Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: On Hazards And Hulks And Tigers, Oh My!

Bestest New Friend of Cincy Jungle: Pete Prisco Believes The Bengals Are Playoff Bound Again

One of the bones that Bengals fans love to pick revolves around predictions from many (though not all) NFL insiders that the Bengals will finish third in the division. Third. No playoffs for you. For the love of god, the team that swept the division and wasn't expected to be much better than the Cleveland Browns heading into the 2009 season, giggled when Pittsburgh, Baltimore and Cleveland had to wipe their gluteus maximuses with four-ply toilet paper (I'm nice guy) after losing to a team that went on an eight-game losing streak to start 2008 and finished with a third digit on their final record (I'm all about epic run-on sentences).

The Cincinnati Bengals went undefeated. Yet, some call it a fluke. Others find a way to quickly demote the Bengals in 2010 projections. I mean, it's the Bengals. Which NFL Insider is going to label the Bengals as repeat winners when they haven't been repeat division champions since I was four years old? And we're literally including the strike-shortened 1982 season.

Now, granted, most of the Bengals will finish at .500 talk was based on a rough schedule and well before the team signed Terrell Owens. And while said projections haven't really been updated with the modern flare of awesome revisions with sparkling fireworks, many NFL insiders are rethinking the Bengals.

Star-divide

Now, that being said, Pete Prisco is our pal. He believes, without a doubt, that the Bengals will revisit the playoffs this year.

That 2009 Bengals team won the AFC North, swept the division opponents, and made the playoffs for the first time since 2005. Yet in most preseason publications, the Bengals are not getting any consideration to repeat.

"I think it's because we're the Bengals," Palmer said. "It's been negative around here for so long. There is a kind of negative feeling when you talk about the Bengals. They expect us to be that team again. Don't judge this team by our history as an organization. Judge this one on the team that went out and won a division, and then go better. We're better than we were last season."

Correction: They are significantly better.

Duplicating their run through the AFC North won't be easy, but this Bengals team is clearly better than the one that ended the 2009 season with a disappointing playoff loss to the New York Jets. Most preseason picks have the Baltimore Ravens as the favorite to win the division, with Pittsburgh second.

Third for the Bengals? Does anybody pay attention to this team?

Comment 9 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I'm curious

to see what our record ends up being this year. It’s definitely a tougher schedule, and I think we got somewhat lucky last year, sneaking up on some people, especially in the division.

With the addition of TO, and what will hopefully be a better year from Palmer, I think we end up going 10-6 or 9-7, second in the division to the Ravens. Granted, that last part’s just a guess. The Ravens secondary could fall apart and we might have another chance at winning the North (though I doubt we go 6-0 again).

by wildcatfaninexile on Aug 4, 2010 4:21 PM EDT reply actions  

RE: Ravens

Well, they’ve already started with Foxworth already down for the year and Reed not being healthy for the moment.

Blogger at CincyJungle.com -- SB Nation Cincinnati Bengals blog.

by Josh Kirkendall on Aug 4, 2010 4:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

Gresham and Kelly

In addition to the upgraded recievers, there has been a major upgrade to the TE position from last year. Our top 2 TEs were lost for the season in camp. Coffman was never expected to contribute, and Coats was never meant to be more than a special teams guys who conuld contribute by blocking on the Goal line. Now Kelly is back, and Gresham could be the best TE in the division very soon.

Look closely at this offense, and you will see that it could be better than 2005’s. I don’t want to predict that it will be, but I think it is better than any other year this decade, though time will tell.

by jim0ijk on Aug 4, 2010 5:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

Forgot to consider the TEs

Excellent point. So, basically we’ve upgraded all over the place. Now we need CP9 to utilize those upgrades like he has in the past.

Man, if we even matched the 2005 offense with our ever improving D… could be a better year than I imagined…

by wildcatfaninexile on Aug 4, 2010 5:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

9-7?

Come on. We can—and will—do better than 9-7.

Redemption. The year belongs to us.

by cincylove on Aug 4, 2010 6:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

Estimating conservatively

I see us losing one of the first two (NE/BAL), beating CAR, CLE, TB, ATL, MIA, losing to PITT and IND, spanking BUF, losing against NYJ and NO, beating PITT, and losing one of the last 3 against CLE, SD and BAL (BAL is my guess, if they get their secondary back in working order).

Again, that’s a conservative estimate. I think we have a chance to go 12-4 if everything works out great. I definitely hope that happens, but setting the bar low makes it easier to surpass….haha!

by wildcatfaninexile on Aug 5, 2010 3:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hey, I like your team's chances to repeat too...but not because of TO.

It is amazing to me how much credit TO is getting for improving the Bengals passing game. I think you will get more of an impact from Shipley, Gresham, and Bryant, not to mention improved play from Palmer. And your defence looks to be better than last year. It seems that the Ravens are the sexy pick, but I like your chances to go deep into the playoffs.

Good luck from a Lions fan.

by NorthLeft12 on Aug 4, 2010 5:01 PM EDT reply actions  

don’t know how much impact bryant will have if the gimpy knee rumors are true. good luck for the lions.

i'm going to go america all over your ass!

by Raging Clue on Aug 4, 2010 9:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

How could the Bengals lose to the Ravens?

That depleted secondary looks worse than the Lions’ right now. Improved offense, sure, but can Flacco hold up in constant shootouts? I guess we’ll see.

by Doc Scratch on Aug 4, 2010 5:10 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Cincinnati Bengals.

Editor-In Chief

Cj_small Josh Kirkendall

Editor/Managing Editor

Rudiblanket_small Anthony Cosenza

5255_133614603784_666578784_2414703_1976100_n_small Jason Garrison

Authors

Photo_3_small BeerRun

010511170110_small Joe Goodberry

40297_422933299865_509514865_4658259_6466915_n_small Ryan Harper

Small Brennen Warner

Sb_nation_small Jack Cassidy

580551_10150822857707018_613867017_11694254_1239726425_n_small Nick_Crago

Img_0783_small Mike Fightmaster

Moderators

Nfl palewook

680764146_0eac16fabd_small 80%OFTHETIMEIMRIGHTEVERYTIME

Tawky_tawny_small UpStateMike

Joeb698_86e260_small joeb69

Bengals_stamp_by_jamaal10_small Doc Scratch