he was seemed to be near the football more times than not, even disrupting the point of attack. Rivers has seven tackles through four preseason games. Dhani Jones was seen struggling in pass coverage -- how dare he not keep up with speedy wide receivers. Jones only has five preseason tackles.
Brandon Johnson and Roddrick Muckelroy each finished with five tackles against Buffalo, leading the team with Kyries Hebert. Rashad Jeanty is most likely going to miss the first six weeks of the regular season, being left on the Physically Unable to Perform list. He'll factor into the roster once the time comes.
So projecting the team's linebacker roster will be one of numbers. The team has taken as few as six linebackers and as many as eight during the Marvin Lewis era. The locks: Jones, Maualuga, Rivers, Brandon Johnson, Michael Johnson.
The sixth backer? Dan Skuta? Not only is he a quality player on special teams, he could play the role of two-way player, filling some time in as a fullback, considering Fui Vakapuna still hasn't played in the preseason. Geoff Hobson writes:
Even though he hasn’t played in the last two games, it looks like linebacker/fullback Dan Skuta (ankle) is going to make it. Look for him to play in Indy. That would give them six backers with Skuta and Brandon and Michael Johnson backing up. Is that all they’re going to keep now that they have to keep an extra running back with the Brian Leonard injury? That still leaves guys like veteran special-teamer Abdul Hodge and a fourth-round pick, Muckelroy, outside looking in.
Hodge's 2009 season was the most productive in his career, recording 11 special teams tackles (which ranked fourth on the team) and eight tackles on defense. Skuta only played in eight games, recording 10 special teams tackles ranking fifth on the team. And you can not discount his versatility as a fullback.
The question remaining is rookie Roddrick Muckelroy, the Bengals fourth round pick from Texas. After playing outside linebacker in 2008, Muckelroy slide over as a middle linebacker in 2009 -- a span in which he led the Longhorns in tackles in both seasons, leading the defense of a team that finished with a combined 25-2 record.
If the Bengals take six, whose your sixth linebacker?
11 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
i say they keep 7 and keep muckelroy and skuta
And only go with 4 DEs because mike johnson. And skuta can play DE
www.fantasydaddy.com
+1
I think we go with 7 linebackers as well. Skuta seems the most likely guy to make it because of his versatility. If Jeanty goes on the PUP though, it will be interesting to see what we do with Skuta when he gets back
I envision keeping 5 plus Michael Johnson
Skuta and Rey could both be parked on the PS. If Jeanty goes to the PUP list we have an injury replacement waiting in the wings for Week 7.
The comment about keeping an extra RB worries me. Why lose a good, young player at another roster spot just to have a mediocre RB insurance policy around? If we need to bring James Johnson back after waiving him, so what? It’s not like he’s going to be signed elsewhere…
dunno if they could park skuta on practice squad
played in 8 games in 2009
"wherever Brad St. Louis is and Shayne Graham is about to be." -R.F. Mehl
Muckelroy
They’re not getting rid of him. He can play all spots at LB and was a fourth-round pick this year. I’m not sure why this site seems to either not like him or forget about him, but he’s making the team this year. No way that Skuta beats him out. I could easily see them keeping 7 LBs, because MJ is a hybrid LB/DE. In that case the 7th spot would go to either Skuta or Vincent Rey.
On a related note, can you remember so many roster battles on a Bengals team? I can’t. Pretty refreshing to know how deep of a roster they have.
by Anthony Cosenza on Aug 30, 2010 12:33 PM EDT reply actions
And concerning too
Some of these guys are going to be hungry when they get let go and may land on a rival’s roster. I hate to think of them having intimate knowledge of some of the defensive schemes and going to another team. Not saying they see everything Zimmer has in mind, but it makes one wonder.
Skuta needs to stay
Otherwise he gets cut and an LB/FB hybrid is something that we should focus on keeping.
Muckman is part of the future. Having played all three spots, he needs to stay. Jones is at the end of his career and Brandon Johnson might finally decide to go and try to start somewhere else (something he could do). Eventually we’ll be down an LB and having a guy with the versatility to play multiple spots like Muckelroy will be optimal.
I get the feeling Rey not Maualuga won’t make it through waivers.
why
Why don’t they just put Skuta as the fullback and keep 6 backers? Skuta is primarily a special teams player and Geathers can play LB if needed.
So the 6 backers I propose would be rivers, maulaluga, jones, b johnson, m johnson and muckelroy. Skuta in the FB spot, as the FB spot is a dieing position.
A question I have, is why couldn’t we use Kelly as a TE/FB combo, as this is basically a blocking position and Kelly can obviously block and catch if needed. I think having an exclusive FB is a waste of a roster spot and should be used on a good blocker like Kelly or a stud special teams player like Skuta.

by 

















